On 05/08/17 12:44, Stefan Claas wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Aug 2017 11:30:08 +0100, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>
>> Hello Stefan,
>>
>> Firstly the "<" did the trick - I used QtQr - to decode back and then
>> to decrypt Kleopatra - and it worked fine QtQR c
On 05/08/17 09:04, Stefan Claas wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Aug 2017 02:55:39 +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
>> On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 23:13:26 +0100, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>>
>>> (8) zbarimg can display a png like any other but seems not capable
>>> of converting it back to i
On 04/08/17 13:46, Stefan Claas wrote:
> zbarimg image.jpg > output.txt && sed "s/QR-Code:-/-/g" output.txt
Hello,
I decided to follow your instructions:
(1) I encrypted some text file size 1569 bytes
(2) I ran qrencode -o david.png david.asc
(3) Got david.png 291 bytes
(4) I ran your command zba
Hi All,
I was sharing thoughts on AI in Linux facebook and Sean Rickerd shared this link
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/10/google-ai-neural-network-cryptography/
David
--
“See the sanity of the man! No gods, no angels, no demons, no body. Nothing of
the
kind.Stern, sane,ev
On 14/07/17 15:01, Daniel Villarreal wrote:
> On 07/14/17 04:59, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
Thank you for your contributions Daniel and Robert
Best Wishes
David
--
“See the sanity of the man! No gods, no angels, no demons, no body. Nothing of
the
kind.Stern, sane,every brain-cell perfect
Hi All,
I want to back up and move all the keys I have - without moving the whole
directory - I have
gpa kgpg and Kleopatra but none of these as far as I can see back up all your
keys.
Help appreciated and thanks
David
--
“See the sanity of the man! No gods, no angels, no demons, no body. No
On 04/02/16 09:29, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Out of curiosity - have you reviewed the latest version of ESD?
>
> The FSF asked Patrick Brunschwig and me to review it prior to
> publication. I don't know if Patrick turned in criticisms; I gave a
> couple of pages' worth. I'm pleased with the end
On 04/02/16 08:56, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> I propose to explain the different key in the keyring:
>
> As near as I can tell, this question isn't asked very frequently. If
> the opinion of the list is that it is, though, I'll certainly add it.
> What say y'all?
>
>
Apparently the founder of the Debian project, Ian Murdock, has died
[1]. There is some interesting discussion on Reddit, especially the link
to his last tweets [2].
This is very sad news, especially given the alleged circumstances.
[1] https://blog.docker.com/2015/12/ian-murdock/
[2]
https://www
-- http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-35058761
David
“See the sanity of the man! No gods, no angels, no demons, no body. Nothing of
the
kind.Stern, sane,every brain-cell perfect and complete even at the moment of
death. No
delusion.” https://linuxcounter.net/user/512854.html - http://gbenet.com
si
On 05/12/15 19:33, Dark Penguin wrote:
> I wanted to report a few bugs in GPA that I've been getting on Debian
> Squeeze, but I thought
> I should check if they still exist in the latest version. So, I've installed
> Debian Jessie
> and got the latest release (0.9.9) to see if there was any impro
On 16/11/15 15:01, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> my key is not bad, the signature by 0x5E5CCCB4A4BF43D7 is bad. The
> question is why.
>
> Regards
>
> Sebastian
>
Hello Sebastian,
I downloaded the key and all sub-keys. Neither GPA Kgpg or Kleopatra give any
warnings
about this ke
On 14/11/15 20:28, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> for fun I tried a German government (or public-private partnership)
> service that signs your PGP key if your name on a uid matches the
> electronic data on your ID card (Neuer Personalausweis, nPA). I tried
> this and got my signed key ba
listo factor:
> On 10/06/2015 02:07 PM, Robert J. Hansen - r...@sixdemonbag.org wrote:
>> Australian researchers have figured out how to make a quantum gate on a
>> silicon chip. [...] there's absolutely nothing to panic over.
>
> Yup, instead of panicking, we should simply acknowledge the fact
>
da...@gbenet.com:
> Hello All,
>
> Am getting a strange message when signing e-mails - Enigmail says my key can
> not be found or
> a sub-key has expired. Yet Enigmail Kleopatra and Kgpg all show my key - and
> it has no
> expiry date set in any of the main or sub-keys.
