On 10 October 2017 at 20:46, Leo Gaspard wrote:
> On 10/10/2017 06:45 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:> (where is the FAQ
> maintained, btw? how is one expected to submit
>> patches?)
>
> I based my quotes on https://dev.gnupg.org/source/gnupg-doc.git ,
> directory web/faq, running `git grep Linux`
+1
The are very few references of "Linux" in the FAQ btw.
On Tue 10 Oct 2017, 16:42 Mike Gerwitz, wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 22:06:17 -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > A request has been made that each instance of "Linux" in the FAQ be
> > replaced with "GNU/Linux".
>
> GnuPG is part of t
But it doesn't have to be XML!
Besides ETSI, the european organization implementing eIDAS has 3 "standards"
(e.g. [1]):
XADES(XML), PADES (pdf), CADES - the last one doubting if it has any modern use.
Why not push them for a new PGPADES standard?
Best,
Kostis
[1] https://blogs.adobe.com/securi
On 10 October 2017 at 08:46, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> ...
> In the FAQ, wherever "Linux" is used as a generic descriptor it is in a
> context where the presence of GNU utilities is irrelevant. Example:
> "there is no single, consistent way to install GnuPG on Linux systems."
> The truth/validity
On 31 May 2017 at 15:14, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> Are the CMS, PDF or XML standards flexible enough that a PGP signature
> could be used within any of them and thereby satisfy the legislation?
IANAL, but I would agree with Reiner that the implementing acts are not
technology-neutral.
More detaile
Thank you for your efforts.
Would it be possible with the next release to build also the python-2
& 3 bindings for Windows?
Best,
Kostis Anagnostopoulos
On 1 March 2017 at 20:27, Werner Koch wrote:
> Hello!
>
> The GnuPG team is pleased to announce the availability of a new release
> of GnuPG:
Hi,
I'm wondering whether this open-source Chrome-extension for GPG on GMail[1]
is to be trusted; I mean, not to call home with my secret-key and passphrase.
I searched through the mailing-list archives and found only one
reference from 2014:
https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2014-Apr
Maybe that's an opportunity to put to use "notations
, and self-sign the keybase-uidusing --cert-notation.
Of course, nobody would care to check that,
but would there be any other issue down this road?
Kind Regards,
Kostis
On 25 January 2017 at 23:39, Felix Van der Jeugt <
felix.vanderje...@gm
On 24 January 2017 at 11:46, Justus Winter wrote:
> ankostis writes:
>
> > On 23 January 2017 at 16:28, Jerry wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 01:06:38 +0100, ankostis stated:
> >>
> >> >Has anybody managed to compile pyme3 on Wi
On 23 January 2017 at 16:28, Jerry wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 01:06:38 +0100, ankostis stated:
>
> >Has anybody managed to compile pyme3 on Windows?
> >
> >Thanks for all the Hard Work,
> > Kostis
> >
>
> I don't know if this is what yo are lo
Has anybody managed to compile pyme3 on Windows?
Thanks for all the Hard Work,
Kostis
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
11 matches
Mail list logo
