s of asymmetric encryption?Thank you for your help.
From: Peter Lebbing
To: Maricel Gregoraschko ; Gnupg-users
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: AES-NI, symmetric key generation
On 11/03/15 18:55, Maricel Gregoraschko wrote:
> One more question: Is there any
s!
From: Pete Stephenson
To: Maricel Gregoraschko ;
gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: AES-NI, symmetric key generation
On 3/10/2015 8:28 PM, Maricel Gregoraschko wrote:
> Pete,
> Very useful info about using --show-session-key to avoid rev
Thanks Vedaal, yep that would be one mighty strong password!
From: "ved...@nym.hush.com"
To: Maricel Gregoraschko ;
gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: AES-NI, symmetric key generation
On 3/10/2015 at 4:19 PM, "Maricel Gregor
had an effect)?
Thank you.
From: Werner Koch
To: Andre Heinecke
Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org; Maricel Gregoraschko
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: AES-NI, symmetric key generation
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 10:05, aheine...@intevation.de said:
>> Also is the
on/decryption (I think implementations even use
Intel-provided code), and store it for later retrieval through a secret CPU
instruction set. From: Andre Heinecke
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org; Maricel Gregoraschko
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:05 AM
Subject: Re: AES-NI, symmetric key gene
th later, was to protect
against future changes in the key derivation algorithm, that would make gpg
generate a different key for the same passphrase, useless to decrypt previously
encrypted data.Thank you for your support.
From: Pete Stephenson
To: Maricel Gregoraschko
Cc: gnupg-users@gn
Hello All,I would first like to thank you for your effort and time developing
gnupgp.I have a couple of questions:
1. Does GnuGP (in particular, the Windows binaries distributed for gpg4win) use
AES-NI, the Intel dedicated AES instruction set? There are some concerns, I'm
not sure how realistic,