Hello All,
Am getting a strange message when signing e-mails - Enigmail says my key can
not be found or
a sub-key has expired. Yet Enigmail Kleopatra and Kgpg all show my key - and it
has no
expiry date set in any of the main or sub-keys.
I'm using Linux Lubuntu Thunderbird 38.3 Enigmail 1.8.2
On 19/03/15 22:32, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Thursday 19 March 2015 09:18:03 Thomas F. Ruddy wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I'd be interested in hearing Werner Koch's take on this recent
>> innovation. Werner, you speak German:
>>
>> A new "Everyman's software" featuring certification, key servers,
>> cu
On 18/03/15 12:18, Mark Walter wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I'm having issues with encrypt and decrypt and I know it's something I'm
> doing wrong. I created a key with Kelopatra. Imported it into GNU Privacy
> Assistant. It shows up as Fully Valid.
>
> Next, to test, I created the text file test.tx
27;s key through
> video conferencing is less secure but at the same time it's an effective
> solution for remote areas. I think key signing through video conferencing,
> might help in reducing 'crypto divide' (like that in 'digital divide'). :)
>
> Regar
On 02/12/14 08:27, Robin Mathew Rajan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Where can I get my keys signed? Does here anyone provide keysigning services
> through video conference? :)
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Robin Mathew Rajan
>
> ___
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnu
On 26/11/14 19:52, Tristan Santore wrote:
> On 26/11/14 19:37, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> Hi Al,
>>
>> As so many have been aware, I tried LUbuntu amd64 LXDE with Thunderbird and
>> Enigmail - which
>> singularly failed to sign or even encrypt. I made add that K
Hi Al,
As so many have been aware, I tried LUbuntu amd64 LXDE with Thunderbird and
Enigmail - which
singularly failed to sign or even encrypt. I made add that Kleopatra Kgpg GPA
also failed to
work.
As some of you are stuck with the mind-set that the earth is flat eg "Oh it
works for me
there
On 17/11/14 23:06, Paul R. Ramer wrote:
> On November 15, 2014 10:02:44 AM PST, Samir Nassar
> wrote:
>> For those of you who come to David's post in the future through the
>> mailing
>> list archive: Disregard this misconception. Many of us, myself
>> included, use
>> gpg2 on a 64bit system wi
Having spent many many days on this problem I have failed to come with any
working solution.
Running a 64 bit version of LUbuntu does not work. This is a real fact of life
no matter
what all you people say. It does not work for me. I have tried Fedora-16 64 bit
in the past
- it failed - I tried
On 16/11/14 16:54, Philip Jackson wrote:
> On 16/11/14 05:59, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> Werner,
>>
>> I have partly resolved the problem - which seems to be related to gnupg2
>> Thunderbird and
>> Enigmail running on a 64 bit Linux. The only error message am now
On 16/11/14 09:43, Gabriel Niebler wrote:
> David,
>
> it is not a gpg2 problem and it is also not relatd to modern versions
> of your mail programmes. In my case Thunderbird 31.2 with
> Enigmail 1.7 runs just fine with GnuPG 1.4.16. I also have GnuPG
> 2.0.22 installed as gpg2, but I'm not active
> At the next write access to the keyring v3 keys are removed.
>
> David send me one of his mails privately without mentioning that he also
> send he to the ML :-(. I looked at it anyway; see below.
>
>
> Salam-Shalom,
>
>Werner
>
>
> On Sa
Hi All,
The problem is with gpg2 on a 64 bit O/S I removed gpg2 and also lost GPA and
Kleopatra and
Kgpg no longer runs on my 64 bit Linux.
Now my only error is "bad passphrase." Which I can not change from the terminal.
Also as I recall the problem is with Enigmail - I have to install a versio
On 15/11/14 17:16, Paul R. Ramer wrote:
> On November 15, 2014 3:52:02 AM PST, "da...@gbenet.com"
> wrote:
> [snip]
>> david@laptop-1:/media/david/store$ gpg -ao --import
>> --allow-non-selfsigned-uid david-public.key
>> gpg: armour header: Version: Gn
On 15/11/14 17:00, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> On 15.11.14 12:52, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> The steps I have taken to move my /.gnupg folder
>>
>> Background:
>>
>> I have two laptops (1) a 32 bit LXD laptop-1 (2) a 64 bit LXD
>> laptop-2 one mouse and
On 15/11/14 15:17, MFPA wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Thursday 13 November 2014 at 10:33:31 PM, in
> , da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>
>
>> I exported my keys to a USB stick. Then I copied my
>> .gnupg to a new Linux laptop. Then I imported my keys.
