On 2022-10-04 at 20:00 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Autocrypt's focus is ubiquitous deployment of keying material (in the
> form of OpenPGP certificates) so that people *can* encrypt when sending
> mail. We found that one of the big risks is that a peer might
> *automatically* encrypt when
On Donnerstag, 13. Oktober 2022 11:39:41 CEST nect via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > Since I use this key exclusively for commit signing, I can
> > simply replace it with a completely different key if I change my mind.
>
> About this, how do you deal-or plan of dealing- with past commits signed
> with a
* 2022-10-11 17:23:49+0200, nect via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Since I was struggling to choose a strategy for expiring/renewing my
> subkeys [...]
We should ask why do you want to expire (and rotate) your subkeys? Maybe
you have good reasons but I'll remind of the basic question: why not use
the defa
Hello Ingo,
Thank you for your reply.
>You will still have to upload the updated key to every website you use.
So,
> you don't gain much if anything with this approach.
You are totally right, I didn't think of that.
In any case, this begs the question: is it better (best practice if you
want) to
