Hello,
One of the changes introduced with GnuPG 2.1 -- namely, using dirmngr
for key retrieval -- has caused some problems for me. First of all, I'm
not able to use gpg --refresh-keys anymore, as dirmngr requests all of
the keys from the keyserver at once, instead of one-by-one as GnuPG 2.0
did.
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 09:21:14PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> I am looking for one or two people who would like to fill the @gnupg
> Twitter account with some life.
>
> I am not one of those short message people but Twitter seems to be a big
> deal these days. Thus if someone would be interested
"Gnupg-users"
wrote on 11/08/2014 12:54:30 PM:
> - Message from Werner Koch on Fri, 07 Nov 2014
> 17:32:49 +0100 -
>
> To:
>
> "Robert J. Hansen"
>
> cc:
>
> gnupg-users@gnupg.org
>
> Subject:
>
> Re: GPG 2.1.0/Win32: keyserver lookup problems
>
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 20:09, r...
No worries on my part.
> it seems to install software in versioned directories.
Exactly, under /usr/local… and without messing with the system installed
binaries or libraries. Some things, like openssl libraries, it will not link
automatically to avoid some issues with system provided libraries
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:21, bernh...@intevation.de said:
> In https://www.mailpile.is/blog/2014-10-07_Some_Thoughts_on_GnuPG.html
> the Mailpile developers would like to replace GnuPG with something better
> and for the short term propose to extend GnuPG with a command line JSON
I have a reply in
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:59, mailing-li...@asatiifm.net said:
> I don’t have CFLAGS set to anything. Mac OS X 10.9 and using homebrew
> for most things. The only thing I do is run ./configure && make in the
> untarred gnupg-2.1.0. I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s something
I don't know any detail
Hi all,
I'm merging one of my 'old' sub-key into another key-pair.
It kept the same keygrip but got a new ID/fingerprint.
How can I use that new subkey to decrypt something encrypted to my 'old'
subkey ?
Regards
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-use
Does anyone have gpg-agent forwarding working with SSH's recent generic socket
forwarding? Does it still require socat on one end, because I've only been able
to specify a socket path on the left-hand side of the forwarding specification.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
That’s somehow just the result of running ./configure. Running a fresh (fresh
untarred source, no speedo runs) configure reported this for me:
…
configure: checking for libraries
checking for gpg-error-config... /usr/local/bin/gpg-error-config
checking for GPG Error - version >= 1.15... yes
In https://www.mailpile.is/blog/2014-10-07_Some_Thoughts_on_GnuPG.html
the Mailpile developers would like to replace GnuPG with something better
and for the short term propose to extend GnuPG with a command line JSON
interface in the short term.
I've commented the article under the LWN news about
I'm so sorry, Werner. I thought I'd checked the manual. Huge apologies.
On Tuesday, 11 November 2014, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:56, nicholas.c...@gmail.com said:
>
> > Is that still possible? In version 2.1, if no password is specified,
> > gpg2 tries to call pin-entry and as
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:56, nicholas.c...@gmail.com said:
> Is that still possible? In version 2.1, if no password is specified,
> gpg2 tries to call pin-entry and ask for a passphrase.
A quick look into the manual (for me the source, but you may want to use
the online version) gives:
@item %n
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:52, nicholas.c...@gmail.com said:
>
>> How does unattended generation of elliptic curve keys work? As far as
>> I can see, that section of the manual has not been updated for the new
>> EC options, but I presume that it h
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:00, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
> How would the warning be triggered? By the extension of the signature
> file or by existence of a file without the .sig extension, or even some
> other way?
Using an extension is in general not a good idea but in this case we use
it anywa
On 11/11/14 09:52, Werner Koch wrote:
> I think this is what I will implement.
How would the warning be triggered? By the extension of the signature
file or by existence of a file without the .sig extension, or even some
other way?
> That is an entire different thing and not a problem of gpg.
If
Hi,
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 15:22, mailing-li...@asatiifm.net said:
>> gcc -I/usr/local/Cellar/libgcrypt/1.6.2/include
! >> -I/usr/local/Cellar/libgpg-error/1.13/include
>> -I/usr/local/Cellar/libassuan/2.1.2/include
! >> -I/usr/local/Cellar/libgpg-error/1.13/include
>> -I/usr/local/Cellar/libk
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 19:53, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
> In file included from /usr/include/netinet/in.h:22:
> In file included from ../gl/stdint.h:83:
That file is the cause of a lot of evil. gnulib is simply to complex to
use only a small part of it and neglect to update it with each release.
N
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:59, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
> If GnuPG encounters this situation, but file.ext.sig is not a detached
> signature, it could display a big fat warning:
>
> WARNING: file.ext.sig is NOT a detached signature; the file file.ext is
> NOT VERIFIED!
I think this is what I wil
18 matches
Mail list logo
