quot;disable-ccid" to scdaemon.conf and gpg now works
even though pcscd is running. Thanks for the help.
Dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ead.so.0 but the failing one is linked against libnpth.so.0, but that
seems to have to do with locking which I wouldn't expect to make difference
with a simple local test.
I was hoping to bisect to the problem except that the 2.3 and 2.4 branches fail
at their .0 vers
ead.so.0 but the failing one is linked against libnpth.so.0, but that
seems to have to do with locking which I wouldn't expect to make difference
with a simple local test.
I was hoping to bisect to the problem except that the 2.3 and 2.4 branches fail
at their .0 vers
> On Feb 15, 2022, at 2:45 PM, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
>
>
>> On 15 Feb 2022, at 21:46, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) via Gnupg-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> Since the debacle a few years ago with the SKS keyserver denial-of-service
>> attack, the keyservers
keyring is not helpful either, unless we "faked it"
by attempting to encrypt a message to that address, then discarded it.
Is there another way forward? The normal things for auto-key-locate don't
seem to help here. I'm open to ideas.
-Dan
(PS: on gnupg.org, the documentation fo
I was on Amazon Smile today and noticed quite a few FOSS projects were
available to select as the source of my amazon shopping proceeds.
Also thought that registering gnupg.org, gpg4win.org and g10code.com
in the Brave Rewards program might be an interesting way to allow
GnuPG to accept small
Thanks, I checked the following per your advice
1. Are any of the certs ECC?
No, they all appear to be RSA keys.
2. Has the org root cert been imported?
I believe so, yes. There are three certs in the chain. My s/MIME
cert, it's parent, and its "grandparent". Both gpgsm and the Windows
So I work for a large company that has their own internal CA and
maintains their own set of S/MIME certificates. We periodically have
to re-enroll in S/MIME and import the certificate into Microsoft
Outlook to have encrypt / sign functionality. This time when I
enrolled for my recent
he fewest users, but even just matching 14.04's
would make sense to a lot of people.
Also, gnupg.org should add a web page like
https://www.gnupg.org/release-end-of-life
that lays out the EOL for all released versions;
the only one with a clear EOL is 2.0.x, and that's a bit buried in
text on the
, by 3 to 6 months)?
That would avoid poking classic users in the eye too hard,
and give time for them to get used to the idea.
- Dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
unticking it.)
- Dan
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:27 AM, Robert J. Hansen <r...@sixdemonbag.org> wrote:
> [taps the mike]
>
> Hi. I maintain the official GnuPG FAQ. So let me start off by
> answering a question that is certainly about to be asked a lot: "Should
> we be wo
rce tool which is in repositories for four redhat-ish distros and
two debian-ish distros; on Ubuntu, I was able to walk down the
path of using it a bit, looks a bit rusty, but see
https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide
So it doesn't seem to be RHEL-only. (They have a v
make passing audits a lot easier
than building the latest gnupg release yourself...
and is less likely to break things.
- Dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
with, but
it was only temporary as we don't require an interactive passphrase
following key creation.
On 1 February 2018 at 05:00, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net>
wrote:
> On Mon 2018-01-29 15:44:56 +1300, Dan Horne wrote:
> > Has someone got a workaround? I need to be able to
Hi
I'm using GnuPG 2.0.29 on Solaris. This specific version is being used
because it's the only one we could get installed and working.
I'm trying to generate keys from a user I have su'd to, but I get the
following error:
gpg-agent[23024]: command get_passphrase failed: Permission denied
gpg:
Hi
I'm using GnuPG 2.0.29 on Solaris. This specific version is being used
because it's the only one we could get installed and working.
I'm trying to generate keys from a user I have su'd to, but I get the
following error:
gpg-agent[23024]: command get_passphrase failed: Permission denied
gpg:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 4:08 PM, Todd Zullinger <t...@pobox.com> wrote:
> I think that's https://dev.gnupg.org/T2290
Thanks.
Say, anyone know how to get bug tracker problems resolved?
Somehow my email address there lacks a dot before .com,
so I can't get confirmation emai
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Dan Kegel <d...@kegel.com> wrote:
>> The keys referred to via signed-by are the only acceptable keys for the
>> associated apt repo.
>>
>> does that make sense?
>
> That'd be great if it worked. Since it's hard to explain wha
The keys referred to via signed-by are the only acceptable keys for the
> associated apt repo.
