Re: Show that an encrypted message was signed, without decrypting it

Stefan Claas : Helmut Waitzmann Anti-Spam-Ticket.b.qc3c wrote: Stefan Claas : [The ability to check that an encrypted message has been signed.]  It would allow Alice (in her organization), or others, to do a pre-check, with procmail etc., to set-up an auto-responder, informing Bob that h

Re: Show that an encrypted message was signed, without decrypting it

Stefan Claas : I was reading old GnuPG threads were people were asking if it's possible to extract a signature from an encrypted message. I would like to ask, I don't know if this is already possible or if it's planned, if Alice would request from Bob that he always signs his messages and Bo

Re: BSI withdraws approval of GnuPG (revisited after 3 month) [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IusmqH:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: gpg-agent only checks for smartcard not for local keys [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IusfwI:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: encrypt file in batch mode [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004Iusfvy:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: Yubikey keytocard: "Bad secret key" [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004Iusk9k:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

BSI withdraws approval of GnuPG (revisited after 3 month) [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IuseLG:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: How to decrypt a message while preserving the signature? [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004Iusfw8:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: Yubikey keytocard: "Bad secret key" [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IuskP9:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: BSI withdraws approval of GnuPG (revisited after 3 month) [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004Iusj1u:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: Yubikey keytocard: "Bad secret key" [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IuskUi:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: encrypt file in batch mode [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IuslU0:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: BSI withdraws approval of GnuPG (revisited after 3 month) [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IuslwT:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: BSI withdraws approval of GnuPG (revisited after 3 month) [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IuslyU:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: How to improve our GUIs (was: We have GOT TO make things simpler) [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IusXQj:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: How to decrypt a message while preserving the signature? [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IusXat:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: encrypt file in batch mode [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IusOTU:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: How to decrypt a message while preserving the signature? [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IusPUT:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: encrypt file in batch mode [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IusPVR:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: How to decrypt a message while preserving the signature? [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IusPCe:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Is replacing a revoked signature valid? [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IusDJx:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: How to improve our GUIs (was: We have GOT TO make things simpler) [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IusDq8:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: encrypt file in batch mode [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IusLVX:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: Is replacing a revoked signature valid? [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IusDyM:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: How to improve our GUIs (was: We have GOT TO make things simpler) [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004IusEku:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Re: Question about symmetric AES cipher in GnuPG [ ref:_00D58dJQM._5004Ius4eD:ref ]

ibuição ou reencaminhamento são proíbidas. Caso a receba por engano, solicitamos que nos comunique por e-mail e elimine a mensagem do seu sistema sem a reproduzir. Os dados pessoais constantes do presente e-mail estão ou serão adicionados à lista de contactos da INFORMA D&B, responsável pelo

Failure of comparison of valid pub key's .asc files

Hi, My system is Arch linux. Linux myhost 4.4.1-2-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Feb 3 13:12:33 UTC 2016 x86_64 GNU/Linux gnupg 2.1.11-1 gpgme 1.6.0-2 libgpg-error 1.21-1 I have a problem with comparing contents of publick key ascii files from two sources: 1. downloaded from web page .asc file $ cat 0x

Re: What is an appropriate link for IceDove?...

Hej Don, Icedove is the derivate from Thunderbird in Debian, forked because of licence inconsistance. So, if you're using Debian/GNU Linux, install it from repositories, otherwise install Thunderbird. B. Am 20.02.2016 um 23:57 schrieb Don Warner Saklad: > For "#1 GET THE PIE

RE: Engimail & Thunderbird

I have not been able to use OpenPGP since I upgraded to Ubuntu 14.04 on my 64 bit Laptop. Can anyone help? I have other computers where PGP works well: 32 bit Dell B130 with Xubuntu 12.4, Windows 7 desktop -- Sincerely; Michael B. Harris MRAC Secretary Linux User# 1063

Thunderbird--Ubuntu 14.04

. -- Sincerely; Michael B. Harris Linux User# 1063 ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: The bug... More info.

ead of product and they essentially stopped doing it on the governments behalf. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1

Re: x.509 and gpg

yours is the first response I have received and I was unable to make much progress on my own. I will review the material you refer to and will indeed report on any progress or difficulties I encounter. Regards, -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne

x.509 and gpg

-- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 __

Re: Fedora GPG Key Server

This whole NSA blackmailing situation is causing strange reactions in you, sir. Marcio Barbado, Jr. On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Werner Koch wrote: > On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 22:22, marcio.barb...@gmail.com said: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2013-September/003180.html >

Fedora GPG Key Server

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2013-September/003180.html Marcio Barbado, Jr. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Clarification sought on GnuPG v1.4.12

