Re: For Mac users: the oncoming Mac OS X 10.5 "Leopard"

2007-10-22 Thread R.A. Hettinga
At 2:26 PM -0500 10/22/07, Andrew Berg wrote: >However, we should should have a vote for recipes, >with the winning recipe being the one you'd use. Somebody break out the Bass-o-Matic '76's (no, not *that* Bass-o-Matic) rag-trade cousin, the fabulous Hat-o-Matic 2000 or H2K, to its friends... Not

Re: For Mac users: the oncoming Mac OS X 10.5 "Leopard"

2007-10-22 Thread Andrew Berg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Robert J. Hansen wrote: > I will eat my own hat if GnuPG has any problems whatsoever with > Leopard. From all that I know of Leopard, GnuPG will continue to > work just fine. > > I will be getting Leopard very soon after release. If there are >

Re: For Mac users: the oncoming Mac OS X 10.5 "Leopard"

2007-10-22 Thread Robert J. Hansen
Charly Avital wrote: > Thanks in advance for any information from any Mac user or Mac developer > that has already tested GnuPG, and gpg2, as well as Thunderbird+Enigmail > under the new operating system. I will eat my own hat if GnuPG has any problems whatsoever with Leopard. From all that I kno

For Mac users: the oncoming Mac OS X 10.5 "Leopard"

2007-10-22 Thread Charly Avital
Thanks in advance for any information from any Mac user or Mac developer that has already tested GnuPG, and gpg2, as well as Thunderbird+Enigmail under the new operating system. I have read that users of PGP (PGP Corporation) expect unpleasant surprises. Charly _