On Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2020 00:14:40 CEST LisToFacTor via Gnupg-users wrote:
> English is not my native tongue, and the word I've chosen is based
> on my interpretation of the dialog presented by the program when
> generating the key:
>
> > GnuPG needs to construct a user ID to identify your key.
>
On 5/21/20 10:52 AM, Ingo Klöcker - kloec...@kde.org wrote:
On Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2020 00:14:40 CEST LisToFacTor via Gnupg-users wrote:
I suppose you also entered an empty string for "Email address":
`` > Real name:
Email address: f...@example.com
You selected this USER-ID:
"f...@example.co
Mark wrote:
Hi,
> Did a bit more experimenting with it. You can have something only in
> the first name field but it has to be a minimum of 5 characters and
> the first one must be a letter. ..
If you are familiar with GnuPG in command line mode you may try out
sequoia pgp, which I compiled a Wi
On 21/05/2020 14:34, LisToFacTor via Gnupg-users wrote:
>> The proper thing for gpg program to do would be to allow the
> personally identifiable information in the key to be optional,
> and to warn the user generating such key that he will not be able
> to participate in the Web of Trust.
I think
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 03:27:28PM -0700, Mark wrote:
> Did a bit more experimenting with it. You can have something only in
> the first name field but it has to be a minimum of 5 characters and the
> first one must be a letter. ..
*sigh*
https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programme
> First, let me mention that Web of Trust is to me not a useful public
> key verification mechanism, as it is compromises my privacy.
Only if your sigs are exportable. Local sigs are a perfectly legitimate
way to use the WoT. If Alice locally signs Bob's certificate and sets
Bob up as a trusted
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > First, let me mention that Web of Trust is to me not a useful
> > public key verification mechanism, as it is compromises my privacy.
>
> Only if your sigs are exportable. Local sigs are a perfectly
> legitimate way to use the WoT. If Alice locally signs Bob's
> cer
On 2020-05-20 at 18:22 +, Kent A. Larsen wrote:
> I've adding logging to our gpg-agent.conf file, and when these errors
> occur the gpg-agent log file has the following error:
> 2020-05-18 09:36:07 gpg-agent[3800] error binding socket to '\\Neofs1
> \Userapps\Apps\GnuPG\Keys\S.gpg-agent': Unkno
Given the number of people that still manage to create (and distribute)
their keys with glaring mistakes, such as misspelling their own domain
name/tld, or providing a key which doesn't match their email address.
Too many people is sending and receiving openpgp emails by actually
encrypting the co
Thanks I may take a look at it and just see what it does. I'm still VERY
much a novice in regards to all this so just trying to learn more. My
"experiment" with Kleopatra was just to see if I could since it said
"optional" for the name part.
Sorry, not sure who dkg is but have seen those initials
That is very true. I have a friend whose first name is M'Lou and she's
had all kinds of issues when systems freak out over her first name.
On 5/21/2020 6:48 AM, Mark H. Wood via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 03:27:28PM -0700, Mark wrote:
>> Did a bit more experimenting with it. Yo
11 matches
Mail list logo