. I intend to use this on AIX 5.3 platform Any help will be appreciated. Thanks and Regards, Suresh B Subramanyam SA3 2F 015, Bangalore, India Ph: +91 80 41772421 ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo

RE: gpg version 2.0.17 with libgcrypt 1.4.6

AM To: Banks, Michael B [GCG-NAOT] Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org Subject: Re: gpg version 2.0.17 with libgcrypt 1.4.6 On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:35, michael.b.ba...@citi.com said: > Another developer and I have downloaded and compiled and built the > versions of gpg listed. I have generat

gpg version 2.0.17 with libgcrypt 1.4.6

Hi, Another developer and I have downloaded and compiled and built the versions of gpg listed. I have generated the keys successfully and when I try running gpg as a test to encrypt a file I am getting bus errors. I have started the agent as you can see below as well. I also did a list-keys

kernel.org status: establishing a PGP web of trust

http://lwn.net/Articles/461236/ Marcio Barbado, Jr. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: secring and dropbox

https://twitter.com/#!/csoghoian/status/98116328677834752 On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Aaron Toponce wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 09:37:09PM +0200, Michel Messerschmidt wrote: >> set pgp_auto_decode = yes > > Perfect! That was the variable I was looking for! Thanks! > > -- > . o .   o .

Re: Is the OpenPGP model still useful?

Hi Daniel, On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 07/23/2011 07:04 PM, Marcio B. Jr. wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Robert J. Hansen >> wrote: >>>> So far, OTR adoption seems unjustifiable, really. I mean, it uses the >>>

Re: Is the OpenPGP model still useful?

What can I say? My situation is a regular one. Privacy and/or authenticity are needed in varying degrees. Regards, On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > On 7/23/11 1:04 PM, Marcio B. Jr. wrote: >> You know, secrets are shared. 100% increase (at least) in "

Re: OT: IM encryption options [was: Re: Is the OpenPGP model still useful?]

Hi Aron, you are somewhat arrogant. Please read what I wrote till completion. Regards, On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Aaron Toponce wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 07:56:42PM -0300, Marcio B. Jr. wrote: >> Hello Daniel, >> sorry for such a delay; this has been a wild JU

Re: Is the OpenPGP model still useful?

Hello Robert. On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: >> So far, OTR adoption seems unjustifiable, really. I mean, it uses the >> Diffie-Hellman key exchange method with block ciphers. > > Why is this a problem? You know, secrets are shared. 100% increase (at least) in "exposin

Re: OT: IM encryption options [was: Re: Is the OpenPGP model still useful?]

Hello Daniel, sorry for such a delay; this has been a wild JULY. On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 07/06/2011 01:28 PM, Marcio B. Jr. wrote: >> So far, OTR adoption seems unjustifiable, really. I mean, it uses the >> Diffie-Hellman key exchange me

Re: Is the OpenPGP model still useful?

e for you, is a question — not an assertion, was on mathematical coherence. Regards, On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 07/06/2011 10:28, Marcio B. Jr. wrote: >> >> Hello, >> resuming this thread because I'm studying encryption options for KDE

Re: Is the OpenPGP model still useful?

Hello, resuming this thread because I'm studying encryption options for KDE's Kopete IM client. So far, OTR adoption seems unjustifiable, really. I mean, it uses the Diffie-Hellman key exchange method with block ciphers. As of what I got from your (Robert) explanation plus some preliminary conclu

Still OT: NLP (was: Re: An Invitation to Neuroscientists and Physicists)

Hacking the mind for fun and profit: http://phrack.org/issues.html?issue=67&id=15#article On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > On 5/17/2011 5:07 PM, Andre Amorim wrote: >> It's Called INCEPTION ! > > There are two major possibilities here: either the poster is correct, or >

Re: Is the OpenPGP model still useful?

Jeffrey Walton schrieb: > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:34 AM, B wrote: >> Simon Ward schrieb: >>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:05:35PM +0200, B wrote: >>>> By the way: Using OpenPGP with enigmail in Thunderbird, I miss a feature: >>>> Usually the recipient r

Re: Is the OpenPGP model still useful?

Simon Ward schrieb: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:05:35PM +0200, B wrote: >> By the way: Using OpenPGP with enigmail in Thunderbird, I miss a feature: >> Usually the recipient rules work but if they fail (perhaps due to >> background update of Thunderbird and not working

Re: Is the OpenPGP model still useful?

