Faramir wrote:
Andrew Berg escribió:
Faramir wrote:
It happens too with pop3... I hate that "feature"... well, it (gmail)
had to have some disadvantage...
Not in my experience. That's why I use POP3 instead of IMAP.
Do you mean you can see the messages you send to the list? Then I have
t
Faramir wrote:
> Do you mean you can see the messages you send to the list? Then I have
> to check my config... I am using pop3 too.
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Bottom of the page, enter email address and click 'Unsubscribe or edit options'.
Enter list password and 'log
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Andrew Berg escribió:
> Faramir wrote:
>> It happens too with pop3... I hate that "feature"... well, it (gmail)
>> had to have some disadvantage...
>
> Not in my experience. That's why I use POP3 instead of IMAP.
Do you mean you can see the mes
Faramir wrote:
It happens too with pop3... I hate that "feature"... well, it (gmail)
had to have some disadvantage...
Not in my experience. That's why I use POP3 instead of IMAP.
--
Key ID: 0xF88E034060A78FCB
Fingerprint: 4A84 CAE2 A0D3 2AEB 71F6 07FD F88E 0340 60A7 8FCB
Windows NT 6.0.6001.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alexander W. Janssen escribió:
>> It also wanted to have the same messages in the Inbox folder as well
>> as the All Mail folder. How silly.
>
> Yeah, Google makes a difference between Inbox and "All Mail". They have
> this enormous stupid claim:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alexander W. Janssen escribió:
> Andrew Berg wrote:
>> On a side note, is there any reason I didn't see the last message I sent
>> to the list?
>
> You're using Gmail... And probably IMAP? Common problem. Google calls it
> a "feature". You need to o
On 18 July 08, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> John B wrote:
> > That's what the subject line is for. After that, it should be all
> > reading as if one is reading a book and seeing things in the logical
> > order and way people were taught to read and respond.
>
> I don't know about you, but when I for
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 12:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Does anyone know of a way to get M$ LookOut to support PGP/MIME properly
> (in particular, mails with attachments)?
GpgOL (from gpg4win) does that. The version in 1.1.3 is a bit limited
and probably has a couple of bugs. The beta version in 1
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 04:19:47AM +0200, Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
> John B wrote:
> > Throw it away and get one that does things correctly?
>
> Unfortunately many people are stuck with inconvenient solution where
> they have no influence in getting something better.
>
> Ha. Me and my Outloo
John B wrote:
> That's what the subject line is for. After that, it should be all
> reading as if one is reading a book and seeing things in the logical
> order and way people were taught to read and respond.
I don't know about you, but when I forward an academic paper on to a
colleague, I write a
On 18 July 08, Andrew Berg wrote:
> John B wrote:
> > On 17 July 08, John Clizbe wrote:
> >> A4: Yes, *only* when introducing the text of a forwarded message
> >> Q4: Is it ever OK to top post?
> >
> > A: Wrong, it's *never* correct, it leads only to someone, *again*,
> > trying to argue that so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John B wrote:
> Throw it away and get one that does things correctly?
Unfortunately many people are stuck with inconvenient solution where
they have no influence in getting something better.
Ha. Me and my Outlook at work. Bargh.
Alex.
-BEGIN
Andrew Berg wrote:
> Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
>> Andrew Berg wrote:
>>> On a side note, is there any reason I didn't see the last message
>>> I sent to the list?
>>
>> You're using Gmail... And probably IMAP? Common problem. Google
>> calls it a "feature". You need to open the "All Mail" fold
Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
Andrew Berg wrote:
On a side note, is there any reason I didn't see the last message I sent
to the list?
You're using Gmail... And probably IMAP? Common problem. Google calls it
a "feature". You need to open the "All Mail" folder instead of the inbox.
I'm using POP3
Andrew Berg wrote:
> On a side note, is there any reason I didn't see the last message I sent
> to the list?
You're using Gmail... And probably IMAP? Common problem. Google calls it
a "feature". You need to open the "All Mail" folder instead of the inbox.
Cheers,
Alex.
signature.asc
Descript
Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
Andrew Berg wrote:
James P. Howard, II wrote:
A minor vent: the problem now is the proliferation of mobile devices
which make it too difficult to not top post. Users, at this point,
are fooled into thinking this is the correct form due to the lack of a
practical al
John B wrote:
On 17 July 08, John Clizbe wrote:
A4: Yes, *only* when introducing the text of a forwarded message
Q4: Is it ever OK to top post?
A: Wrong, it's *never* correct, it leads only to someone, *again*, trying to
argue that somehow it's okay, and still discombobulates everything.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Berg wrote:
> James P. Howard, II wrote:
>> A minor vent: the problem now is the proliferation of mobile devices
>> which make it too difficult to not top post. Users, at this point,
>> are fooled into thinking this is the correct form due to
James P. Howard, II wrote:
A minor vent: the problem now is the proliferation of mobile devices
which make it too difficult to not top post. Users, at this point,
are fooled into thinking this is the correct form due to the lack of a
practical alternative.
I think top-posting is common historic
On 17 July 08, James P. Howard, II wrote:
> A minor vent: the problem now is the proliferation of mobile devices
> which make it too difficult to not top post. Users, at this point,
> are fooled into thinking this is the correct form due to the lack of a
> practical alternative.
>
> Sent from my
On 17 July 08, John Clizbe wrote:
> A4: Yes, *only* when introducing the text of a forwarded message
> Q4: Is it ever OK to top post?
A: Wrong, it's *never* correct, it leads only to someone, *again*, trying to
argue that somehow it's okay, and still discombobulates everything. If they
don't
A minor vent: the problem now is the proliferation of mobile devices
which make it too difficult to not top post. Users, at this point,
are fooled into thinking this is the correct form due to the lack of a
practical alternative.
Sent from my BlackBerry...
James
On 7/17/08, John Clizbe <[EMAI
A4: Yes, *only* when introducing the text of a forwarded message
Q4: Is it ever OK to top post?
Werner Koch wrote:
> A3: Please.
> Q3: Should I avoid top posting on this mailing list?
>
> A2: Because, by reversing the order of a conversation, it leaves the
> reader without much context, and m
A3: Please.
Q3: Should I avoid top posting on this mailing list?
A2: Because, by reversing the order of a conversation, it leaves the
reader without much context, and makes them read a message in an
unnatural order.
Q2: Why is top posting irritating?
A1: It is the practice of putting your
24 matches
Mail list logo
