Not meant as a critique of the content, just pointing out that
it does not explain 'why' and 'what' the card and software (as a system) do
for the reader new to the idea. It may be accurate technically.
Dave
On 17 December 2014 at 00:35, Peter Lebbing pe...@digitalbrains.com wrote:
On
C:\Program Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG\bingpg.exe --batch --gen-key
Key-Type: ecdsa
Key-Curve: Ed25519
Key-Usage: sign auth
Name-Real: Yan Fiz
Expire-Date: 1y
Preferences: twofish sha512 zlib
^Z
gpg: checking created signature failed: Bad signature
gpg: signing failed: Bad signature
gpg:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 01:06, yan...@gmail.com said:
Key-Type: ecdsa
Use eddsa with Ed25519:
$ gpg -v --gen-key --batch
Key-Type: eddsa
Key-Curve: Ed25519
Key-Usage: sign auth
Name-Real: Yan Fiz
Expire-Date: 1y
Preferences: twofish sha512 zlib
gpg: writing self signature
gpg:
Hi,
I am using gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.7 trying to encrypt a file with private key whose
public key I have shared to the partner who have to decrypt this file. I tried
with --armour -symmetric switches which requires a passphrase to encrypt but I
have requirement to encrypt it through private/public
On 16.12.14 17:36, Werner Koch wrote:
Hello!
The GnuPG Project is pleased to announce the availability of the
second release of GnuPG modern: Version 2.1.1.
The GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) is a complete and free implementation of
the OpenPGP standard as defined by RFC-4880 and better known
On 17/12/14 14:43, Haritwal, Dhiraj wrote:
Hi,
I am using gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.7 trying to encrypt a file with private key
whose public key I have shared to the partner who have to decrypt this
file. I tried with --armour –symmetric switches which requires a
passphrase to encrypt but I
Hi Werner,
Thanks for the new release, It solves a lot of the OS X compile problems
we were seeing, which is great.
I'm still hitting a new one though. If you attempt to compile using an
external gpg-agent, rather than one with the package, you hit this:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tuesday 16 December 2014 at 4:36:19 PM, in
mid:874msveem4@vigenere.g10code.de, Werner Koch wrote:
* gpg: Fixed regresion in %g and %p codes for
--sig-notation.
Could there be a similar issue with the %i for --photo-viewer?
