On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:20 AM Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>
> > *Appologies* Robert for highjacking your thread!!!
>
> I have never understood why people apologize for doing something they
> know is wrong, and then do it anyway. You could see that starting a new
> thread was appropriate; you know t
On 2021-01-21 at 18:49 +0100, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 17:10:31 +0100,
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > For WKD services which cannot control their webserver to disable
> > compression, and automate padding, a better approach would be to
> > pad
> > each published key with an O
*Appologies* Robert for highjacking your thread!!!
I have never understood why people apologize for doing something they
know is wrong, and then do it anyway. You could see that starting a new
thread was appropriate; you know that starting a new thread is easy; you
apologized for your inappr
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:00 PM Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-users
wrote:
>
>
> > On 21 Jan 2021, at 20:27, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users
> > wrote:
> >
> > *Appologies* Robert for highjacking your thread!!!
>
> Can we please try to keep on topic.
Sure!
Regards
Stefan
__
> On 21 Jan 2021, at 20:27, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users
> wrote:
>
> *Appologies* Robert for highjacking your thread!!!
Can we please try to keep on topic.
A
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinf
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 9:59 PM Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users
wrote:
>
> A little more than a month ago I said I'd match all donations made to
> GnuPG from December 10 to January 6. I'm happy to report y'all made me
> contribute 370 Euros, or about $450 USD. The money has been paid and
> is s
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 17:10:31 +0100,
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> For WKD services which cannot control their webserver to disable
> compression, and automate padding, a better approach would be to pad
> each published key with an OpenPGP literal data packet, whose content is
> filled with a high-en
(my messages might not be arriving at @gnupg.org addresses right now
because their mailserver appears to be rejecting my mailserver claiming
(incorrectly, afaict) that the reverse DNS is not configured --
hopefully it will be resolved soon; feel free to re-forward this message
to the list if it doe
Am Mittwoch 20 Januar 2021 09:41:10 schrieb mettodo via Gnupg-users:
> 14 of 20 tests failed when doing "make check" for gnupg 2.2.27. What
> should I do?
Please give more details, like used system, compiler and
what checks failed and how. If it is getting very technical,
the gnupg-devel list woul
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:25 PM Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-users
wrote:
>
> On 21/01/2021 07:10, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 8:02 AM Stefan Claas
> > wrote:
> >
> >> The nice things about OpenPGP amored messages is also that
> >> procmail and friends can be us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021, Werner Koch wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 14:46, Erich Eckner said:
is queried. This resolves to some old address (my DNS configuration
error), which serves the wrong content. Is it right, that this SRV record
should be queried
On 21/01/2021 07:10, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 8:02 AM Stefan Claas
wrote:
The nice things about OpenPGP amored messages is also that
procmail and friends can be used at providers to filter -BEGIN blah
P.S. When Stale Schumacher ran the International PGP
Vladimir Nikishkin via Gnupg-users writes:
There is a nice blog that GnuPG people write:
https://www.gnupg.org/blog/index.html
But there seems to be no way to subscribe to it via standard Atom/RSS
feed.
Is this intentional? Or maybe I just haven't found the links?
There's no direct RSS/Ato
Hello, everyone
There is a nice blog that GnuPG people write:
https://www.gnupg.org/blog/index.html
But there seems to be no way to subscribe to it via standard Atom/RSS
feed.
Is this intentional? Or maybe I just haven't found the links?
Thanks.
--
Vladimir Nikishkin (MiEr, lockywolf)
(Laptop)
14 matches
Mail list logo
