u
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
--
I use GnuPG (GPG) for e-mail encryption and signing. If you want some privacy,
my public key ID is 2F9D4
g: unchanged: 1
> | gpg: auto-key-locate found fingerprint
> | 64944BC035493D929EF2A2B9D19D22B06EE78668 gpg: automatically retrieved
> | 'de...@test.gnupg.org' via WKD
> | pub ed25519 2016-06-28 [SC]
> |
> | 64944BC035493D929EF2A2B9D19D22B0
On 11/10/15 02:53, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> On 11/09/2015 11:50 PM, Christopher Beck wrote:
>> I have got two sub-keys on the card, one for signing and one for
>> decryption. Both keys are 4096 bit in size. The issues are only on the
>> decrpting process: Signing works well, but
finding the key for decryption?
Thanks for any hints!
Christopher Beck
--
I use GnuPG (GPG) for e-mail encryption and signing. If you want some
privacy, my public key ID is 2F9D4F14. The file "singature.asc" this
message includes contains a cryptographic signature which enables you to
de.google.com/p/theharvester/
[2]:
--
I use GnuPG (GPG) for E-Mail encryption and signing. If you want some privacy,
my public key ID is 2F9D4F14. The file "singature.asc" this message includes
contains a cryptographic signature which enables you to verify this E-Mail
really was writt
On Sunday 15 February 2015 22:42:09 Stephan Beck wrote:
> Hi, Christopher,
>
> Am 15.02.2015 um 20:14 schrieb Christopher Beck:
> > On Sunday 15 February 2015 16:30:33 Stephan Beck wrote:
> >> Am 15.02.2015 um 12:26 schrieb Ludwig Hügelschäfer:
> >>> O
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 16 February 2015 12:32:49 Christopher Beck wrote:
> On Sunday 15 February 2015 22:42:09 Stephan Beck wrote:
> > Hi, Christopher,
> >
> > Am 15.02.2015 um 20:14 schrieb Christopher Beck:
> > > On Sunday 15
ptographic signature which enables you to verify this E-Mail
really was written by me.
Christopher Beck
Gerhart-Hauptmann-Str. 1
91058 Erlangen
Tel.: 09131 / 9245437
Fax.: 09131 / 8148708
Jabber: bec...@jabber.org
EPVPN: (+49 221 59619) - 5232
signature.asc
Desc
I still wonder why, and after my next exams I'll investigate on
that...
Beckus
--
I use GnuPG (GPG) for E-Mail encryption and signing. If you want some privacy,
my public key ID is 2F9D4F14. The file "singature.asc" this message includes
contains a cryptographic signature which enab
ic key
to a given private key, sounds like a bit of reverse engineering. And I think
(and if the reverse task has the same complexity I really hope it ;-)) it
won't be possible.
Another thought: You could generate a Keypair with a keysize small enough to
remember als a password but then I
e key? But think of the meaning of symmetric encryption: This meas, both
keys are the same and there is no difference between the private and public
key. So AFAIK you can't get around using an asymmetric key pair.
Regards,
Beckus
--
Christopher Beck
Gerhart-Hauptmann-
On Sunday 21 December 2014 14:25:41 MFPA wrote:
> On Sunday 21 December 2014 at 12:16:26 AM, in
>
> , Hauke Laging wrote:
> > Am So 21.12.2014, 00:46:40 schrieb Christopher Beck:
> >> Second (and working for everything) was adding the
> >> line "local-
On Sunday 21 December 2014 00:46:40 Christopher Beck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 21 December 2014 00:20:47 Hauke Laging wrote:
> > Am Sa 20.12.2014, 19:20:23 schrieb Christopher Beck:
> > > Third and last, thought it makes sense for gpg to use the newest sub
> >
r example to show, what
happens, if an older, perhaps revoked or expired, sub key is being used).
Thank you in advance and sorry for the long e mail.
Kind regards
Christopher Beck
--
Christopher Beck
Gerhart-Hauptmann-Str. 1
91058 Erlangen
Tel.: 09131 / 9245437
Fax.: 09131 / 8148708
Jabbe
14 matches
Mail list logo
