YubiKeys are supported. You can use NFC key to perform crypto gimmicks or plug
USB one.
OpenKeychain does support quite large palette of hardware tokens.
Paired with K-9 it actually provides relatively good UX.___
Gnupg-users mailing list
On 15/10/2019 21:59, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Should they update? Yes. Is the problem mitigated by an update? Yes.
> But will they? Probably not before wedging their keyring. Given that
> high-profile people in the community have had our certificates defaced,
> it's possible someone will
On 12/10/2019 12:14, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> After 20 years of strong resistance against implementing OpenPGP [1], they
> finally seem to do it. That is a good move.
Do you know why they resited OpenPGP adoption it so much?
Cheers,
Chris
On 09/10/2019 08:06, Tony Lane via Gnupg-users wrote:> It doesn't do
that? Why would they choose to tightly couple TB with
> OpenPGP? If I have to maintain two key databases, that's a dealbreaker
for me.
Dealing with GnuPG complexity is a deal breaker for ordinary users,
preventing adoption. You
On 11/10/2019 19:15, Phillip Susi wrote:
> Why the heck don't they just run gpg the way enigmail did?
They don't want to bundle GnuPG because of GnuPG licence:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:OpenPGP:2020#OpenPGP_engine
Requiring user to set up GnuPG separately is out of question if
they
On 05/10/2019 15:06, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> OpenPGP was never meant to be about email.
https://www.openpgp.org/ tells a different story.
It would benefit the community if you guys stop bending over backwards,
explaining potential users that their needs are invalid.
Over and out. I really
> On 10/4/19 3:35 AM, Stefan Claas wrote:
>> And do those 20 companies business with their customers were GnuPG
>> signatures are legally binding, like real signatures on letters?
>
> _At least_ 20 fortune 500 businesses _that I know of_. Mind you, I'm
not even counting governments.
20? Wow.
On 02/10/2019 00:55, Tony Lane via Gnupg-users wrote:
> This is not an issue with GnuPG. GnuPG is a back-end utility that front-end
> applications (like GUIs) interface to. Go to your vendor of choice that
> interfaces with GPG and complain (...)
And this is precisely why GnuPG failed.
Cheers,
On 27/08/2019 20:50, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> But what would be, when using computers at work or public places, then
> the best strategy for using OpenPGP, without carrying a Notebook or
> smartphone?
The strategy I advice would be to not use GnuPG and look for alternatives.
I
On 27/08/2019 22:41, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> If a computer is compromised, this is game over for cryptography. Full
> stop.
This is not true. Many crypto systems are designed to perform damage
control and recovery in such cases.
If the compromise is game over for the user - it depends on threat
On 26/08/2019 19:47, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via Gnupg-users wrote:
> If one sets URL field on the
> token then just plugging the token when OpenKeychain is opened is enough
> to get the key ready-to-use.
Can you explain what kind of workflow do you mean here?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
On 25/08/2019 19:40, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am curious what apps you are using when not at home, to send
> OpenPGP compatible email messages? Do you carry a Notebook with
> GnuPG or do you use an OpenPGP smartphone app?
Shortly, I know only one combination that
> I must have missed the memo
> describing the exact nature of the problem.
https://gist.github.com/rjhansen/67ab921ffb4084c865b3618d6955275f___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
So I received a public key from a party. I verified it and I'm ready to sign it.
What's next step? What should I ideally do with that signature?
1) send back to the key owner hoping that he will publish it to the keyserver?
2) should I just push it to keyserver myself?
3) what if the key owner
14 matches
Mail list logo