>
> does that make sense?
That'd be great if it worked. Since it's hard to explain what's broken
without a simple script showing exactly what I'm doing, let's just
hold that thought until I post one.
- Dan
_
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Dan Kegel <d...@kegel.com> wrote:
> Here's the bit where it explodes,
>
> + sudo GNUPGHOME=/tmp/obs_localbuild_gpghome_dank.tmp
> APT_CONFIG=/home/dank/src/obs/foo.tmp/etc/apt.conf apt-get -q -q
> update
> inside VerifyGetSigners
> Prepa
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 8:31 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
<d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> On Tue 2018-01-16 20:10:38 -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > When I try to use gpg to manipulate secure apt repositories in the
> > real world, my head explodes.
>
> hi there! what kind of
nd on for a couple years.
- Dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
that even the latest apt
from debian does not support version 2's keybox format, so I had
to drop back to gpg version 1 anyway.
Is version 1 going to remain available, I hope? Version 2 simply
seems a poor fit for scripting.
Thanks,
Dan
___
Gnupg-users
em did it solve?
I'm curious, too.
It sure makes scripting hard.
- Dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Thanks. I exported my keys to ~/.gnupg/trustedkeys.gpg. I tried gpgv2 but
got the following
bash-3.2$ gpgv2 declaration.pgp
gpgv: verify signatures failed: Unexpected error
Adding --verbose did not affect this (Note this is a OpenCSW install)
However, if I simply decrypt the file I get
ey signed the data, usually by long key
> ID IIRC. You have to make sure the key that signed the data is the key that
> you expect, basically. If you need something more in-depth, there are many
> more qualified individuals to assist on the list.
>
> On October 26, 2017
Thanks - I get the line saying "good signature" i n my message, but are you
saying that I have to grep the output for the message and the email address
of the encryptor?
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Hi all
maybe I'm missing something, but how do I verify not only that an encrypted
file is signed, but that it is signed by the party I expect to have signed
it? In other words, if two parties can supply a file with the same name I
want to make sure that when I think I'm dealing with a file from
has my ugly code, and an automated test
that sometimes fails on slow systems like raspberry pi because of my
poor transparent wrapper around the gpg agent.
It is somewhat obscured by site-specific stuff (e.g. it uses gpg via apt).
I could try to do a clean demo without apt
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
<d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> GnuPG upstream developers tend to recommend the use of GPGME for system
> integration projects that require a stable interface.
dpkg does that, but it doesn't help people trying to automate dpk
bin58004 Jul 11 2011
/opt/csw/bin/pinentry-curses
It still doesn't work
After a bit more Googling, I tried adding the following to my gpg.conf
file, but it caused a syntax error:
pinentry-program /opt/csw/bin/pinentry-curses
Any advice appreciated
Thanks
Dan
se, which
made things a bit harder.
- Dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Did you see my walkthrough of all the problems I ran into while
getting gpg to not prompt?
https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2017-April/058158.html
https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2017-April/058162.html
That's for Linux, but it might still have a trick you're missing.
rint
_EOF_
chmod +x test-script.sh
rm -rf /tmp/gpgtest-*
export GNUPGHOME=$(mktemp -d /tmp/gpgtest-XXX.tmp)
echo "allow-loopback-pinentry" > $GNUPGHOME/gpg-agent.conf
gpg-agent --daemon ./test-script.sh
rm -rf $GNUPGHOME
-- snip --
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Dan Kegel <d..
tl;dr: anyone know what's up with --debug-quick-random? Also, handy
script for unattended key generation across many versions of gpg.
Hi all. This topic has been beaten to death on many forums and in many
bug reports, but here's a user report from the field that sums up what
works. It's mostly
On 29.08.15 19:13, Dan Bryant wrote:
OK, this worked in getting the binaries extracted and by setting PATH
and DYNLD_LIBRARY_PATH I can get the bins to load and dump version
information... SUCCESS...
Now my biggest problem is getting the agent and pinentry (I assume) to
talk to gpg.
I was hoping I
, libexecdir with gpgconf
(gpgconf.conf) but I can't seem to figure out how to convice gpg to
look in nonstandard paths for binaries and libraries. Seems to be
ignoring PATH environment.
Suggestions?
