-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I want to achieve the following:
1. A Master signing key
2. A subkey signing/enc pair for my normal machine
3. A subkey signing/enc pair for e.g. my mobile device
What I want to do is to have a different "pair" for my mobile device
or work comp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 13.03.2014 16:42, schrieb ved...@nym.hush.com:
>
> On Thursday, March 13, 2014 at 8:03 AM, "Martin Behrendt"
> wrote:Hi,
>
>> I want to achieve the following: 1. A Master signing key 2. A
>> subkey signing/e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 13.03.2014 17:39, schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor:
>
> what is the advantage of this approach? what threat are you trying
> to defend against?
>
> I'll work from the assumption that you are worried that an
> attacker might compromise one of your ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 17.03.2014 11:34, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
>> The YYY (->a famous three letter agency) e.g. denies to archive
>> content of YYY citizens mails. It is thus perfectly reasonable to
>> assume it does so with all other ones.
>
> This is not a reason
Am 17.03.2014 17:54, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
>> That is an odd comparison. What does a statement about a fundamental
>> law of physics which you can't change have to do with a statement
>> about what you are doing, where you are perfectly free to do something
>> else than you say?
>
> Try some v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 18.03.2014 15:01, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
>
> My other position is that we have to be careful what we believe.
> In these times it's tempting to see shadows and jump at them,
> believing that we're seeing the bogeyman. We have to resist this
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 18.03.2014 19:34, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
> (1) Given how many flat wrong things get printed in the newspaper,
> believing this reporting may not be wise.
>
While this in general is true, I really wonder why you say that in the
current contex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 03.05.2014 05:01, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:>
> And regardless of whether it's a good practice or a bad one, I've
> worked in businesses that have done exactly this -- so it's a
> real-world example that demonstrates the occasional need for a
> thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 04.05.2014 10:30, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
>
> Are there good business reasons for third party escrow of signing
> keys? Quite probably. If you can think of a situation where an
> autopen is appropriate, whether in business or in government,
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 04.05.2014 12:52, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
>> No, there are no good reasons.
>
> If that's an axiom in your system, then so be it. But let's not
> go about thinking that's something you've deduced from principles.
>
Well I haven't heard any so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 05.05.2014 12:55, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
>
>> This is, again, rhetoric and not an argument. I explained that
>> before.
>
> As I explained, you are choosing not to recognize the argument.
>
You honestly seem to think that "We are doing $A, s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 13.08.2014 um 20:43 schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
>> Hi Robert, This looks great. One very minor point (possibly not
>> germane, please comment): Are you discussing the reliability of
>> the NIST P curves for ECC?
>
> No, because that's the first ti
Am 14.08.2014 um 04:32 schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
> On 8/13/2014 5:22 PM, Martin Behrendt wrote:
>> Because they probably will become frequently asked questions in the
>> future.
>
> The questions experts think will be frequently asked are usually rarely
> asked. :)
>
Am 18.08.2014 um 14:31 schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
> On 8/18/2014 2:01 AM, Johan Wevers wrote:
>> And who determines wether it has any "testimonial value"?
>
> Johan, we're entering paranoid fantasy here. If you truly believe the
> whole of the USG is corrupt, and that our independent judiciary is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 19.08.2014 um 21:16 schrieb MFPA:
> Hi
>
>
> On Monday 18 August 2014 at 8:21:06 PM, in
> , Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>
>
>
>> No, the Fourth Amendment protects all people within U.S. borders
>> equally. Americans get no special protections ove
Am 15.09.2014 um 14:10 schrieb Hauke Laging:
>
> I agree. But expiration does not necessarily mean "don't use at all".
> Expiration is not the same as revocation. This is not affected by the
> fact that revocation may be impossible (private key lost and
> compromised).
>
> The RfC is quite cle
Am 16.09.2014 um 12:13 schrieb Peter Lebbing:
> On 15/09/14 21:56, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> From the plain meaning of the word, "expiration."
>>
>> There's a half-finished liter of milk in my fridge that's now a week
>> past its expiration date. (Yes, yes, I'm going to throw it out once
>> I ge
Am 16.09.2014 um 16:41 schrieb Werner Koch:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 12:52, martin-gnupg-us...@dkyb.de said:
>
>> In Germany on food products you will find the word "Expiration Date"
>> which literally means: "Don't eat me after that date." But there is a
>
> Actually you find "mindestens haltbar bi
Am 14.10.2014 um 10:55 schrieb Rejo Zenger:
>
> So, what's the objective of Snowden, you think?
I assume that Laura Poitras never used gpg before or at least Snowden
assumed so. I guess the main intend of the question were to sensitize
her of the topic and make her think about possible threats and
Am 27.10.2014 um 19:20 schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
> Just received word back from a friend of mine who's a law professor
> focusing in electronic civil liberties, and is a former Commissioner of
> the FCC to boot. He's skeptical that ITAR/EAR enforcement will affect
> U.S. hackers participating in l
Am 14.11.2014 um 12:41 schrieb da...@gbenet.com:
> Hello All,
>
> I even tried exporting my private and public key from the command line and
> then tried
> importing. The same error message as before. I have checked on the internet -
> most of the
> suggestions are crap - the authors have never
Am 14.11.2014 um 13:24 schrieb da...@gbenet.com:
> I have cooled.
> [...]
> Sure you can moan criticise me for my getting frustrated - and you can all
> moan and cringe
> and all withdraw your support - BUT NO ONE HAS EVER OFFERED ANY PRACTICAL
> USEFUL ADVICE THAT
> WILL ENABLE ME TO TRANSFER
Am 21.11.2014 um 10:57 schrieb Schlacta, Christ:
> I know some encryption schemes reveal more information about the keys used
> when an attacker has both the plaintext and the ciphertext. In general,
> how much information does GPG reveal in such situations?
Short answer: Thats no problem.
google
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 15.12.2014 um 19:57 schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
> Not only that, but from now until January 6 I'll match any
> contributions that *you* make, dollar for dollar and euro for euro,
> up to $500.
Just out of curiosity, at which EUR-USD exchange rate a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 27.02.2015 um 22:28 schrieb Christoph Anton Mitterer:
> On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 22:15 +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
>> Most people run Windows or Android (or use Lenovo stuff) and thus
>> have anyway no control over their boxes.
> To be honest, I don't th
On 26.03.2015 18:40, Pete Stephenson wrote:
>
> People have raised concerns about the NIST curves, but they are part
> of the RFC 6637 standard so compliant programs must implement P-256,
> may implement P-384, and should implement P-521.
>
> To address potential concerns with the NIST curves, Gn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It should be possible but it might require high technical skills in
the operation of a search engine of your choice.
Lets try your topic:
https://startpage.com/do/search?q=Is+Open+PGP+or+GnuPG+or+GPG+possible+on+a+Mac
Looks like some usable answers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 22.10.2015 um 17:47 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
> Maye some Wikipedia author can give us a hand here and decide what
> should go in there.
>
> (In wikipedia.de it is good style to not enter information about a
> product that I am commercially involved
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14/11/15 20:28, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello, [...]
>
> sig!3 P0x58A2D94A93A0B9CE 2015-03-27
> never Sebastian Wiesinger sig-3
> 1 0x5E5CCCB4A4BF43D7 2015-11-14 never Governikus OpenPGP
> Signaturservice (Neuer Personalaus
Am 11.01.2016 um 17:35 schrieb Lachlan Gunn:
>>
>>
>>> You've already received good answers on your questions, so some questions
>> for you. :) What is your concern about signing the key? And are you aware
>> that local signatures will not be communicated beyond your keyring?
>
>
> I actually ra
30 matches
Mail list logo
