Re: RSA pub-sec pri key pair + ELG enc + RSA sign subkeys + EDDSA/ECDH subkeys -> e-mail familiar RSA/ELG key recipient

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Friday 10 June 2016 at 2:11:30 PM, in , Brian Minton wrote: > For signing, I like to put both key IDs (in my case, > ed25519 and DSA) in > my gnupg conf file, so signing automatically uses > both keys. I do that, and have had feedback from E

Re: RSA pub-sec pri key pair + ELG enc + RSA sign subkeys + EDDSA/ECDH subkeys -> e-mail familiar RSA/ELG key recipient

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Fulano Diego Perez < fulanope...@cryptolab.net> wrote: > > trade-off for larger signature for me worth it > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Ed25519 and DSA signatures are both small. The resulting ascii signature block with 2 keys is still small

Re: RSA pub-sec pri key pair + ELG enc + RSA sign subkeys + EDDSA/ECDH subkeys -> e-mail familiar RSA/ELG key recipient

> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016, 3:58 AM Fulano Diego Perez > <fulanope...@cryptolab.net> wrote: > > will gnupg 2.1.x automatically select the senders' older _non > expired_ RSA/ELG subkeys so the recipient can decrypt/verify > signed/encrypted email ? > > is the conver

Re: RSA pub-sec pri key pair + ELG enc + RSA sign subkeys + EDDSA/ECDH subkeys -> e-mail familiar RSA/ELG key recipient

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016, 3:58 AM Fulano Diego Perez mailto:fulanope...@cryptolab.net>> wrote: will gnupg 2.1.x automatically select the senders' older _non expired_ RSA/ELG subkeys so the recipient can decrypt/verify signed/encrypted email ? is the converse true for the sender for wh

RSA pub-sec pri key pair + ELG enc + RSA sign subkeys + EDDSA/ECDH subkeys -> e-mail familiar RSA/ELG key recipient

sender: RSA pub-sec pri key pair + ELG enc + RSA sign subkeys + EDDSA/ECDH subkeys recipient: RSA and/or ELG key recipient sender e-mails recipient sender has in addition to older _non expired_ RSA/ELG subkeys, newer EDDSA/ECDH enc/sign subkeys recipient has familiar RSA pri key and _may_ have