On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 8:10 PM Ajax wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 7:20 PM Werner Koch wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 20:08, aaj...@gmail.com said:
>>
>> > GnuPG version in swdb.lst is less than this version!
>> > This version: 2.2.13
>> > SWDB version: 2.2.12
>>
>> Something went
February 18, 2019 3:51 PM, "Andrew Gallagher" wrote:
>> On 18 Feb 2019, at 20:35, Farhan Khan wrote:
>> Hey Andrew,
>> I was given the message "gpg: decryption failed: No secret key". I ran this:
>>
>> mv .gnupg .gnupg.bak
>> gpg --card-status
>> cat encrypted_message | gpg --decrypt
>>
>>
> On 18 Feb 2019, at 20:35, Farhan Khan wrote:
> Hey Andrew,
> I was given the message "gpg: decryption failed: No secret key". I ran this:
>
> mv .gnupg .gnupg.bak
> gpg --card-status
> cat encrypted_message | gpg --decrypt
>
> This gave me the warning message:
> gpg: encrypted with 2048-bit
February 18, 2019 2:35 AM, "Andrew Gallagher" wrote:
>> On 18 Feb 2019, at 05:19, Farhan Khan via Gnupg-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> How does one utilize *just* the yubikey (or OpenPGP smartcard in general) to
>> encrypt, sign, or decrypt? This might be in a scenario where I only have the
>> keys on
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 7:20 PM Werner Koch wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 20:08, aaj...@gmail.com said:
>
> > GnuPG version in swdb.lst is less than this version!
> > This version: 2.2.13
> > SWDB version: 2.2.12
>
> Something went wrong uploading the version file. I just repeated it and
>
On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 20:08, aaj...@gmail.com said:
> GnuPG version in swdb.lst is less than this version!
> This version: 2.2.13
> SWDB version: 2.2.12
Something went wrong uploading the version file. I just repeated it and
it wortks now (try: "build-aux/getswdb.sh").
Thanks for reporting,
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 08:23:38AM +0200, Teemu Likonen wrote:
gpg-graph
-
https://github.com/tlikonen/gpg-graph
This program parses "gpg --batch --no-tty --with-colons
--check-signatures -- [...]" and prints graph data for Graphviz for
drawing nice web of trust graphs.
$ gpg-graph
On 18/02/2019 06:51, Farhan Khan via Gnupg-users wrote:
> This was it, loading a 2048-bit key works just fine
> Thanks Andrew!
First of all, I think it's a much better idea to generate a 2048-bit key
anyway, so it worked out okay.
But the problem is interesting. Before --card-edit gained its
