Re: Is there a “ground-up” explanation of PGP/GnuPG?

On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:33, k...@rdw.se said: > Is there a "from the ground up" good guide to PGP that allows me to > break out of this pattern? You may watch Neal's "An Advanced Intro to GnuPG": Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die

Re: libgpgme-11.dll

On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 03:54, r...@sixdemonbag.org said: > For long and boring reasons I need to be able to call GPGME from > Microsoft Visual C++. The MSVC linker requires .lib files, which are > not shipped with GnuPG. That's okay: the procedure to make them is The gnupg 2.1 installer actually in

Re: libgpgme-11.dll

> Did you install gpgme-w32spawn.exe alongside gpgme-11.dll ? This > wrapper is required due to pecularities of Windows' CreateProcess > API. I did not, and this was the problem. Thank you, Werner. :) ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.

How do you let your M.D. know about emailselfdefense.org and gnupg.org so that it's easier for folks unfamiliar to setup and use than having to go over the too long material, the too complicated mater

How do you let your M.D. know about emailselfdefense.org and gnupg.org so that it's easier for folks unfamiliar to setup and use than having to go over the too long material, the too complicated material? ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.or

Proof for a creation date

Hi, we all know that kidnappers do publish a picture of their hostage holding up a todays newpaper. The purpose of this is to proof that the victim was alive _after_ a certain point of time. I want to do the opposite. I want to make evidence that I created a document _before_ a certain point of ti

Re: Proof for a creation date

On Thu 2016-12-01 21:12:50 -0500, Bertram Scharpf wrote: > I want to make evidence that I created a document _before_ a certain > point of time. One approach i've seen recommended is to create a cryptographically-strong digest of the signed document in question and then post it to a public, append

Re: Proof for a creation date

The easiest way is to publish your code to a publicly controlled source with a signature on or before your desired date. Not sure if there's a *better* way. On Dec 1, 2016 7:43 PM, "Bertram Scharpf" wrote: > Hi, > > we all know that kidnappers do publish a picture of their > hostage holding up a

gpgme 1.8 build failure (again)

Last month I had a build failure for GPGME 1.8 on macOS. I reported it to the list and received a useful answer about a custom preprocessor define that should've been, but was apparently was not, used. Unfortunately I didn't write this down, and the email thread is not in the archive. (Only one

Re: How do you let your M.D. know about emailselfdefense.org and gnupg.org so that it's easier for folks unfamiliar to setup and use than having to go over the too long material, the too complicated m

Don, S/MIME has a lower barrier to entry if it is just for e-mail in Outlook, etc On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Don Saklad wrote: > How do you let your M.D. know about emailselfdefense.org and gnupg.org > so that it's easier for folks unfamiliar to setup and use than having to > go over the t

Re: Proof for a creation date

so GnuPG's timestamping isn't an option for this? Even X509 has a timestamping feature for this kind of use. On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Schlacta, Christ wrote: > The easiest way is to publish your code to a publicly controlled source > with a signature on or before your desired date. Not s

Re: How do you let your M.D. know about emailselfdefense.org and gnupg.org so that it's easier for folks unfamiliar to setup and use than having to go over the too long material, the too complicated m

On 12/1/2016 at 7:40 PM, "Don Saklad" wrote:How do you let your M.D. know about emailselfdefense.org and gnupg.org so that it's easier for folks unfamiliar to setup and use than having to go over the too long material, the too complicated material? = Hushmail has a marketing pitch to Medic