>> I thought th
On 15/11/14 12:36, Johannes Zarl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday 15 November 2014 11:52:02 da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> Laptop-1 and laptop-2 are a mirror image of each. They contain the same
>> software. I copied programmes like Thunderbird Firefox from laptop-1 to
>> la
agent running and available
david@laptop-1:~$
(5) Then I discovered failings within Thunderbird/Enigmail - I did various test
e-mails
skip...@gbenet.com to postmas...@gbenet.com ad...@bikermates.org to
da...@gbenet.com - all
failed to support signing all failed to support encryption.
(6) I t
On 14/11/14 11:56, Nicole Faerber wrote:
> Oh please, I am using gnupg with the same keys on at least five
> machines with no issue.
>
> I simply copied the .gnupg directory, end of story.
>
> Cheers
> nicole
>
>
> Am 14.11.2014 um 12:45 schrieb da...@gb
On 14/11/14 13:38, Gabriel Niebler wrote:
> Dear David, dear fellow GnuPG users,
>
> this conversation made me curious, so I tried to do it myself. Here's
> what I did on my work laptop, just now, five minutes ago (in my home dir):
>
> $ rm -rf .gnupg
> $ scp -r ${myfileserver}:${pathtobackupsfro
On 14/11/14 13:31, Johan Wevers wrote:
> On 14-11-2014 13:24, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>
>> I have cooled. You can export your private key - you can export your public
>> key.
>
> I've never done that, except when I imported my old pgp 2.x keys in
> GnuPG a lo
On 14/11/14 13:11, NdK wrote:
> Il 14/11/2014 13:24, da...@gbenet.com ha scritto:
>
>> I have cooled. You can export your private key - you can export your public
>> key. You can
>> import your private key you can import your public key. In 20 years I have
>>
On 14/11/14 13:14, Johan Wevers wrote:
> On 14-11-2014 12:45, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>
>> I have done everything correctly
>
> Apparently not. Or maybe the files are corrupted? Do they still work on
> the original computer?
>
>> - and my conclusions are
On 14/11/14 12:46, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:34, nicholas.c...@gmail.com said:
>
>> I'm sorry you are having problems, but I think this is just nonsense.
>> Of course people move keys between machines all the time. I have done
>
> Right. And you may even copy it from one OS to
On 14/11/14 12:41, Tristan Santore wrote:
> On 14/11/14 13:24, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> On 14/11/14 11:55, Martin Behrendt wrote:
>>> Am 14.11.2014 um 12:41 schrieb da...@gbenet.com:
>>>> Hello All,
>>>>
>>>> I even tried exporting my priva
On 14/11/14 12:37, Samir Nassar wrote:
> David,
>
> It might not be clear, but many of us have easily and simply migrated our
> .gnupg directories from computer to computer.
>
> I've even deleted my .gnupg directory and restored it from backups. I've
> intentionally messed up my private key and
On 14/11/14 12:15, Jason Antony wrote:
> On 2014-11-14 22:45, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>
>> I have done everything correctly - and my conclusions are still
>> the same NO ONE HAS EVER SUCCESSFULLY MADE A MIRROR COPY OF THEIR
>> .GNUPG AND HAD A FULLY 100 PER CENT WORKIN
On 14/11/14 11:47, NdK wrote:
> Il 14/11/2014 12:41, da...@gbenet.com ha scritto:
>
> I usually just lurk, but that's too much...
>
>> I even tried exporting my private and public key from the command line and
>> then tried
>> importing. The same error messa
On 14/11/14 15:28, Jason Antony wrote:
> On 2014-11-14 09:33, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>
>> But I get the following error when signing my mail: "Key 0xAAd8C47D
>> not found or not valid. The (sub-)key might have expired." The key
>> is visible in Enigmail Kgpg Kle
On 14/11/14 11:55, Martin Behrendt wrote:
> Am 14.11.2014 um 12:41 schrieb da...@gbenet.com:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I even tried exporting my private and public key from the command line and
>> then tried
>> importing. The same error message as before. I have chec
use -- certainly not someone who has put years of work into a
> program that is an industry standard and released it for free.
