of algorithms? The key is
available on the keyservers. Thanks for help,
Olaf
--
Dipl.Inform. Olaf Gellert INTRUSION-LAB.NET
Senior Researcher, www.intrusion-lab.net
PKI - and IDS - Services[EMAIL PROTECTED
and to enable encryption, one would add an encryption
only subkey?
Olaf
--
Dipl.Inform. Olaf Gellert INTRUSION-LAB.NET
Senior Researcher, www.intrusion-lab.net
PKI - and IDS - Services[EMAIL PROTECTED
? Or does it also occur when you send signed emails
to normal recipients? That would give a strong indication
on where the error actually happens...
Cheers, Olaf
--
Dipl.Inform. Olaf Gellert INTRUSION-LAB.NET
Senior Researcher, www.intrusion-lab.net
PKI - and IDS
server that supports
cryptography would need a team of both. Any takers? ;-)
Cheers, Olaf
--
Dipl.Inform. Olaf Gellert INTRUSION-LAB.NET
Senior Researcher, www.intrusion-lab.net
PKI - and IDS - Services[EMAIL PROTECTED
identification policy
depends on the key that's used. Schizophrenia!
Regards, Olaf
--
Dipl.Inform. Olaf Gellert PRESECURE (R)
Senior Researcher, Consulting GmbH
Phone: (+49) 0700 / PRESECURE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A daily view
trade off between convenience and
security...
Cheers, Olaf
--
Dipl.Inform. Olaf Gellert PRESECURE (R)
Senior Researcher, Consulting GmbH
Phone: (+49) 0700 / PRESECURE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A daily view on Internet Attacks
as a replacement for the ssh-agent?
Cheers, Olaf
--
Dipl.Inform. Olaf Gellert PRESECURE (R)
Senior Researcher, Consulting GmbH
Phone: (+49) 0700 / PRESECURE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A daily view on Internet Attacks
will probably not
be able to validate signatures based on other algorithms).
When I sign a PGP2 key with a newer key (DSA), it
would be SHA1 (even though the recipient will probably
not be able to validate this with his PGP2 program).
Correct?
Olaf
--
Dipl.Inform. Olaf Gellert PRESECURE
on the
commandline, GPG may ask questions, if I remember correctly.
For encrpytion it should work anyway, without questions.
Olaf
--
Dipl.Inform. Olaf Gellert PRESECURE (R)
Senior Researcher, Consulting GmbH
Phone: (+49) 0700 / PRESECURE [EMAIL
and David for enlighting
me...
Olaf
--
Dipl.Inform. Olaf Gellert PRESECURE (R)
Senior Researcher, Consulting GmbH
Phone: (+49) 0700 / PRESECURE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A daily view on Internet Attacks
or planned for the near future? What usage is expected
to depend on this capability?
Cheers, Olaf
--
Dipl.Inform. Olaf Gellert PRESECURE (R)
Senior Researcher, Consulting GmbH
Phone: (+49) 0700 / PRESECURE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A daily
), you have
to establish your own CA (and end up with your certificates
being untrusted by default), so you have different
troubles in the X.509 world.
As always: The world is not black and white. :-)
Cheers,
Olaf
--
Dipl.Inform. Olaf Gellert PRESECURE (R)
Senior Researcher
be fair: Both S/MIME and PGP have
their advantages and disadvantages. And GPG
seems to be on the way to be able to handle
both. This sounds like a good idea to me.
Cheers, Olaf
--
Dipl.Inform. Olaf Gellert PRESECURE (R)
Senior Researcher, Consulting GmbH
and they were transferred correctly (otherwise gpg 1.4.2 should
fail to validate the signature, too). Could this be related to
the signature being a textmode signature (on a binary file)?
Cheers, Olaf
--
Dipl.Inform. Olaf Gellert PRESECURE (R)
Senior Researcher
of SURFnet and DFN-CERT.
Another report about cross certificates and other methods
of linking PKIs was published a few weeks ago:
http://www.dfn-pca.de/bibliothek/reports/pki-linking/
Cheers,
Olaf
--
Dipl. Inform. Olaf Gellert (PKI Team), DFN-CERT Services GmbH
https://www.dfn-cert.de, +49 40
15 matches
Mail list logo