On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 02:16:17PM -0500, Ryan Malayter wrote:
On 6/19/07, Henry Hertz Hobbit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
than it took me to tar it. It also takes me much less time to
encrypt the tarred file than it takes to do the final bzip2 of the
encrypted file.
Huh? Why would you try
In my view, gnupg already offers too much choice. There is no real
reason to have so many options. They should have given 2 to chose from -
a small and fast and a large and slow (both sort of balanced, too), say
a) DSA-1024 (SHA1) Elgamal-1024, cipher 3DES - fingerprint SHA1
and
b) DSA-3072
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 6/19/07, Henry Hertz Hobbit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
than it took me to tar it. It also takes me much less time to
encrypt the tarred file than it takes to do the final bzip2 of the
encrypted file.
Huh? Why would you try to use bzip2 AFTER encrypting?
Strongly-encrypted data is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Interoperability with PGP 8 matters too.
Signatures made with RSA 4096-keys (or shorter) and SHA256 can be
verified by users of PGP 8.
N.B. Not any other new hashes!
Please note the option: --pgp8
Snoken
At 05:14 2007-06-20, you wrote:
Janusz A.
Snoken wrote:
Hi,
Interoperability with PGP 8 matters too.
Signatures made with RSA 4096-keys (or shorter) and SHA256 can be
verified by users of PGP 8.
N.B. Not any other new hashes!
Please note the option: --pgp8
Snoken
What I was trying to do was bring a real world perspective to
this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
What I was trying to do was bring a real world perspective to
this question. Are you using PGP 8? Do you know anybody who
is using PGP 8?
Yes and yes.
I far prefer PGP 8.1 over PGP 9.0+, and I've heard comments from many
other users who say
Janusz A. Urbanowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 01:02:58PM -0500, Andrew Berg wrote:
Atom Smasher wrote:
gpg does support RSA-2048/SHA-256 (or even RSA-4096/SHA-512)
which is what i've been using for a while now. i'll sign
this email with RSA-2048/SHA-256 (my
