On 1/31/2012 6:18 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
> Okay, the harshness of language here has baited me to reply:
First, thank you for keeping your response civil. I appreciate it a lot.
> There's a simple reason people do this, and it's because it is a
> common choice for large lists, including the Lin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 at 9:48:03 PM, in
,
Richard wrote:
> I've done this before (on this list), but only because
> I had the impression "almost everyone else here" did
> it, so I just wanted to go with what I assumed to be
> expected. I
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Jerry wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:26:07 -0500
> Christopher J. Walters articulated:
>
>> It was my understanding that this bug had been fixed in Thunderbird,
>> but I may be mistaken. I know that in a GNU/Linux user mailing list
>> I have long been signed up
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 06:35, Jerry wrote:
> I have encounter two individuals, not on this list, who also think it
> is cute to mail a response directly to the OP and then CC the list.
> Honestly, some people are alive only because it seems cruel to kill a
> retard.
I've done this before (on this
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:26:07 -0500
Christopher J. Walters articulated:
> It was my understanding that this bug had been fixed in Thunderbird,
> but I may be mistaken. I know that in a GNU/Linux user mailing list
> I have long been signed up for, I will occasionally receive CC's not
> for replies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 1/30/2012 06:09 PM, John Clizbe wrote:
> I always get a chuckle every time I read someone writing that inline signing
> is
> somehow "deprecated." Strangely enough, the only place I can find the
> origination of such an idea is in the PGP/MIME R