Am 28.04.2011 17:05, schrieb Michel Messerschmidt: > Sounds very much like Off-the-Record messaging for every kind of > communication. Or is there a difference I have missed? > Hej list members, whatever you ar talking about with this topic: I like using OpenPGP VERY MUCH and find it VERY use

Fyi: keysigning parties in Brazil

Hi, this wiki, maintained by "Associação Software Livre", is dedicated to coordinate (and subsequently, list) all of the keysigning parties in Brazil: http://wiki.softwarelivre.org/KSP/WebHomeEn regards, and a harmonious 2011 to you all, Marcio Barbado, Jr. __

Re: GPF Crypto Stick vs OpenPGP Card

uot; scheme between them? And if possible, is it prudent? What do you think of that? Regards, On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Grant Olson wrote: > On 12/6/10 2:21 PM, Marcio B. Jr. wrote: >> Hello, >> sorry for this insistence. I just want to get it clearly. >> >> So, y

Re: GPF Crypto Stick vs OpenPGP Card

010 14:55:34 schrieb Marcio B. Jr.: > >> I've never used those external devices, and my private keys have >> always been one place only located, a computer. >> >> That situation is a sort of "trade-off" for it keeps the referred keys >> more protected/re

Re: GPF Crypto Stick vs OpenPGP Card

Ok, let me utilize this thread to clarify something. I've never used those external devices, and my private keys have always been one place only located, a computer. That situation is a sort of "trade-off" for it keeps the referred keys more protected/restricted whereas it gives me little chance

EFF: Eight Epic Failures of Regulating Cryptography

Hello, I think this Electronic Frontier Foundation's text may be of your interest[1]. It was written by American attorney Cindy Cohn. [1] Eight Epic Failures of Regulating Cryptography: http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/10/eight-epic-failures-regulating-cryptography regards, Marcio Barbado,

Re: Gnupg good for big groups?

I guess all you need is proper "read" and "write" privileges management. Regards, On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Snaky Love wrote: > Hi, > I would like to better understand: is gnupg good for big groups? > > I would like to encrypt communication in groups - not instant communication > like

can't connect to `C://Program Files//GNU//GnuPG/S.gpg-agent': No such file or directory

Hello! I'm new to this Mailing-List... When trying to send signed emails with Thunderbird 3.0.4 with Enigmail 1.0.1 and Gpg4Win 2.0.2 on Windows 7 Ultimate, I always get the error message. Curiously, the signed and sent with Outlook GpgOL however works perfectly. Therefore, I conclude on a path

Re: Web of Trust itself is the problem

On 09 January 10, Heinz Diehl wrote: > On 09.01.2010, RobertHoltzman wrote: > > > Personally I think a lot of people care about privacy, but are just not > > > able and/or frightened to install something complex on their machines. > > > > Then you get the contingent that sats "I have nothing to hi

Re: Help!

Hej Jake, you should provide little more information, at least which OS? Boris Rai, Jake schrieb: > Hello, > > Hoping you could help me. > Could you provide me with a link for a GUI version of GNUPG. > > We are looking to decrypt gpg files received using key authentication. > > Kind Regard

Re: GPG executable for Unix/Apache ?

Jan Banan schrieb: > 2009/4/17 Brian Mearns mailto:mearn...@gmail.com>> > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Jan Banan > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am completely new to encryption as well as Unix-server programs > etc. I am [snip] ". And

Re: GPG executable for Unix/Apache ?

Jan Banan schrieb: > Hi, > > I am completely new to encryption as well as Unix-server programs etc. I > am trying to set up a form on a webpage that should be encrypted when > the data is sent to me. I have found a freeware package from VerySimple > which is called simplesecure 3.33 > (http://ww

Re: gnupg on celeron and atom cpus

Christoph Anton Mitterer schrieb: > Hi. > > Does anyone of you have an idea whether it could make problems to use > gnupg on Celeron or Atom CPUs? > > I mean could this have an effect on the PRNG, e.g. that the entropy is > worse? Or something similar? > > Hej Chris, I cannot imagine why th

Re: Keyserver question...again

On 03 February 09, John B wrote: > Hiya gang, > > Sorry for being redundant, but what are some good keyservers to use? The > ones that are on a stock Kgpg setup don't seem to work too well. Thanks to everyone who contributed! It looks like it might have been a good thing

Keyserver question...again

Hiya gang, Sorry for being redundant, but what are some good keyservers to use? The ones that are on a stock Kgpg setup don't seem to work too well. Thanks -- As the Founding Fathers knew well, a government that does not trust its honest, law-abiding, taxpaying citizens with the means

Re: PHP Frontend

zim2901 schrieb: >> >> Ok, thank you for your answers! I think I will do it with the batch file. >> I have another question! I also have to read out the fingerprint of an >> existing key. >> But I have s similar problem, the shell funktions don't give me any reply. >> If I do it direkt at the sh

