On 29/12/2015 11:24 am, Francis Le Roy wrote:
> > Hi, > I got a problem generating a key pair, when I run the
> code, it
return a > General error code :/. > If you could give me a sample on how
to gen a key or fix my code it > would be nice :) >
As you're using Thunderbird, why not add the Enigma
On 28/12/2015 10:22 pm, Jay Sulzberger wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015, Steve Butler wrote:
>
>> I see the attached when I do the search in Software Center on Ubuntu 15.10.
>>
>>
>> Stephen M. Butler, PMP, PSM
>
> Well, I see gnupg in the list, I am not sure whether it is gnupg2 or not.
>
> gpg
On 01/10/2015 11:35 am, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 01/10/15 10:33, Bob Henson wrote:
>> There might be a possible exception where there is no individual
>> person to meet - the verification signature with software, say. When
>> you have downloaded the software from the sa
On 30/09/2015 8:58 pm, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> I create for myself a gpg key and want to get it signed
>
> More important than whether your certificate gets signed is who signs
> the certificate, who they are connected to, and so on.
>
> Some people will sign almost anything. People who get a
I'm not sure whether I should be asking in here or in the Enigmail
group, so I'm trying here first - please refer me to the other group if
it is more appropriate.
I've just changed over to GnuPG 2.1.x and have been trying out an ECC
key too. By and large, it all seems to work well (signatures veri
On 25/06/2013 9:40 AM, Josef Schneider wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:18, old...@oldbob.co.uk said:
>>> As I can't run the 32 bit version of GPGex anyway on this system, can I
>>> not just overwrite the existing copy of gpgex.dll with the 64
On 24/06/2013 9:01 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> Now you may want to test it out. Note that I also added an About menu
> which should always work, even if no UI-server is running. The
> translations are not yet included in the ZIP file.
>
Having finally solved my problem with installation, I've bee
On 25/06/2013 12:53 AM, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
> On 06/24/2013 06:18 PM, Bob Henson wrote:
>
>> When I ran
>>
>> regsvr32 c:\Program Files (x86)\GNU\GnuPG2\bin\gpgex.dll
>>
>> it just caused an error, saying "The module "c:\program" faile
On 24/06/2013 9:01 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I just uploaded a test version of GpgEX (the GnuPG Explorer Plugin) for
> > Windows 64 bit. This is just the bare standalone DLL without an
> > installer. If you are using a 64 bit Windows system with Gpg4win, you
> > may want to test this
On 14/05/2013 10:24 AM, Laurent Jumet wrote:
>
> Hello Bob !
>
> Bob Henson wrote:
>
>>> ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/binary/gnupg-w32cli-1.4.13.exe
>
>> Thanks very much - duly installed.
>
> I'm using this for my own, you may find it
On 13/05/2013 10:11 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 05/13/2013 07:57 AM, Bob Henson wrote:
>> I've only just rejoined the list, so I'm sorry if this has already been
>> asked. Is there a Windows binary for GnuPG 1.4.13 yet?
>
> ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt
I've only just rejoined the list, so I'm sorry if this has already been
asked. Is there a Windows binary for GnuPG 1.4.13 yet? I had a look on
the site and the only reference to Windows that I could see was for
Gpg4win, which only uses V.2
___
Gnupg-users
John Clizbe wrote:
> John Clizbe wrote:
>> Allen Schultz wrote:
>>> Csabi wrote:
I have Windows XP with GnuPG 1.4.9 installed.
>>> ...
GnuPG not installed on your system. Please, install it first.
>>> Have you set the System PATH and then tried the installation again? Is
>>> it possibl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tyler Spivey wrote:
> and I can force it with --digest-algo sha256.
Add just "digest-algo SHA256" (without the parentheses) to your gpg.conf
file.
Regards,
Bob
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jack Kaye wrote:
> I have what is probably a very basic question but for some reason I
> can't seem
> to find the answer anywhere online and was hoping one of you GnuPG
> boffins could
> assist here.
GpGee will do it if you don't want to use com
Charly Avital wrote:-
> Bob Henson wrote the following on 12/22/07 7:07 AM:
>> Is there a problem with the server sending messages to the list? Headers
>> are appearing in Thunderbird as usual, but clicking on any message in
>> the list gives a delay (presumably in downlo
Is there a problem with the server sending messages to the list? Headers
are appearing in Thunderbird as usual, but clicking on any message in
the list gives a delay (presumably in downloading) of a couple of
minutes at least, during which Thunderbird reports that it is not
responding - eventually
David Shaw wrote:-
>> syntax. Do I need a full URL, or will just "minsky.surfnet.nl" suffice?
>> If it needs a full URL, how is the URL for an SKS server constructed?
>
> gpg --edit-key (the-key)
> keyserver hkp://minsky.surfnet.nl
> (type your passphrase)
> save
Thanks David (& Ron) for the gen
Two of my keys have keyserver names built in by using PGP's simple key
editing UI. I haven't got PGP installed now, and wanted to change the
keyserver using "gpg --keyserver name", as the server in the keys has
now disappeared or no longer functions. I'd like to either remove it
altogether and not
Werner Koch wrote
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
>> Apologies if I wasted anyone's time - I found the problem. The installer
>> does not force a reboot after running and that's what it needed to get
>> the new files to show up. A note for the developers though, it would
Apologies if I wasted anyone's time - I found the problem. The installer
does not force a reboot after running and that's what it needed to get
the new files to show up. A note for the developers though, it would be
a good idea to add the option for an automatic reboot - most programs do
that if it
I have been using GnuPG/Enigmail for some time. I just tried to install
GPGol into my copy of Outlook 2003 SP2 using GPG4Win, with no success.