>
> Nicholas
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:42 AM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> After spending 62 hours on what I thought wo
Hello All,
I even tried exporting my private and public key from the command line and then
tried
importing. The same error message as before. I have checked on the internet -
most of the
suggestions are crap - the authors have never ever tried to do what they
suggest others to
do. If they had d
Hi All,
After spending 62 hours on what I thought would be a simple task namely to get
a fully
functioning gnupg mirror on my 64 bit Linux system - I realise this is an
impossible task to
do. In the past I've ended up creating a new set of certificates - but this
time round I
thought that I wou
cise information.
>
> On 11/13/2014 04:31 PM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> Even when I use a backup programme and restore I still get the same error
>> message.
>
> What backup program did you use? What version of gnupg were you using
> on your old computer? what plat
On 14/11/14 00:55, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/13/14 3:59 PM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> On 13/11/14 22:42, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 11/13/14 2:33 PM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> Background:
>>>>
>>>>
On 14/11/14 00:55, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/13/14 3:59 PM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> On 13/11/14 22:42, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 11/13/14 2:33 PM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> Background:
>>>>
>>>>
On 13/11/14 22:42, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 11/13/14 2:33 PM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Background:
>>
>> I exported my keys to a USB stick. Then I copied my .gnupg to a new
>> Linux laptop. Then I imported my keys. I thought that I would b
On 13/11/14 22:42, Hauke Laging wrote:
> Am Do 13.11.2014, 22:33:31 schrieb da...@gbenet.com:
>
>> I exported my keys to a USB stick. Then I copied my .gnupg to a new
>> Linux laptop. Then I imported my keys. I thought that I would be
>> fine.
>
> It is unclear to m
Hi All,
Background:
I exported my keys to a USB stick. Then I copied my .gnupg to a new Linux
laptop. Then I
imported my keys. I thought that I would be fine.
But I get the following error when signing my mail: "Key 0xAAd8C47D not found
or not valid.
The (sub-)key might have expired." The key
Free Software Foundation
Free Software Foundation statement on the GNU Bash "shellshock"
vulnerability
/This post can be viewed online at
https://fsf.org/news/free-software-foundation-statement-on-the-gnu-bash-shellshock-vulnerability./
A major security vulnerability has been discovered in
On 24/09/14 16:24, Vera van der Werff wrote:
> Dear Sir/Madam,
>
> Recently, I have installed GnuPG for Windows 8.1. I have made a public key
> (personal Open
> PGP keypair). I have sent the public key to one of my contacts and he had
> send me his public
> key. When I try to import his certific
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- Original Message
Subject:GNU hackers discover HACIENDA government surveillance and give
us a way to fight back
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:02:21 -0400
From: Free Software Foundation
Reply-To: Free Software Found
On 17/08/14 08:57, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 16.08.2014, Kristy Chambers wrote:
>
>> Sorry for that crap subject. I just want to leave this.
> []
>
> The use of PGP/GPG depends entirely on the respective needs and
> and context. For me, it has been working perfectly in many years, and
> thus,
Hauke,
Yesterday whilst figuring out what to do, I found that I was logged out - my
Linux box
refused to accept my password.
Anyway having copied the contents of my home directory - I reinstalled LXDE.
Then slowly
configured. I installed gpg2 - created the directory and associated files and
th
On 12/08/14 08:17, Hauke Laging wrote:
> Am Mo 11.08.2014, 09:10:23 schrieb da...@gbenet.com:
>
>> Am getting the following msg now
>> Error - key extraction command failed
>> /usr/bin/gpg --charset utf-8 --display-charset utf-8 --batch --no-tty
>> --status-fd 2
Hi All,
I am stuck,
I need a working copy of gpg-agent.conf and a working copy of gpg.conf - for a
Linux system.
Am still failing to sign and encrypt.
Thanks
David
--
“See the sanity of the man! No gods, no angels, no demons, no body. Nothing of
the
kind.Stern, sane,every brain-cell perfec
On 10/08/14 20:48, Hauke Laging wrote:
> Am So 10.08.2014, 20:39:26 schrieb da...@gbenet.com:
>
>> david@laptop1:~$ gpg-agent --daemon
>> GPG_AGENT_INFO=/tmp/gpg-6uIYXp/S.gpg-agent:1874:1; export
>
> You obviously have not set
> use-standard-socket
> in
On 10/08/14 15:44, Hauke Laging wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am So 10.08.2014, 08:13:12 schrieb da...@gbenet.com:
>
>> Since this upgrade
>
> I have no idea why the upgrade may have caused this.