Re: PHP Frontend

zim2901 schrieb: > Hi, > > I want to create a frontend to generate gpg public keys in PHP. There is a > function called shell_exec. This function, execute a command via shell. But > you can only pass one command to the funktion. > If I start cmd.exe and take the command "gpg --gen-key", gpg ope

Re: export key: access denied

kurt c schrieb: > Ah so sorry, I run into another problem. > > I followed the instruction and typed into my command prompt gpg --export > -a 0x8e758d5f>mykey.asc in order to create an ASCII armored version of > my key and somehow I got the reply: > > "access is denied". > > Why? Why? Why? I s

Re: so how do you get others to sign your key?

Hej Lawrence, kurt c schrieb: > And sorry for anybody if I've been only sending replies to you that I > meant to send to the mailing list :P Stupid me, still clumsy with > Thunderbird. Have a look at this: http://alumnit.ca/wiki/?ReplyToListThunderbirdExtension > And remember my name is Lawrence

Re: so how do you get others to sign your key?

kurt c schrieb: > Well dumb me has another question. > > When I looked at the listing of John's public key from a public key > server, for example (John Clizbe, that is), I saw that he had all the > other people's names listed with him, like Anthony Jones or Tony Jones > or Robot CAs. I suppose

Re: [admin] What is top posting, and why should you avoid it?

On 18 July 08, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > John B wrote: > > That's what the subject line is for. After that, it should be all > > reading as if one is reading a book and seeing things in the logical > > order and way people were taught to read and respond. > > I

Re: [admin] What is top posting, and why should you avoid it?

On 18 July 08, Andrew Berg wrote: > John B wrote: > > On 17 July 08, John Clizbe wrote: > >> A4: Yes, *only* when introducing the text of a forwarded message > >> Q4: Is it ever OK to top post? > > > > A: Wrong, it's *never* correct, it leads only t

Re: [admin] What is top posting, and why should you avoid it?

On 17 July 08, James P. Howard, II wrote: > A minor vent: the problem now is the proliferation of mobile devices > which make it too difficult to not top post. Users, at this point, > are fooled into thinking this is the correct form due to the lack of a > practical alternative. > > Sent from my

Re: [admin] What is top posting, and why should you avoid it?

On 17 July 08, John Clizbe wrote: > A4: Yes, *only* when introducing the text of a forwarded message > Q4: Is it ever OK to top post? A: Wrong, it's *never* correct, it leads only to someone, *again*, trying to argue that somehow it's okay, and still discombobulates everything. If they don't

Re: Enigmail...

Laurent Jumet schrieb: > Hello ! > > I just tryed the plug-in Enigmail on Thunderbird, and it seems very good. > Yes, it is! It' my choice Nr. 1! I really like the per-recipient-rules! Boris ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org

my apologies...needed to test if this gets to the list

a test. -- 911 - government sponsored Dial-a-Prayer. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: 'Tis the season.

On Fri 07 December 07 16:56, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > 'Tis the season for Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, Christmas, Winter Solstice, New > Year's, or whatever your favorite holiday is. It's a time to be > gracious and to remember to say "please" and "thank you", and also a > time for charitable giving. > >

Having trouble building rpm of 1.4.7

Hi gang, I figured I'd try to upgrade and build an rpm myself in krpmbuilder. I've done it before with a few apps, so it's not 'too hard' for me, but with gnupg 1.4.7 I keep getting the error(s) at the end that read thus: RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/build-root-gnupg/opt/

Re: Second problem...gpg or kgpg?

On Fri 27 April 07 13:24, Carl wrote: > On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 01:29 -0500, John B wrote: > > Hi again, > > > > Out of the blue, it seems kgpg doesn't see my .gnupg directory. I > > opened it up the other day just to check something, and it showed no keys >

Re: Un-revoking a key pair

On 06 April 07 09:48, David Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 01:22:52AM -0500, John B wrote: > > Hi gang, > > > > Somehow the other night I accidently imported a revoking thing for > > my main secret and public key pair when I was using kgpg. Kgpg tells >

Un-revoking a key pair

Hi gang, Somehow the other night I accidently imported a revoking thing for my main secret and public key pair when I was using kgpg. Kgpg tells me I need to un-revoke it in the manual editor, so, could someone tell me a quick and easy way to do so, please? Is it possible to un-revoke? __

Second problem...gpg or kgpg?

