On 11/08/2017 03:45 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 08/11/17 16:27, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
or, more practically, just post anonymously to a blog or website,
using --throw-keyid, with a pre-arranged understanding that the
sender and receiver post to and check certain websites
I did not phrase i
On 08/11/17 16:27, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
> or, more practically, just post anonymously to a blog or website,
> using --throw-keyid, with a pre-arranged understanding that the
> sender and receiver post to and check certain websites
I did not phrase it properly, leading to a misunderstanding.
On 11/7/2017 at 12:10 PM, "Peter Lebbing" wrote:
>How exactly can the identity ever be unknown when we're talking
>about stuff encrypted to an OpenPGP public key or signed by one? That's a
>completely unique identifier!
=
Well, if someone were really *crazy enough* he could send the PGP e
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:50:45AM +0100, Sander Smeenk via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Quoting Ryan Beethe (r...@splintermail.com):
>
> > Well... it happens that when I copy your script to my archlinux
> > machine, everything works fine.
>
> Are you sure your key wasn't already unlocked in the gpg-agent?
Quoting Ryan Beethe (r...@splintermail.com):
> Well... it happens that when I copy your script to my archlinux
> machine, everything works fine.
Are you sure your key wasn't already unlocked in the gpg-agent?
> It also happens that when I copy your script into my ubuntu machine, I
> had to chan