On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:50, 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net said:
> gpg: system error while calling external program: Permission denied
> gpg: unable to display photo ID! ^
>
> instead of:-
>
> gpg: system error while calling external program: No error
> gpg:
On 12/19/2014 01:35 AM, Joshua Rogers wrote:
> On 19/12/14 09:20, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> You don't mention what platform you're on, but given your recent reports
>> in the debian BTS, i think you're using debian. The package you're
>> probably looking for is libgpg-error-dev.
> I'm using
>
The relevant bit is that the code is now public at github, so anyone
interested can review it, and provide comments.
http://techcrunch.com/2014/12/17/googles-end-to-end-email-encryption-tool-gets-closer-to-launch/
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-us
build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> configure: autobuild project... gnupg
> configure: autobuild revision... 2.0.26
> configure: autobuild hostname... server1
> configure: autobuild timestamp... 20141218-193017
> c
On 12/18/2014 05:14 AM, Joshua Rogers wrote:
> I'm trying to build the latest version of gnupgp from the git repo, but
> I'm encountering a problem while compiling it.
I think you mean gnupg, not gnupgp :)
> libcommon.a(libcommon_a-logging.o): In function `set_file_fd':
> gnupg/common/logging.c:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thursday 18 December 2014 at 9:03:45 AM, in
, Werner Koch wrote:
> I don't see any chnage in this part of the code. Did
> it worked in 2.0?
I had not used 2.0 much at all because my email app of choice doesn't
play nice with it (but is fine
Hi,
I'm trying to build the latest version of gnupgp from the git repo, but
I'm encountering a problem while compiling it.
It all compiles fine up until logging.c.
gcc-g -O2 -O3 -Wall -Wcast-align -Wshadow -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wformat -Wno-format-y2k -Wformat-security -W -Wno-sign-compare
-
gnupg
configure: autobuild revision... 2.0.26
configure: autobuild hostname... server1
configure: autobuild timestamp... 20141218-193017
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for gcc... no
checking for cc... no
checking for cl.exe... no
configure: error: in `/var/www/gnupg-2
"primary subkey" doesn't make much sense. I'm pretty sure Robert
means "primary key".
Sorry, a little bit of inside baseball there [1].
tl;dr version -- Daniel's right. Longer version follows.
At work I'm twiddling about with an OpenPGP parser and for various
reasons you really don't want me
On Thursday 18 December 2014 10:59:09 Dave Pawson wrote:
> Running Fedora 21, 64 bit.
> ./configure gave error
> missing ksba
> Downloaded.
> ./configure gave libgpg-error is needed.
>
> # yum install --disablerepo=Dropbox libgpg-error
> Loaded plugins: langpacks
> Package libgpg-error-1.13-3.fc21
On 12/18/2014 10:24 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> My current key is 2048 bits in length and I would like to have
>> something that is closer to 8192 bits in length. Is there a way that
>> I can accomplish this...
>
> Definitely not from GnuPG, and probably not from without it, either.
There are
On 18/12/14 16:04, Duplicity Mailing List wrote:
> It's _only_ for signing, _not_ for
> encrypting/transportation of data
Ignore all of this. I made a huge mistake, apparently you can encrypt
data and store it in the ASCII files, I have no idea why I thought you
couldn't, it's so logical that you
On 18/12/14 15:39, Haritwal, Dhiraj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your response.
>
> About the below command, it's asking for passphrase whereas my requirement is
> to use only keys to encrypt/sign it.
>
> gpg2 -u FFEEDDCC -r AABBCCDD -se supersecret.txt
>
> I tried below command which shows con
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:39, dhiraj.harit...@ap.sony.com said:
> gpg2 -u FFEEDDCC -r AABBCCDD -se supersecret.txt
You asked to sign (-s) and thus it has to ask for the passphrase (unless
you key is not protected by a passphrase).
> I tried below command which shows confirmation screen where I have
On 12/18/2014 at 10:38 AM, "Dhiraj Haritwal"
wrote:
>About the below command, it's asking for passphrase whereas my
>requirement is to use only keys to encrypt/sign it.
>
>gpg2 -u FFEEDDCC -r AABBCCDD -se supersecret.txt
-
'-s' in the above command means that you want to sign.
Whenever y
Hi,
Thanks for your response.
About the below command, it's asking for passphrase whereas my requirement is
to use only keys to encrypt/sign it.
gpg2 -u FFEEDDCC -r AABBCCDD -se supersecret.txt
I tried below command which shows confirmation screen where I have entered y
(yes) & now able to se
> My current key is 2048 bits in length and I would like to have
> something that is closer to 8192 bits in length. Is there a way that
> I can accomplish this...
Definitely not from GnuPG, and probably not from without it, either.
GnuPG is capped at 4096 bits (for good reasons).
Further, you c
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:59, dave.paw...@gmail.com said:
> ./configure gave libgpg-error is needed.
configure shows you which version of which libaries you need. Please
install them. The versions which come with your OS are usually too old.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei.
My current key is 2048 bits in length and I would like to have something
that is closer to 8192 bits in length. Is there a way that I can accomplish
this without revoking my key so that I can keep the same public key id?
Any preferred RTFMing you can point me to?
Thanks
Wayland
__
Running Fedora 21, 64 bit.
./configure gave error
missing ksba
Downloaded.
./configure gave libgpg-error is needed.
# yum install --disablerepo=Dropbox libgpg-error
Loaded plugins: langpacks
Package libgpg-error-1.13-3.fc21.x86_64 already installed and latest version
Nothing to do
Circular error?
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 22:21, 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net said:
> Could there be a similar issue with the %i for --photo-viewer?
>
> photo-viewer "path\to\gpgview.exe" %i /title 0x%K.%t[%V]
I don't see any chnage in this part of the code. Did it worked in 2.0?
Can you test on Unix too
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 18:02, patr...@enigmail.net said:
> I created an installer for GnuPG 2.1.1 on Mac OS X, available from here:
Is that one already useful for general public and shall I add it to the
download page?
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bu
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:54, dominyktil...@gmail.com said:
> I'm still hitting a new one though. If you attempt to compile using an
> external gpg-agent, rather than one with the package, you hit this:
You mean an option --disable-agent? Do we still have this option - it
needs to be removed. gpg-
23 matches
Mail list logo
