Re: Deleting or renaming $HOME/.gnugpg

Hi, On 27/07/2020 07:03, Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users wrote: > Will this scenario work? Yes, as long as you also kill the daemons so they restart with the new situation: $ gpgconf --kill all HTH, Peter. -- I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail. You can send me e

Re: Key-Server Issues

Hi On Monday 27 July 2020 at 1:55:11 AM, in , JACOB EDWARDS WIESE via Gnupg-users wrote:- > If I use the web version > > then it says "Error 502 bad gateway". Try https://keys.openpgp.org/sea

Re: Newbie question.

On Sun, 26 Jul 2020 12:59, Ayoub Misherghi said: > The moderators on this list (I do not know who they are) have been > tyrannical excluding some of my posts; I am not bitter or resentful. I This mailing list is not moderated and thus your post are not excluded by any moderated. The only automat

Re: Passphrase Pop up

On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 02:41, Dmitry Alexandrov said: > GnuPG version 3 does not exist yet. The stable release is 2.2.21. The OP probably meant Gpg4win 3.1.12 which is our Windows installer featuring GnuPG 2.2.21, Kleoptra, and our Outlook plugin. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind f

Re: Why is there no secret key?

On Sun, 26 Jul 2020 13:25, Ayoub Misherghi said: > I am not asked for pass phrase. Right; that is because: > # Lines uncommented in $HOME/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf > log-file $HOME/gpg-log.txt > # The same thing happens when I comment this line out > allow-loopback-pinentry > > batch of the "batch"

Re: question regarding using gpg to verify a file from a .sign file

On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:30, Semih Ozlem said: > when I run the command > > gpg --verify SHAxSUM.sign SHAxSUM > > I get the following message > > gpgv: unknown type of key resource 'trustedkeys.kbx' As you can see by the error message ("gpgv:...") you invoked the gpgv tool and not the gpg tool as y

Re: Why is there no secret key?

On 27/07/2020 11:17, Werner Koch wrote: > of the "batch" option. This option should in general not be used for > gpg-agent. Which, by the way, is documented well in the man page gpg-agent(1): --batch Don't invoke a pinentry or do any other thing requiring human

Re: Newbie question.

Sorry for seeming to be "spreading unjustified accusations". What I said was meant to encourage that sort of "benign tyranny", I was not complaining; or at least that was not my intention. Thank you for explaining how the list works. Ayoub On 7/27/2020 2:08 AM, Werner Koch wrote: On Su

Re: Why is there no secret key?

On 27/07/2020 20:56, Ayoub Misherghi wrote: > The same thing happens when I give the option --no-batch on the > command line. But that only passes --no-batch to gpg, not to gpg-agent. Werner said you shouldn't put these options in your .conf-files. Please just include --batch on the command line w

Re: Why is there no secret key?

The same thing happens when I give the option --no-batch on the command line. The problem seems to have gone away when I moved the config option inentry-mode loopback to the $HOME/.gnupg/gpg.conf from the $HOME/.ngupg/gpg-agent.conf In the final version when development ends, I am going

WKD question

Hi all, I must admit I am a bit out of the loop when it comes to GnuPG configuration. For testing my new Nitrokey I have just install Enigmail for Thunderbird on a fresh Ubuntu system and when clicking on a signed message from a friend, which has properly set-up WKD Thunderbird/Enigmail can not f

WKD - .onion redirects mapping

Folks, Is there any facility in GnuPG, or any neat hacks which can be applied to current releases, to be able to remap WKD queries to go to specified .onion hosts? Eg, lists: openpgpkey.debian.org: http://habaivdfcyamjhkk.onion/ and indeed if I use `gpg --list-ke

Re: Why is there no secret key?

With API I mean something like GPGME. This is what came across to me: 1) It is preferable to have "--batch" on command line even in unattended operation; and not in the gpg.conf file? 2) --pinentry-mode when needed goes in gpg.conf 3) --allow-loopback-pinentry when needed goes in gpg-age

Re: WKD question

Stefan Claas wrote: > Enigmail for Thunderbird on a fresh Ubuntu system > when clicking on a signed message from a friend, which has properly set-up > WKD Thunderbird/Enigmail can not fetch the pub key. :-( Unfortunately, ‘can not’ is not very informative description. Does it return any error?

Re: WKD question

Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: > Stefan Claas wrote: > > Enigmail for Thunderbird on a fresh Ubuntu system > > when clicking on a signed message from a friend, which has properly set-up > > WKD Thunderbird/Enigmail can not fetch the pub > > key. :-( > > Unfortunately, ‘can not’ is not very informati

Re: WKD question

Damien Goutte-Gattat wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:00:07PM +0200, Stefan Claas wrote: > >For testing my new Nitrokey I have just install Enigmail for > >Thunderbird on a fresh Ubuntu system and when clicking on > >a signed message from a friend, which has properly set-up > >WKD Thunderbird/

"skipped: Unusable public key"

Not obvious to me why that is happening: ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ ls textfile ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ gpg -r sentry -e textfile gpg: sentry: skipped: Unusable public key gpg: textfile: encryption failed: Unusable public key ayoub@vboxpwfl:~/testdir$ gpg --list-keys /home/ayoub/.gnupg

Re: "skipped: Unusable public key"

It appears that 3C5B212A55B966881E2D2718A45398B520BEE91E does not have the [E] usage for encryption, nor does it have any subkeys with that usage. This subkey would have been created by default when the master key was created. See if you can recover it? >From your prior message on 2020-07-13, i

Re: WKD question

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:00:07PM +0200, Stefan Claas wrote: For testing my new Nitrokey I have just install Enigmail for Thunderbird on a fresh Ubuntu system and when clicking on a signed message from a friend, which has properly set-up WKD Thunderbird/Enigmail can not fetch the pub key. :-(

Re: "skipped: Unusable public key"

If it is not in my machine I do not know where it is. I did not export it. I did not share it or put on any server. On 7/27/2020 4:51 PM, Philihp Busby wrote: It appears that 3C5B212A55B966881E2D2718A45398B520BEE91E does not have the [E] usage for encryption, nor does it have any subkeys with

Non printable ASCII characters in pass phrase.

Is it safe to have non printable ASCII characters in the pass phrase? ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Non printable ASCII characters in pass phrase.

> Is it safe to have non printable ASCII characters in the pass phrase? GnuPG doesn't care, but your password manager might have problems or your third-party pinentry or... Best advice is to use printable UTF-8. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-user