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Patrick Brunschwig
patr...@enigmail.net wrote:
On 26.08.15 17:16, Dan
I have a monitored OS X laptop that I would like to put GNU Privacy
Guard (gpg) on. Of course I can't because I don't have Admin rights,
but I was hoping there is a way to install it in user space through a
virtual environment or chroot, or some other wizardry, or by exacting
the package files.
, Dan Bryant dkbry...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a monitored OS X laptop that I would like to put GNU Privacy
Guard (gpg) on. Of course I can't because I don't have Admin rights,
but I was hoping there is a way to install it in user space through a
virtual environment or chroot, or some other wizardry
*SOLVED*
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Dan Bryant dkbry...@gmail.com wrote:
OK... I'm apparently suffering from a bad gpgsm setup. According to
the 2011 post
(https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2011-March/025989.html)
the following command, should just work:
gpgsm --gen
OK... I'm apparently suffering from a bad gpgsm setup. According to
the 2011 post
(https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2011-March/025989.html)
the following command, should just work:
gpgsm --gen-key | gpgsm --import
Not for me... I get
gpgsm: problem looking for existing
TL;DR: gpgsm import fails with no issuer found in certificate
I'm trying to generate a key-pair for GnuPG S/MINE strictly for
instructional reasons. I'll concede that I'm using a weak CA, but I'm
trying to image how the CA maintainers do this task as well. So, for my
instruction, I'm trying to
(GnuPG) 2.1.3
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Dan Bryant dkbry...@gmail.com wrote:
TL;DR: gpgsm import fails with no issuer found in certificate
I'm trying to generate a key-pair for GnuPG S/MINE strictly for
instructional reasons. I'll concede that I'm using a weak CA, but I'm
trying to image
, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Dan Bryant dkbry...@gmail.com wrote:
OK... I found some very old posts about this... don't know how much still
holds.
-- https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2011-June/026126.html
This guide says:
1. Convert rootCA.pem to rootCA.der
2. Place rootCA.der
' paymasters, and on and on. That these are possible
is worrisome; that they are widely built into services which promise
convenience is the Pied Piper institutionalized. As I wrote
elsewhere(*), we are becoming a society of informants -- I have
nowhere to hide from you.
--dan
(*)
We Are All
, does not the very concept of private
information fade, per se? I believe it does.
We Are All Intelligence Officers Now
http://geer.tinho.net/geer.rsa.28ii14.txt
--dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman
the gnupg list, we are likely now in a rat hole, but if
we are not yet there, then let me ask a question: Many's the member
of this list who posts under a pseudonym. Is pseudonymous posting
a privacy-preserving tactic or something else?
--dan
___
Gnupg
on a mobile phone.
Small sample,...
--dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
would anyone ever render HTML e-mail at all?
Apologies,
--dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
this pinentry, and could exit cleanly.
Thoughts are welcome.
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---
___
Gnupg-users
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014, Hauke Laging wrote:
Am Fr 03.01.2014, 01:14:22 schrieb Dan Mahoney, System Admin:
It basically works perfectly with gpg1, where I can get an inline
prompt for a password, but gpg2 falls short where it tries to set up
some kind of a unix-socket connection to a pinentry
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014, Hauke Laging wrote:
Am Fr 03.01.2014, 01:14:22 schrieb Dan Mahoney, System Admin:
It basically works perfectly with gpg1, where I can get an inline
prompt for a password, but gpg2 falls short where it tries to set up
some kind of a unix-socket connection to a pinentry
,
Degrees of Separation in Social Networks, 2011
http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/SOCS/SOCS11/paper/view/4031
Allowed three hops is closer to a grand mal seizure than a twitch.
For a sideline, look up percolation theory.
--dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
of the
compiler.
--dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
expensive, it's my guess that the CPU
vendor surely must just unwittingly ship the
CPUs that happen to have obscurely bad TRNGs.
--dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
.
When 1.4 support ends, expect an EOL date to be announced far in advance
and a lot of help given to people who need to migrate to 2.0.
See above.
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site: http://www.gushi.org
which characteristic, if I need to say it,
means that security, a variant of the halting problem,
is formally undecideable.
--dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
for the
list having a reply-to header.
The above applies to all mailing lists, including here.
I can cope; this is just my ask.
Please and thank you,
--dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
in my opinion, why do we have such broken
infrastructure that it cannot support a simple lookup like this?
-Dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
elsewhere?
Read section 4.2 of RFC-4880. The length header encoding is a bit
complicate.
The pgpdump source code may be a bit more easy to grasp if you just
want to understand the file format.
http://www.mew.org/~kazu/proj/pgpdump/en/
-Dan
___
Gnupg
.
You got that right, Brother.
To be more pointed, how many folks on this list carry a cell phone?
--dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
the
machine. The only operation it will ever be used in is lsigning
various other public keys.
-Dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
transfer via the clipboard easy and relatively safe (clearing it
after 10 seconds), so that doesn't sound like the safety of no
passphrase at all.
-Dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
values are not accepted, nor seconds,
minutes, or hours.
-Dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, David Shaw ds...@jabberwocky.com wrote:
On Jul 28, 2011, at 4:49 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
I wanted to test behavior of an application with an expired signature,
but using `--ask-sig-expire` don't seem to be granular enough. The
minimum I can specify is either 1
and discovering that
doesn't seem to be a workable option at this point.
-Dan
[1] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/sage-mathematics/
[2] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2011-June/01.html
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
for some contexts
individually.
-- Function: gpgme_error_t gpgme_set_engine_info
Yes, we are doing this already and are setting the home directory to
/etc/pacman.d/gnupg/.
-Dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org
with --lock-never in a
read-only mode?
Any feedback is welcome, thanks in advance!
-Dan
$ sudo gpg --homedir /etc/pacman.d/gnupg --verify
/home/makepkg/packages/libmysqlclient-5.5.12-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz.sig
gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir `/etc/pacman.d/gnupg'
gpg: Signature made Tue 17 May
mean). As it happens, everyone I call
assumes it is me as I am the only one who chooses that.
--dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
a hundred years ago, but also extr
emely unrealistic.
The 23andme.com folks claim that their genetic screening
thing is liberating people by connecting them to relatives
that they did not know they had.
I, for one, have a lot of relatives that I don't want to know.
--dan
This message
I don't think anyone was suggesting that adroit use of
PGP/GPG is a talisman against those who wield lead pipes
and want what they want. Not that there isn't a movie
script in that line of thought...
--dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users
is an actual fact of nature, then I'll choose
more privacy and less security as the Internet-of-Things approaches.
--dan
A conservative is a socialist who worships order.
A liberal is a socialist who worships safety.
-- Victor Milan', 1999
definition of privacy evolves, but as of now is this:
Privacy is the effective capacity to misrepresent oneself.
and, semi-orthogonally,
Security is the absence of unmitigatable surprise.
YMMV,
--dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users
|
| 2. Randomly send messages that can't be decrypted to random recipients
|to obscure matters. The adversary would have to cope with the fact
|that I have stuff to hide. :)
|
Ah. Spam as a covert channel. Tell me that this isn't already done?
--dan
If one is a purist, then one wants signencryptsign
See http://world.std.com/~dtd/#sign_encrypt
--dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
to correct or otherwise
comment on the above, feel free.
Regards,
Dan
[1]http://www.spywarewarrior.com/uiuc/ss/sec-key/sec-key.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkzAbOsACgkQiSdIUo
appear to be quite scarce, I come to
you, O list. If anyone can clarify or elaborate on the security
considerations of CAST-128, it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Dan
[1]http://www.springerlink.com/content/978-3-642-04158-7/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32
On 13/10/2010 4:02 PM, MFPA wrote:
The user can type their password once per session into a text file and
paste it every time it is requested. This reduces the annoyance factor
and does not train the user to constantly re-type the passphrase.
I use a program called KeePass to keep track of my
Hi everyone,
Almost-but-not-quite my first post to this list. I am very interested
in encryption technologies, and PGP in particular. Of course, this is
only a hobby and I don't have any trade secrets or international
intrigues to protect, so that leaves me at a bit of a disadvantage when
it
do this, but
--search does not.
Is there a way to make that work?
--
Ca. Tas. Tro. Phy.
-John Smedley, March 28th 1998, 3AM
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site: http://www.gushi.org
.)
Is there some reasonable way that gpg can detect that it has a controlling
termainal (or even, a config file option) and just ask me for my
passphrase on stdin?
I am my sysadmin. I trust me :)
-Dan
--
Let me tell you something about regrowing your dead wife Lucy, Harry.
