On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 10:30, tliko...@iki.fi said:
> The feature is not documented in 2.1.18. Is it documented in newer
> versions?
It is kind of an emergency option in case we accidently remove an option
;-)
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
# Please read: Daniel Ellsberg - The Doomsday Machine #
Werner Koch [2018-03-05 13:24:28+01] wrote:
> gpg searches for its configurarion file in this order (I use 1.4.23 as
> example):
>
> gpg.conf-1.4.23
> gpg.conf-1.4
> gpg.conf-1
> gpg.conf
That feature is not documented in 2.1.18 but it seems to work. (I tried
"gpg.conf-2.1".)
--
/// Te
Werner Koch [2018-03-06 09:53:01+01] wrote:
> Note that there is another compatibility feature which can be used to
> ignore errors due to new options. For example:
>
> ignore-invalid-option foo bar
> verbose
> foo
> This feature is available since 1.4.13 and 2.0.20 .
The feature is not docume
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 19:30, b...@adversary.org said:
> Good to know, but will a version of GPG always select the highest in a
> listor the closest number to its own version number if there's not an
> exact match?
No, the algorithm views the version as a string simply trims the
dot/dash delimted pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Monday 5 March 2018 at 6:30:16 PM, in
, Ben McGinnes
wrote:-
> So if we slightly modify that example and say we have
> these conf
> files:
> 1. gpg.conf-1.4.23
> 2. gpg.conf-1.4.20
> 3. gpg.conf-1.4
> 4. gpg.conf-1
> 5. gpg.conf
> No
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 01:24:28PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
>
> gpg searches for its configurarion file in this order (I use 1.4.23 as
> example):
>
> gpg.conf-1.4.23
> gpg.conf-1.4
> gpg.conf-1
> gpg.conf
>
> The first existing one is used. This allows to have separate
> configuration
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 10:41, ba...@basix.tech said:
> I don't think this error is because of that because error message says
> gpg.conf.
gpg searches for its configurarion file in this order (I use 1.4.23 as
example):
gpg.conf-1.4.23
gpg.conf-1.4
gpg.conf-1
gpg.conf
The first existing on
On 05/03/18 10:41, Basix wrote:
> I don't think this error is because of that because error message says
> gpg.conf.
The problem is that the log-file option is not supported by GnuPG 1.4;
it was introduced in some 2.x version.
GnuPG 1.4.22 will look for the following files in order:
~/.gnupg/gpg
On Sun, 04 Mar 2018 19:59 +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> Create a possible empty file
>
>~/.gnupg/gpg.conf-1
>
> this will then be used for the 1.4 version.
I don't think this error is because of that because error message says gpg.conf.
--
Public PGP Key: 0F92613C
On Sat, 3 Mar 2018 21:06, ba...@basix.tech said:
> I think Kleopatra or another GPG frontend misconfigured my gpg.conf. How do I
> fix it myself? My GnuPG version is 1.4.22.
Create a possible empty file
~/.gnupg/gpg.conf-1
this will then be used for the 1.4 version.
Shalom-Salam,
Wer
Hello, I'm a user of GPG and I got some problem.
Recently my machine showing this message when do something in GPG:
[sample@localhost ~]$ gpg
gpg: /home/sample/.gnupg/gpg.conf:5: invalid option
[sample@localhost ~]$ cat -n ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf
1
2 ###+++--- GPGConf ---+++###
3 utf
Hello, I'm a user of GPG and I got some problem.
Recently my machine showing this message when do something in GPG:
[sample@localhost ~]$ gpg
gpg: /home/sample/.gnupg/gpg.conf:5: invalid option
[sample@localhost ~]$ cat -n ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf
1
2 ###+++--- GPGConf ---+++###
3 utf
12 matches
Mail list logo