Am Fri, 08 Mar 2019 22:00:20 +0100
schrieb Ralph Seichter :
> Seriously, it strains my patience if participants in a discussion fail
> to pay attention.
O.k. understood and sorry for that i only wanted to point
out the disadvantages of centralization etc. while there
are are proper and proven
On 3/8/2019 2:05 PM, john doe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm considering working on a project that has only for now a couple of
> developers.
> As part of that project everything that will be released will need to be
> gpg signed.
>
> What is the best way forward?
> - One signing key accessible on the
* Stefan Claas:
> Well, mail in a "forum" like a Usenet group is there a prefered delivery
> method, thanks to mail2news gateways. [...]
a) We're moving ever further off topic in terms of GnuPG.
b) Once again, the OP wrote about "an anonymous PGP messaging board". I
happen to have created and
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 08:05:53PM +0100, john doe wrote:
Hi,
I'm considering working on a project that has only for now a couple of
developers.
As part of that project everything that will be released will need to be
gpg signed.
What is the best way forward?
- One signing key accessible on
On 3/8/2019 9:15 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 10:09, johndoe65...@mail.com said:
>
>> What I understand is that there is no clear convention.
>
'Consensus' and not 'convention'! :)
> Meanwhile I would suggest to only use the mail address, that is
>
> j...@example.org
>
> and
Hi,
I'm considering working on a project that has only for now a couple of
developers.
As part of that project everything that will be released will need to be
gpg signed.
What is the best way forward?
- One signing key accessible on the release system
- Eatch dev having a copy of the key to be
Am Thu, 07 Mar 2019 16:01:05 +0100
schrieb Ralph Seichter :
> * Aleksandar Lazic:
> > I think the mixmaster approach should be still in place also when
> > you use Tor, IMHO.
>
> I wrote "using the Tor Network as a foundation", but in this case it
> might actually be enough. The OP presented
Werner Koch [2019-03-08 09:15:43+01] wrote:
> If you plan to take part in that nerdy key signing game, [...]
Maybe you refer only to key signing parties as nerdy things but I think
the whole social web of trust concept is very nerdy. It's useless for
most people and I'd say that TOFU model would
On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 10:09, johndoe65...@mail.com said:
> What I understand is that there is no clear convention.
Meanwhile I would suggest to only use the mail address, that is
j...@example.org
and leave out all other parts. There are even mail providers which
demand this for data privacy
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 21:58, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said:
> 2019-03-06 21:25:50 dirmngr[2855.6] DBG: chan_6 -> OK Dirmngr 2.2.4 at
> your service
Between 2.2.4 and 2.2.10 we fixed a couple of bugs in the DNS resolver.
This should explain why it works on macOS, where you use 2.2.10.
Salam-Shalom,
10 matches
Mail list logo