It's probably illegal
question is: Is it possible to do in such a way that keys would be
backward-compatible?
(I have no idea about the internal format of a PGP key, to me it's just
bricktext...at least right now).
-Dan
--
If you aren't going to try something, then we might as well just be
friends.
We can't have
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010, David Shaw wrote:
On Jun 27, 2010, at 3:58 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
All,
How difficult would it be to propose some kind of extension flag to the PGP key format
that in essence says don't publish me to a keyserver. Note that I'm asking
from a technical point
autodiscovery.)
-Dan
--
Hitler, Satan, those Hanson kids, anything. Just not the curious
anteater.
-Peter Scolari, as Wayne Szalinki in Honey, I Shrunk The Kids--The
Series
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site
Hey all,
Is there an easy syntax to chain multiple keyservers for searching? In
theory it shouldn't be necessary, but there are distinct keyserver
networks out there that don't share, as well as private hkp keyservers
which might need to be searched first.
-Dan
--
SOY BOMB!
-The Chest
- the latter may be useful to specify
servers you know don't synchronise reliably, when posting revocations.
Considering I'm running on a FreeBSD system, however...
-Dan
--
It would be bad.
-Egon Spengler, Ghostbusters
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 6/22/10 10:09 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Is this very old and it's now supported? Or is it still not in for some
other reason (either oversight, legal, or other).
By modern standards, IDEA is not considered a promising cipher
. With a very short signature
time, and pollute them so they look like this:
uid Dan Mahoney dmaho...@isc.org
sig 3E919EC51 2008-11-22 Dan Mahoney dmahoney@
sig 3E8048D08 2009-10-15 Peter Losher Peter_Losher@
sig 68D482E2 2009-08-31 Guy Sisalli gsisalli@
sig
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, David Shaw wrote:
On Jun 22, 2010, at 11:02 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
It seems there's two interesting problems which inter-relate.
The first is PGP corporation's global directory, which seems to
operate orthogonally from every other keyserver I've seen
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, David Shaw wrote:
On Jun 22, 2010, at 11:02 PM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
It seems there's two interesting problems which inter-relate.
The first is PGP corporation's global directory, which seems to operate
.
-Dan
--
Don't be so depressed dear.
I have no endorphins, what am I supposed to do?
-DM and SK, February 10th, 1999
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site: http://www.gushi.org
: checking for C compiler default output file name
It seems, I need to install C compiler by installing SPROcc 9(unbundled
SPARCworks Professional C compiler)
Please advise on this.
Thanks,
Raj
You could just install gcc.
-Dan
--
Blargy Frap!
-mtreal, efnet #macintosh channel, 8.10.98, Approx 3AM
By Jeremy Kirk, IDG News Service
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/195217/symantec_buys_encryption_specialist_pgp_for_300m.html
Symantec will acquire encryption specialist PGP and endpoint security
vendor GuardianEdge Technologies for US$300 million and $70 million
respectively, the
:
Researchers who had physical enough access to be able to rewire the
private-key-holder's system's power supply were able to compromise that
system.
If you're at that point, I don't think key length is your problem.
-Dan Mahoney
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi
. It wouldn't be totally unsurprising to me
if a series of redirects caused problems.
So, if you're interested in comparing apples to apples, for curiosity I
just uploaded your pubkey (sean.pubkey.txt) to the same url as
danm.pubkey.txt).
See if that fixes it, at least for testing.
-Dan
surgery a few years ago, and
documented it in the process, along with some other notes on short
circuiting the whole thing.
Have a look at www.gushi.org/willworks.txt
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site: http
location inder win32, if you don't mind me asking?
-Dan
--
You recreate the stars in the sky with cows?
-Furrball, March 7 2005, on Katamari Damacy
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site: http://www.gushi.org
There are quite a few installations of the above at
the 100,000 seats level (enterprise deployment).
--dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
All,
I've written a pretty conclusive howto on how to publish keys in DNS,
including detailing the advantages and disadvantages of each method, with
full examples, details on testing, and real-world output.
I've also re-implemented make
the
flag and do whatever they like.
Is that analagous to the flag in older versions of PGP that would cause a
message to be displayed in a non-printable/non-copyable format?
-Dan
--
I want to see how you see.
-SK, 6/2/99, 4:30 AM
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
