Re: New beta

2014-09-19 Thread Murphy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In response to vedaal's question - installation of gnupg v2.1 is significantly different from v1.x and even v2.0. For my Ubuntu machine hHere is a brief summary of the steps, in order 1. Install latest libraries: npth, libgpg-error, libgcrypt, libksb

Re: New beta

2014-09-19 Thread Robert J. Hansen
> and best on Debian Wheezy or Jessie. I plan to eventually add some > checks into the Makefile to suggest what to install. It would be nice if it could also be checked with Fedora. CentOS/RHEL is really big in the business world, and I know a couple of shops that would like to be able to cross

Re: New beta

2014-09-19 Thread Werner Koch
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 20:14, r...@sixdemonbag.org said: > The approved way of building Win32 executables of GnuPG is to > cross-compile from Linux. and best on Debian Wheezy or Jessie. I plan to eventually add some checks into the Makefile to suggest what to install. Salam-Shalom, Werner --

Re: New beta

2014-09-19 Thread vedaal
On 9/19/2014 at 2:18 PM, "Robert J. Hansen" wrote: > >> Does this have to be done under Linux, or can it be done under >> Windows with the aid of something like MinGW or CodeBlocks? > >Unfortunately, this is not something I'd recommend for anyone >except a >handful of MinGW experts. It's techni

Re: New beta

2014-09-19 Thread Robert J. Hansen
> Does this have to be done under Linux, or can it be done under > Windows with the aid of something like MinGW or CodeBlocks? Unfortunately, this is not something I'd recommend for anyone except a handful of MinGW experts. It's technically possible, but daunting. The approved way of building W

Re: New beta

2014-09-19 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Thursday 18 September 2014 at 5:41:21 PM, in , Werner Koch wrote: > If you have all required tools and some extra source > packages in ../tarballs, you may also build a Windows > installer: > make -f build-aux/speedo.mk w32-installer