Am 17.11.21 um 00:17 schrieb Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users:
[...]
My question is what can cause this, let's say if you
have a busy and stressful day and would accidentally
carry out such operation, as security professional
knowing such a cryptographic tool for a long time,
I assume.
If this ca
Actually, there is a post in the forum Golem article, how this really happened:
t.ly/1n0V
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Am Mittwoch 17 November 2021 00:17:58 schrieb Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users:
> According to an article on the German site golem.de[1]
> Germany's BSI[2] had sent its private key instead of
> it's public key to a user via email, who requested its
> public key.
>
https://www.golem.de/news/verschl
Am Dienstag 16 November 2021 18:06:02 schrieb Andrew Gallagher via
Gnupg-users:
> On Tue, 2021-11-16 at 18:20 +0200, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> > Am I seeing a starting trend here? Do some people think that it is
> > better practice to have only have email address as user id?
Some email providers off
* 2021-11-16 17:06:02+, Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-users wrote:
> The "Real Name" and "Comment" portions of the userID are mere
> conventions and, if you have an address book, entirely redundant.
Thanks. That is rather technical point of view and correct in that
sense. In my opinion it is a b
On 17/11/2021 14:40, Teemu Likonen wrote:
2. Second "address book" is my OpenPGP keyring. It groups persons'
names, their email and other key data. If many keys don't have name
in their user id it could be inconvenience. Computer programs can
find keys but often we need also manu
Mapping a "Real Name" to an email address is a conceptually different
thing from mapping an email address to a public key.
Except that should we be mapping keys to email addresses in the first
place?
When we sign a certificate we make an assertion that this cryptographic
material is controll
On 17/11/2021 18:15, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Mapping a "Real Name" to an email address is a conceptually different
thing from mapping an email address to a public key.
Except that should we be mapping keys to email addresses in the first
place?
>
When we sign a certificate we make an assertio
On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 23:17:58 +
Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users wrote:
> [1]
> https://www.golem.de/news/verschluesselung-bsi-verschickt-privaten-pgp-schluessel-2111-161073.html
Is there an English translation of this article somewhere? I never
learned German beyond what made its way into t
> Is there an English translation of this article somewhere?
No, I don't think so. To the best of my knowledge Golem.de publishes exclusively
in German and I didn't find anything with a search engine.
> If I go to the link, I get a rather large pop-up dialogue which doesn't
> look much like an ar
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 04:40:46PM +0200, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> * 2021-11-16 17:06:02+, Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
> > The "Real Name" and "Comment" portions of the userID are mere
> > conventions and, if you have an address book, entirely redundant.
>
> Thanks. That is rath
* 2021-11-18 13:22:52+1100, raf via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Real names aren't that useful. They're hardly unique,
> even/especially within a single family.
That continues the technical or nerdy point of view. "Real names are not
unique. Therefore they are not (that) useful." Sometimes crypto nerds
s
12 matches
Mail list logo
