Hi Henning, Am Donnerstag 25 Mai 2023 19:15:19 schrieb Henning Follmann: > Well there was also the initial thought of spinning "our own" instance.
yes, I did not mention it, because I've answered it back then: The limitation are administration and moderation time. For this to work out, at least one more person would need to step up. My idea is that most GnuPG developers will rather improve something specific for GnuPG (or the Free Soft ecosystem around it) than running a fedivese server. > I still hold the gnupg.social dns registration and I am still willing > to pay for it and keeping it current. > I also would chip in time as a assistant administrator. Though I have to > say I do not have any experience in running a mastodon instance. Thanks for both offers! If someone else comes up and wants to run the server, it may become a viable option. (Though I don't know how GnuPG devs think about using the official name.) If this is considered, why not run a Pleroma backend or one of this line. Best Regards Bernhard -- https://intevation.de/~bernhard +49 541 33 508 3-3 Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998 Geschäftsführer Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users