>
>
>> Also KGpg comes up with the following error Gnupg failed to
Hi All,
Am at a loss now. I've Thunderbird 31 and Enigmail 1.7
Since this upgrade I've had various issues - unable to sign unable to encrypt -
I get an
error message from Enigmail "Error - bad passphrase" - when I've not even
entered it at the
time.
Also KGpg comes up with the following error
On 27/07/14 23:51, pedro.mar...@ml1.net wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm a new user to the GPG world, and i haven't find information about the
> "CRC" error when
> importing a key.
>
> What does CRC means?
>
> When importing a corrupted key the following message apears:
>
> gpg: CRC error; 9BAD9F - 00F1D7
On 12/07/14 17:22, Ingo Kl�cker wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Saturday 12 July 2014 09:02:09 da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
> [snip]
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/07/14 14:10, Philip Jackson wrote:
> On 11/07/14 11:45,
da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> In what folder does gpg4win store it's gpa.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
In what folder does gpg4win store it's gpa.conf and pubring.gpg
files?
Thanks
David
- --
“See the sanity of the man! No gods, no angels, no demons, no body.
Nothing of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello All,
I've just created a new key pair - the older one gets you realise you will not
live forever!
So import and be happy!
David
- --
https://linuxcounter.net/user/512854.html - http://gbenet.com/blog - cryptology
- for
books howto's - mail
Hi All,
I have revoked my public and private key DF951131 (postmas...@gbenet.com) and
sent a
revocation certificate to key servers - if you see it's been revoked after the
update you
can delete the key. Over the next few days I will create another.
David
--
https://linuxcounter.net/user/512854
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/06/12 16:54, David Chadwick wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I was demonstrating GPA for the first time to a class of students yesterday
> and a very
> strange thing happened. (Note that I am new to GPA, having used OpenPGP for
> the last
> 10 years, so I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/06/12 21:42, Anthony Papillion wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I'm having a devil of a time with Ubuntu 11.04 with GnuPG and need a bit
> of help. This MIGHT be a problem with the Enigmail plugin but I think
> it's probably something to do with my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/06/12 13:15, . wrote:
> Does anyone have a GUI that will accomplish all key management and also
> provide for easy file encrypt/decrypt/verify signature etc, etc?
You could try Kleopatra or GPA but Enigmail/Openpgp does all that the others
ca
trust (self-signatures and other signatures as
> you said in your email ) and covers other aspects of how GPG works with
> regards to the PGP model?
>
>
>
>> From: w...@gnupg.org
>> To: smick...@hotmail.com
>> CC: da...@gbenet.com; gnupg-users@gnupg.org
>> Subjec
ave actually met the signer
> of face to face, right?
>
>
> Do I understand correctly. Is this all accurate? With this behavior, would I
> be doing Best Practices and what you guys all do?
>
>
> Thanks for the instruction, guys. I appreciate the time and energy you guys
&
information. So technically there's
> no guarantee I'm actually interacting with teh GnuPG.org website.
>
>
>
>> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 05:23:43 +0100
>> From: da...@gbenet.com
>> To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
>> Subject: Re: can someone verify the gnupg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/12 17:14, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 6/7/12 11:18 AM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> To put matters simply, (1) Verner's key is not the same as gnupg's key (2)
>> You can
>> confirm the validity of Verner&#
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/12 14:17, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 07/06/12 06:23, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> Clearly you failed to follow my link and clearly you failed to check the
>> public key for gnupg. Now being a little confused try and get a clear
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/12 00:15, Sam Smith wrote:
> yes, impersonation of the UID [Werner Koch (dist sig)] is what I'm trying to
> guard against.
>
> My efforts to verify the fingerprint are the best way to do this, correct?
>
>
>
>
>> Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 21
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/12 13:54, Sam Smith wrote:
> Can someone please verify that I have the legit public key to verify GnuPG
> with? I checked
> the website but the Fingerprint is not given anywhere.
