Error Installing gnupg-2.0.27 on Debian Squeeze

Following instructions included in documentation, is not possible to complete installation, Last lines pasted below: make[3]: Entering directory `/home/adolfo/Downloads/gnupg-2.0.27/tests/openpgp' echo '#!/bin/sh' >./gpg_dearmor echo "../../g10/gpg2 --homedir . --no-options --no-greeting \

Re: Email-only UIDs and verification (was: Making the case for smart cards for the average user)

On Mar 20, 2015, at 2:47 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > If the followup is just "click this link" then i agree it's probably > encouraging bad habits. What if the suggested followup was an e-mail > reply? What if we require the verifier to sign its outbound messages, > and tell users "don't do

Re: Email-only UIDs and verification

On 20.03.15 20:47, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Fri 2015-03-20 13:43:27 -0400, Bob (Robert) Cavanaugh wrote: >> > One thought to add to the mix: Phishng attacks by having >> > unknowledgable users "click on this link" are pretty >> > successful. Doesn't this proposal open a new threat vector? Y

RE: Email-only UIDs and verification (was: Making the case for smart cards for the average user)

On Fri 2015-03-20 13:43:27 -0400, Bob (Robert) Cavanaugh wrote: > One thought to add to the mix: Phishng attacks by having > unknowledgable users "click on this link" are pretty > successful. Doesn't this proposal open a new threat vector? There are a lot of proposals in this thread, and you didn'

Re: --verify --status-fd separator for multiple signatures?

On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 19:41, patrick-mailingli...@whonix.org said: > Well, I don't speak C, so I can't make head or tail of "what we do in > gpgme/src/verify.c". You should still be able to follow the control flow. That is not different from any pseudo code. > Is there a complete list of all poss

Re: Defaults

On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:19, mue...@cryptobitch.de said: > Is there anything in this listing that would allow me to quickly copy and > paste > (e.g. double click and middle click) in order to further work with the key, > e.g. edit or encrypt to? Sorry, I do not understand you. This is a command l

Re: Defaults

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Wednesday 18 March 2015 at 12:34:42 AM, in , Robert J. Hansen wrote: > Yes. My list was comprehensive ("what the new set > should be"), not differential ("what needs changing"). > :) Whilst I realise you were specifically concentrating on d

Re: Defaults

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thursday 19 March 2015 at 10:19:45 AM, in , Tobias Mueller wrote: > I thought short keyids are dangerous and should not be > used, cf. . If that's the case > then it might be a good idea to fade them out as much > as poss