Operating System: FreeBSD 11.3
KDE Plasma Version: 5.17.4
KDE Frameworks Version: 5.64.0
Qt Version: 5.13.2
Kernel Version: 11.3-RELEASE-p5
OS Type: 64-bit
Processors: 4 × ACPI CPU
Memory: 31.7 GiB of RAM
gpg2 --version
gpg (GnuPG) 2.2.19
libgcrypt 1.8.5
I have just done a fresh installation.
On 12/18/19 10:56 , Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 18/12/2019 09:32, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
>> The -F:: is an interesting hack but Andrew's or my variant works
>> with all AWK implementations:
>>
>>awk -F: '$1=="fpr" {print $10}' | head -1
> Aha, I forgot about handling
Robert J. Hansen writes:
> > Having such experiences more than once reduced trust and sympathy
> > for GnuPG, thus also willingness to contribute to testing or
> > development. But maybe just my expectations of GnuPG as open
> > source software are wrong and my limited communication skills
> > do
On 12/18/2019 10:56 AM, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 18/12/2019 09:32, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
>> The -F:: is an interesting hack but Andrew's or my variant works
>> with all AWK implementations:
>>
>>awk -F: '$1=="fpr" {print $10}' | head -1
>
> Aha, I forgot about handling
On 18/12/2019 09:32, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> The -F:: is an interesting hack but Andrew's or my variant works
> with all AWK implementations:
>
>awk -F: '$1=="fpr" {print $10}' | head -1
Aha, I forgot about handling multiple results. Note that you don't need
head if you're
> export GPG_TTY="$(tty)"
great!
Thx..
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 08:19, john doe said:
> In other words, why '--quick-set-expire' requires a fingerprint and does
> not accept a .
Only the fingerprint is a unique identifier for the keyblock (aka
certificate, public key). Allowing a User-id would require extra code
in gpg and by the caller
On 18/12/2019 07:19, john doe wrote:
> $ gpg --quick-set-expire $(gpg --with-colons -k test | awk -F:
> 'NR==3{print substr($2,1,length($2)-1)}') 1d
>
> I'm just wondering if there isn't a better, programatically, way to go
> about it?
Your awk looks awkward to me. What about this
Hi,
I'm using the following command to get the fingerprint to quickly change
the expiration date on a key.
$ gpg --quick-set-expire $(gpg --with-colons -k test | awk -F:
'NR==3{print substr($2,1,length($2)-1)}') 1d
I'm just wondering if there isn't a better, programatically, way to go