Hi again, Out of the blue, it seems kgpg doesn't see my .gnupg directory. I opened it up the other day just to check something, and it showed no keys at all. I went into the settings and all it allows is to see my /home/me directory which has a couple of .asc keys(?) in it but had no gpg.c

Re: Weird Error Message

1wing-angel wrote: > I have a computer setup with GnuPG and everything so far is working ok. I > recently sent a "Signed email"(not encrypted) to one of my friends at > hotmail. She responded back, her message came through ok but then there was > an error. The below is the following error. > > O

Re: Manual for GnuPG 1.4.4

On Thursday 13 July 2006 04:15, Laurent Jumet wrote: > Hello ! > > Here, you can download the manual for GnuPG 1.4.4 formated in a > printable way, in 12 pages: > > http://users.skynet.be/laurent.jumet/MyMan_GnuPG-144.pdf Thanks, Laurent! ___ Gn

Re: GPG creates two files?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 razzel wrote: > Thank you very much for your answer! Do you know if there is an graphical > user interface to this GnuPG? > rzzel > Sweden > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/GPG-creates-two-files--t1492159.html#a4045198 > Sent

Re: GnuPG - where is the .exe file???

t; C:\Program Files\GNU\GnuPG\gpg.exe -- Ramprasad B __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnu

Re: GnuPG - where is the .exe file???

t; C:\Program Files\GNU\GnuPG\gpg.exe -- Ramprasad B __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnu

Re: decription directly from texteditor

On Friday 03 March 2006 06:25, smiling molecule wrote: > i am searching for a texteditor whicht can directly safe enecripted files > with gnupg or which can directly open and decrypt textfiles. Kgpg has this editor built in. Just cut and paste the message into the editor and decrypt it using

Re: Delete key from keyserver

If anything needs to change it is that the documentation I can more and more see that thanks to everybody's willingness on this list to explain. That is exactly my point, NOBODY should rely on ANY of that information to identify a key. The only identifier for a key is the fingerprint.

Re: Delete key from keyserver

I suggest that you seriously check our Big Lumber at www.biglumber.com Thanks John. I will. Regarding my personal web of trust: I get a clearer picture now and for starter I'll exchange keys directly with my friends. As for the "unwanted keys" for my e-mail address. At least for now I kn

Re: Delete key from keyserver

Am I missing something? The web of trust. (And the documentation, apparently.) Okay. I got that by now. I think the problem was that MacGPG makes it really easy to get started with GPG: There's a plug-in that integrates nicely with Apple's Mail. And the Keychain Assistant let's

Re: Delete key from keyserver

Am I missing something? The web of trust. (And the documentation, apparently.) Okay. I got that by now. I think the problem was that MacGPG makes it really easy to get started with GPG: There's a plug-in that integrates nicely with Apple's Mail. And the Keychain Assistant let's you

Re: Delete key from keyserver

Thanks David. I understand that technically there is no software command that I could send off anywhere that could fix the situation, right? If you don't have the private key, then yes, right. There is nothing you can do about it. I feared so after I read up on all this stuff. Wow, is it j

Delete key from keyserver

I'm still in the process of learning how to use GPG for signing and encrypting messages. I use MacGPG on, you guessed it, OS X. The interface of the GPG Keychain app makes it really easy to do some powerful stuff. And you know how it is, if powerful stuff is put in the hands of ignorant peo

Re: Gnupg-users Digest, Vol 24, Issue 34

On Tuesday 13 September 2005 10:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > what key are you encrypting to? Got it figured out. I was encrypting with 'my' keys instead of encrypting with 'his' key . Thanks for the help! ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@g

Re: Hushmail troubles...again

On Sunday 11 September 2005 09:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Message: 1 > >Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 01:27:02 -0500 > >From: John B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Hushmail troubles...again > >To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org > >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Hushmail troubles...again

Hi all, I've tried over the past week to send encrypted e-mails to a friend with a Hushmail address from Kmail on SuSE 9.3 . I've got his key on my keyring and when I hit the 'send' button, it brings up the gpg window showing the key I'm using and all that and I enter my passphrase and it

newbies difficulties

Hej all, Im quite new in gnupg and using gpa as frontend. I have troubles in generating keys runnning Debian or Windows: Using gpa with root grants works fine, but with restricted (user-) grants gpa seems to have troubles to call gnupg for generating keys. It simply hangs in Linux and gives 'Gn

Re: IBM to Provide Security w/o Sacrificing Privacy Using Hash Functions

data from the hash. > You can't, but if you have matching data, the hash will match. For example: List A: - Item 234 sample hash: asdfsdd - Bubble 332sample hash: ef2342h - Wonky 093 sample hash: 23jasld List B: - Item 324 sample hash: ej