On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 12:45, rdohm...@gmail.com said:
> We all need to evaluate this and will come back to you
> In case there is a file or txt missing, this have to be corrected.
I have not checked the claim that GoldBug is distributed under a BSD
license. Regardless of what license you use you n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
If the licensing issues can be resolved GoldBug may be the only
chance we have of getting people to use encryption in any form.
I think it is time for attorneys to have their say.
Ergo, GoldBug should have done this a little more transparently
rathe
thanks for the your correction .
2013/7/27 Robert J. Hansen
> On 7/27/2013 9:32 AM, Randolph D. wrote:
> > what a nonsense, Qt is LGPL and so not GPL...
>
> So it is: the Qt license has changed since I last looked at it. Good
> for them! The OpenSSL/GPL conflict is real and has prevented softwa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Perhaps you should just forward the information in a friendly manner
to the legal departments of all the involved vendors :)
On 07/27/2013 07:00 AM, Randolph D. wrote:
> Does the friendly License Soldier speaks that OpenSSL is not
> useable with Q
On 7/27/2013 7:12 AM, Randolph D. wrote:
> Hi Peter, see the libgcrypt shown with license here:
> # e2e Encryption (PK over SSL: using libgcrypt with LGPLv2.1+ License).
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/goldbug/?source=navbar
> and I think further releases will show it of course with more
> consi
Does the friendly License Soldier speaks that OpenSSL is not useable with
Qt gui framework?
2013/7/27 Robert J. Hansen
>
> See, e.g., https://people.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html
>
>
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http
Hi Peter, see the libgcrypt shown with license here:
# e2e Encryption (PK over SSL: using libgcrypt with LGPLv2.1+ License).
https://sourceforge.net/projects/goldbug/?source=navbar
and I think further releases will show it of course with more consideration
of the used libs,
What would the world be
On 27/07/13 12:45, Randolph D. wrote:
> We all need to evaluate this and will come back to you
> In case there is a file or txt missing, this have to be corrected.
You're one of the devs of the project, or otherwise affiliated with it?
Peter.
--
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combinatio
On 7/27/2013 6:45 AM, Randolph D. wrote:
> learn to be patient, consider other opinons and dont be a Matador of
> a shitstorm. Help People, and dont drop them down.
I am helping people. I am helping innocent people by telling them that,
in my experience as a professional software engineer with m
Thanks for the Information, Robert.
We all need to evaluate this and will come back to you
In case there is a file or txt missing, this have to be corrected.
But personally I would give you the tip, as you said this is not the right
list to discuss this and you yourself are mostly posting about it,
Product: GoldBug Instant Messenger (http://goldbug.sf.net)
Version: 0.1.1567RC
Platform: Win32
GoldBug Instant Messenger distributes portions of libgcrypt as part of
its package, under the name "libspoton". However, it claims to be fully
BSD licensed, which means it has relicensed libgcrypt in vi
11 matches
Mail list logo
