Re: comments on uid

2012-03-18 Thread freejack
Well, the UID is what other people sign. Suppose by a wonderful coincidence my name is Barack Obama. To prevent confusion, I create this UID Barack Obama (NOT the US president) bar...@is-my.name People sign this. They have seen my birth certificate... erm... I mean passport :)

Re: comments on uid

2012-03-18 Thread freejack
I should note that many people actually *don't* check if the e-mail address belongs to the person whose UID they sign. If this were as simple to prove as it is to prove you have a certain name by showing a passport or something, it might be checked more often. That doesn't sound right. If you

Re: comments on uid

2012-03-16 Thread freejack
The OP was maybe referring to the comment in UIDs of the form Name (Comment) email address. Right that's what I meant. The comment can only be added when creating the UID. If you wish to add, remove or edit you can create a new UID and set it as primary. If the key has not been shared,

comments on uid

2012-03-15 Thread freejack
Is it possible to add or edit comments on a uid? I didn't see any obvious option in the help for edit. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Prosecution based on memory forensics

2011-01-13 Thread freejack
When you close a laptop, Windows (or Mac OS X, or Linux, or what-have-you) takes a snapshot of memory contents and writes it to disk. This can be a really big problem, since encryption keys, passphrases, and so forth are written out in the process. For instance, if you have gpg-agent set up

Re: --digest-algo ignored on gnupg-1.4.9?

2011-01-06 Thread freejack
Robert J. Hansen said something like this: On 1/5/2011 4:00 PM, freej...@is-not-my.name wrote: Then something is very odd. Here's my output, only I used IDEA instead of 3DES for my test: You might want to reconsider using IDEA: although it was the bee's knees for the early 1990s, the

Re: --digest-algo ignored on gnupg-1.4.9?

2011-01-06 Thread freejack
Hi David, --digest-algo specifies the digest for making signatures. It is not related to symmetric-only (-c) encryption, where the digest is used as part of the S2K to mangle your passphrase into a symmetric key. You want the --s2k-digest-algo option. As the documentation says:

--digest-algo ignored on gnupg-1.4.9?

2011-01-05 Thread freejack
Hi, it appears --digest-algo is ignored for symmetric encryption using gpg 1.4.9. I was able to verify --cipher-algo does work but for some reason no matter what I specify for --digest-algo I always get RIPEMD160 as the hash according to --list-packets and pgpdump. It's definitely looking at what

Re: --digest-algo ignored on gnupg-1.4.9?

2011-01-05 Thread freejack
On 01/05/2011 01:37 PM, freej...@is-not-my.name wrote: Hi, it appears --digest-algo is ignored for symmetric encryption using gpg 1.4.9. Using --digest-algo is pretty dangerous. It's easy to create messages your recipients can't parse. --personal-digest-preferences is what you want to

Re: --digest-algo ignored on gnupg-1.4.9?

2011-01-05 Thread freejack
If you have a 1024 bit dsa key this is likely the cause. To help you more we'd need to know what kind of key you have, and what you're setting for disgest-algo. Also, Robert's reply was correct too. :) Hello Doug! *Symmetric* encryption! hth, Maybe next time ;-)

Re: How to process a big file of encrypted mails?

2010-12-30 Thread freejack
Right then. Thanks Robert and Doug. Happy New Years to all! Cheers! ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

How to process a big file of encrypted mails?

2010-12-29 Thread freejack
Hi, Occasionally I get a big file of encrypted emails with mail headers stripped out. All thats in the file is the begin and end PGP marks and all the encrypted armored text in between. Some are encrypted to me, others to my coworkers. Sometimes if I do gpg filename it finds all my mails and asks

Re: How to process a big file of encrypted mails?

2010-12-29 Thread freejack
Robert J. Hansen r...@sixdemonbag.org wrote: On 12/29/2010 12:10 PM, freej...@is-not-my.name wrote: Someone said we should write a script to parse all the messages into individual files and then do gpg on each one and that's what i'll do if there isn't a way to get gpg to scan the whole