* Stefan Claas:
> It should be noted that a fixed-width font would not help in this case,
> because with my proposal we are talking about a line-length paramter.
Making lines shorter to fit a vertical smartphone display? Or wider for
horizontal displays? For whatever functional purpose? The key d
Ralph Seichter via Gnupg-users wrote:
> * Stefan Claas:
>
> > I am aware of fixed-with fonts, but modern messengers or social media
> > do not use them.
>
> I deliberately don't use "social" media, nor do I care about it. Also,
> if a modern messenger (whatever you may label as such) is not supp
Ralph Seichter via Gnupg-users wrote:
> * Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users:
>
> > The reason why I ask, I often see postings on social
> > media sites and the output there looks horrible, IMHO.
>
> Fixed-width fun should do the trick. Besides, the ASCII armor format is
> meant to facilitate transpor
* Stefan Claas:
> I am aware of fixed-with fonts, but modern messengers or social media
> do not use them.
I deliberately don't use "social" media, nor do I care about it. Also,
if a modern messenger (whatever you may label as such) is not supporting
fixed-width fonts, that's the messenger's faul
Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 13:34 -0500, vedaal via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2/26/2020 at 11:27 AM, "Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users"
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I like to make a proposal for future versions of GnuPG,
> > > > w
* Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users:
> The reason why I ask, I often see postings on social
> media sites and the output there looks horrible, IMHO.
Fixed-width fun should do the trick. Besides, the ASCII armor format is
meant to facilitate transporting key data in email, not to look pretty.
Personall
On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 13:34 -0500, vedaal via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
> On 2/26/2020 at 11:27 AM, "Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users"
> wrote:
>
> > I like to make a proposal for future versions of GnuPG,
> > where a user can change the line witdh of ASCII armor
> > output.
>
> =
>
> It would not
On 2/26/2020 at 2:03 PM, "Michał Górny" wrote:
>
>Why 'change it back'? Unless I'm mistaken, GPG shouldn't have any
>real
>problem with a different base64 width, as long as the overall
>layout is
>preserved. I've just did a quick test and GPG is entirely happy
>with
>the result after rewrapp
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 13:34 -0500, vedaal via Gnupg-users wrote:
> >
> > On 2/26/2020 at 11:27 AM, "Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users"
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I like to make a proposal for future versions of GnuPG,
> > > where a user can change the line witdh of ASCII armor
> > >
ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
>
>
> On 2/26/2020 at 11:27 AM, "Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users"
> wrote:
>
> >I like to make a proposal for future versions of GnuPG,
> >where a user can change the line witdh of ASCII armor
> >output.
>
> =
>
> It would not be compatible with older versions.
I
On 2/26/2020 at 11:27 AM, "Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users"
wrote:
>I like to make a proposal for future versions of GnuPG,
>where a user can change the line witdh of ASCII armor
>output.
=
It would not be compatible with older versions.
The simplest thing for you, (or any users who prefe
11 matches
Mail list logo