Re: Making the case for smart cards for the average user

://events.iaik.tugraz.at/RFIDSec06/Program/papers/002%20-%20Security%20in%20NFC.pdf [2]: http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/ECMA-386.pdf -- Joey Castillo www.joeycastillo.com ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http

Re: Making the case for smart cards for the average user

and quite nonsensical from the perspective of the uninitiated professional software developer. [1]: http://www.opensslfoundation.com/export/README.blurb -- Joey Castillo www.joeycastillo.com ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http

Re: Making the case for smart cards for the average user

out a simple way to introduce that person to the tools as well. [1]: https://github.com/josecastillo/signet/blob/master/guidelines.md#certification-and-trust -- Joey Castillo www.joeycastillo.com ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org

Making the case for smart cards for the average user

computing is moving anyway. Of course smart cards aren't some kind of magic bullet, but if the goal is to drive wider adoption of GnuPG and OpenPGP based cryptography, I can't shake the feeling that smart cards are a huge part of the answer. Thoughts? -- Joey Castillo www.joeycastillo.com

Re: Whishlist for next-gen card

old messages. [1] I think this one feature would go a long way to making smart cards a more accessible solution for everyday use. [1]: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-73-3/sp800-73-3_PART4_piv-transitional-interface-data-model-spec.pdf in item 2.4.7, Key History Object. -- Joey

Specifying passphrase for batch key generation

Reading the manual for batch GPG key generation in GnuPG 2.1, I see the following note: Since GnuPG version 2.1 it is not anymore possible to specify a passphrase for unattended key generation. The passphrase command is simply ignored and ‘%ask-passpharse’ is thus implicitly enabled. I'm