and the issue was resolved.
Very much appreciated Peter!
Thanks,
Paul Taukatch
Advanced Technologies Team / zOS Cloud Crypto
From: Peter Lebbing <pe...@digitalbrains.com>
To: Paul Taukatch/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS, gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Date: 04/26/2017 06:24 AM
Subject:Re: GPG Sig
Appreciate the feedback but I have indeed reread the RFC specification
quite thoroughly and still can't seem to figure out the issue. Don't mean
to spam the mailing list but is there any chance someone might have a bit
more insight into this. Quite stumped!
Thanks,
Paul Taukatch
Advanced
Hello and thank you for taking the time to help out!
I am developing my own implementation of the PGP specification and have a
question regarding the signature generation/verification for Transferable
Public Keys that maybe one of you could help shed some light on. Currently
I create a single
(if one exists within the keyring
already) or is able to reconstruct and place the public key if it does not
already exist.
Thanks again,
-Paul
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:53 PM, David Shaw ds...@jabberwocky.com wrote:
On Sep 26, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Paul Taukatch ptau...@gmail.com wrote:
I had
Hey everyone thanks for all the contributions, really helped clear some
things up.
Was just hoping you could help clarify one more thing. Why exactly are the
numerical values for skey[0] and skey[1] equal to pkey[0] and pkey[1]? Is
it because the numerical value listed is actually the key value
I had a question regarding exporting a private key using GPG.
I generated a Key pair using GPG 1.4.13 and then used the export command to
export the private key into another file.
Based on the RFC 4880 documentation:
A Secret-Key packet contains all the information that is found in a