>
> I got this Fingerprint for the Public Key I downloaded
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/05/12 23:01, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 08:07:54PM +0100, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> Openpgp/enigmail does not support gpg2 unless one has installed gpg
>> 1.4.11 - but I no longer trust Openpgp/enigmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/05/12 21:47, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 5/25/12 1:47 PM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> For example opensuse - all versions tested:
>
>> (1) When you open the address book in TB select an address right
>> mouse click you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/05/12 14:03, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:55:59PM +0100, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> - From tests carried out - Mandrava Linux was ok. I suspect that other Linux
>> distros have no
>> real problems - ju
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/05/12 19:48, Werner Koch wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> your mails are hard to read because you do not trim the quotes and use
> lines of 90 characters or longer. Please don't use more than about 72.
> One hint anyway:
>
> GNOME has a thing called gno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/05/12 13:55, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:39:04PM +0100, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>
>> I ran the debugging programme with Openpgp debugging options to
>> console and I got the message that with gpg2 ins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/05/12 15:15, Mustrum wrote:
> Http://xkcd.com/538
>
> :-)
>
>
> ___
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>
Well is a wrench better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/05/12 20:28, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 5/23/12 3:07 PM, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> Now I have 3 Linux Laptops. I started testing Linux distros with gpg2
>> - enigmail with Thunderbird - all 100 per cent Openpgp failed to
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/05/12 18:39, Steve wrote:
> Hey David et all,
>
> first: GPGTools Installer does indeed contain Enigmail and allows
> installation. Not sure if it has the latest version since Mozilla's crazy
> versioning means lots of maintenance and we could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/05/12 17:34, michael crane wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 5:18 pm, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> I have a draft version of nine frequently asked questions ready for
>> community review:
>>
>> http://keyservers.org/gnupgfaq.xhtml
>
> for me t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/05/12 16:54, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:35, mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com said:
>> On 23.05.2012 12:56, Steve wrote:
>>> I think we had the PGP/MIME vs inline discussion already.
>>
>> I am using PGP/MIME in this email. Can you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/05/12 16:38, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> On 23.05.2012 16:24, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> On 5/23/12 2:50 AM, Steve wrote:
>>> I absolutely agree. At GPGTools we thought about an automatic
>>> testing system. Checking if the mail was encrypted and /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- Original Message
Subject: The UK's cruelest cut
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 07:51:49 -0400
From: Emma Ruby-Sachs - Avaaz.org
To: da...@gbenet.com
Dear friends across the UK,
Each year, tens of thousands of girls in the U
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/05/12 19:46, Kevin Kammer wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 08:26:14PM +0200 Also sprach Hauke Laging:
>> Given the frequency of this discussion and the amount of effort takes by the
>> participants: Wouldn't it make sense to make this a FAQ entr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/05/12 19:40, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 5/22/12 2:26 PM, Hauke Laging wrote:
>> Given the frequency of this discussion and the amount of effort takes by the
>> participants: Wouldn't it make sense to make this a FAQ entry?
>
> I think so, yes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/05/12 19:09, Peter Lebbing wrote:
Oh all right :) Ha! Ha!
David - no offence meant btw :) just so funny :)
- --
“See the sanity of the man! No gods, no angels, no demons, no body. Nothing of
the
kind.Stern, sane,every brain-cell perfect a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/05/12 18:23, Hubert Kario wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 of May 2012 13:34:20 da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 22/05/12 09:58, tim.kac...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I think it sh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/05/12 13:12, Jerry wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 04:58:48 -0400 tim.kac...@gmail.com articulated:
>
> {snip}
>
>
>
> Interesting! I once worked for a secret government agency. We had a working
> theory that
> anyone using encryption for other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/05/12 09:58, tim.kac...@gmail.com wrote:
> I think it should be okay to dredge up this topic ever couple years. From
> what I am reading, links below, I do not feel comfortable with the key
> length and algorithmic security offered by GPG's d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 16/05/12 08:01, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:33:12 +0100 "da...@gbenet.com"
> wrote:
>
> Hello da...@gbenet.com,
>
>> How odd is that? I rechecked the link and it still works
>
> I can confirm MFPA&#x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 15/05/12 22:43, MFPA wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Tuesday 15 May 2012 at 9:21:13 PM, in
> , da...@gbenet.com wrote:
>
>
>> It works now :)
>
> Not from here - I just visited http://xfmail.slappy.org/ and was
> s
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
