On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 05:16:10PM +0200, Bernhard Reiter
wrote:
> Am Freitag 23 September 2022 18:19:42 schrieb Louis Holbrook via Gnupg-users:
> > - I would like to use pinentry-tty during my normal gpg cli operations.
> > - I am fine with using pinentry-curses in the mutt context
> >
> > Is
It's not very bad in a curses environment, but I don't like that it
clears out my terminal when I use it from the command line, and I do
that a LOT.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 05:16:10PM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> Am Freitag 23 September 2022 18:19:42 schrieb Louis Holbrook via Gnupg-users:
>
Am Freitag 23 September 2022 18:19:42 schrieb Louis Holbrook via Gnupg-users:
> - I would like to use pinentry-tty during my normal gpg cli operations.
> - I am fine with using pinentry-curses in the mutt context
>
> Is there a way to do this?
FWIW: Probably not, as the pinentry is a
Hi Bernhard,
Thank you for your very comprehensive reply on the forum. It is very
appreciated.
I am still collecting information on the GNUPG problem. I hope to be able to
come back to you with more information this week.
Regards
Christian Roy
-Message d'origine-
De : Bernhard Reiter
Hi Tony,
one way to make progress (here on the mailinglist) is to split up
unrelated topics into single issues, so everyone can dig deeper,
if needed.
From your posts I focus on the KDF for symmetric encryption.
(I believe other concerns have been answered, at least I've seen answers,
if not
Hi Steffen,
Am Samstag 01 Oktober 2022 18:23:19 schrieb Steffen Nurpmeso:
> Highly disturbing to me are such poisoning emails like you write
> continuously.
please be respectful and try to assume best intentions.
> The software you talk about is classified to be
> used by governments to some
Am Donnerstag 13 Oktober 2022 23:50:33 schrieb Phil Pennock via Gnupg-users:
> We need encryption _available_, but culturally
> "encrypt-by-default" is not going to fly.
In some cultures I hope (and guess) that it will fly.
> Almost all email usage locally is Gmail, with the browser app or the
Hi Christian,
Am Donnerstag 06 Oktober 2022 21:01:15 schrieb Roy Christian (DAIT-SITL) via
Gnupg-users:
> Our applications called the GNUPG 1.4.2 executable and it worked without
> issue. We upgraded to GNUPG version 2.2.27 and now we have problems with
> the gpg-agent. This sometimes refuses
Am Donnerstag 13 Oktober 2022 15:42:04 schrieb Teemu Likonen:
> * 2022-10-11 17:23:49+0200, nect via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > Since I was struggling to choose a strategy for expiring/renewing my
> > subkeys [...]
>
> We should ask why do you want to expire (and rotate) your subkeys?
For encryption
Am Dienstag 18 Oktober 2022 09:55:12 schrieb Werner Koch via Gnupg-users:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 08:59, Alessandro Vesely said:
> > > If you see a version number of 1.6.2 or newer, you got the fix.
> > Debian fix kept the old version number 1.5.0-3, though:
The libksba8 debian packages for
10 matches
Mail list logo