GPA installed and seems to work fine using my existing keyrings. I
repeated the install twice, but no trace of GPG appears in Outlook. I
just checked and it
Werner Koch wrote
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:43, Bob Henson said:
>
>> I read some days ago on the GPGee forum that a new Windows binary would
>> be released to correct the change in GPG 1.4.4 that broke GPGee. Is it
>> around/about to appear? I have some files encrypted
I read some days ago on the GPGee forum that a new Windows binary would
be released to correct the change in GPG 1.4.4 that broke GPGee. Is it
around/about to appear? I have some files encrypted using GPGee and
can't get at them until the problem is fixed - for some reason I can't
decrypt them usin
Alphax wrote
> However, the "best" fix on Windows is in the registry:
>
> [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\GNU\GnuPG]
> "HomeDir"="C:\\Documents and Settings\\Username\\Application Data\\GnuPG"
> "OptFile"="C:\\Documents and Settings\\Username\\Application
> Data\\GnuPG\\gpg.conf"
That worked just
Would someone kindly confirm the gpg.conf line for setting the keyring
directory elsewhere than the standard one, please. As far as I can see,
the --homedir command sets the directory for the executable files, but
I'm not sure what to set to move the keyrings to another path to the
standard (Win XP
David Shaw wrote
>> >> >> That's very bad, as I downloaded the official binaries from gnupg.org.
>> >> >> Will there be a different version that supports this new feature? I
>> >> >
>> >> > We don't support DNS queries under Windows right now. Windows does
>> >> > not provide the usual resolver
David Shaw wrote
>> >> That's very bad, as I downloaded the official binaries from gnupg.org.
>> >> Will there be a different version that supports this new feature? I
>> >
>> > We don't support DNS queries under Windows right now. Windows does
>> > not provide the usual resolver library so we wo
Werner Koch wrote
> On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 08:33:39 +0200, Dominique Leuenberger said:
>
>> That's very bad, as I downloaded the official binaries from gnupg.org.
>> Will there be a different version that supports this new feature? I
>
> We don't support DNS queries under Windows right now. Wind
Werner Koch wrote
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:43:11 +0000, Bob Henson said:
>
>> Anyway, thanks to everyone for the help. Now the only problem is to get rid
>> of the bits of GPGOL left in Outlook - every time I run it I get an error
>> message telling me it can&#x
Jean-David Beyer wrote
> I have recently switched ISP, but I also upgraded Thunderbird at the same
> time.
>
> Now when I get a gpg signed e-mail, I supposedly can check the pen? and it
> will offer to download the key, giving me a choice of keyservers. I
> generally pick random.sks.keyserver.
Neil Williams wrote
> On Sunday 22 January 2006 8:35 pm, Bob Henson wrote:
>> I decided to try GPGOL for the few occasions that I use Outlook.
>> Unfortunately, since installing it, Enigmail's Key Management shows an
>> empty screen and I cannot use GnuPG via Enigmai
Patrick Brunschwig wrote
> Werner Koch wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:25:18 +0100, Patrick Brunschwig said:
>>>
Does GPGOL install gpg, or does it modify the path to the GnuPG home
directory?
>>>
>>> Yes, it installs gpg into the same location as the new installer of
>>> gpg does.
I decided to try GPGOL for the few occasions that I use Outlook.
Unfortunately, since installing it, Enigmail's Key Management shows an empty
screen and I cannot use GnuPG via Enigmail at all. How do I get out of this,
please? In desperation I removed all the programs and registry entries that
I co
David Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 06:26:51PM +0200, B. Kuestner wrote:
>
>> all: Joe Smith has no way of fixing the situation, even if he is
>> legitimate owner of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] e-mail address.
>>
>> It strikes me, that GNU-supporters would bash MS (or for that reason
>> a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> If you want a formalised external method of identity verification, consider
>> using x.509 and people like Thawte will provide an alternative to GnuPG's
>> personal (face-to-face) methods.
>>
> Actually, at one point in time I did think about getting myself a "real"
Mica Mijatovic wrote:
> Was Wed, 14 Sep 2005, at 10:42:10 +0100,
> when Bob wrote:
>
>>> I can't find anything in the man page about key import file formats.
>>> Other than ascii files, can GnuPG import any other file formats and if
>>> so what?
>
> Every file containing a valid key dat
I can't find anything in the man page about key import file formats. Other
than ascii files, can GnuPG import any other file formats and if so what?
Regards,
Bob
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-u
Is there a version of GnuPG 1.9.19 compiled for Windows?
Regards,
Bob
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
John Clizbe wrote:
> Bob Henson wrote:
>
>>> A P.S. to the last message. I added the above lines and tried again, and
>>> neither refreshing a key from the keyserver, uploading a key, nor
>>> downloading a new key cause the "clean" to run.
>>>
Doug Barton wrote:
>> Bob Henson wrote:
>>
>
>>>> Put it the other way round - what useful purpose do they serve? I haven't
>>>> seen one yet, ergo they are junk.
>
>>
>> Um, until you actually get appointed ruler of the univers
Doug Barton wrote:
> Bob Henson wrote:
>
>> Put it the other way round - what useful purpose do they serve? I haven't
>> seen one yet, ergo they are junk.
>
> Um, until you actually get appointed ruler of the universe, you don't get to
> make that decision f
David Shaw wrote:
>> Also, these are not "junk" signatures. They have semantic meaning,
>> and are used by many people. Please clarify what makes a signature a
>> "junk" signature. I'd like to understand why you classify them that
>> way.
Put it the other way round - what useful purpose do t
43 matches
Mail list logo
