On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:34:06 -0300
Faramir Faramir articulated:
> Sven Radde escribió:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Mark H. Wood schrieb:
> >> I too would like to find some way to get the word
> >> out about what it is and why my correspondent might find it
> >> desirable.
> >
> > What about inline signatur
On Saturday 23 January 2010, Chris De Young wrote:
> Sven Radde wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Mark H. Wood schrieb:
> >> I too would like to find some way to get the word
> >> out about what it is and why my correspondent might find it
> >> desirable.
> >
> > What about inline signatures when emailing peo
On 01/21/10 05:48, MFPA wrote:
>> These seem to be fairly rare these days though - or maybe I just don't know
>> many people who use clients like this.
>
> Outlook Express has that limitation (unless it was fixed in a late
> version).
I just did a quick test using Thunderbird 3, enigmail 1, and P
Chris De Young wrote:
Personally, and this is just my opinion, I don't care for this approach (I have
considered it) for a couple of reasons. One, it may encourage use of inline
signatures in general...
Unsolicited attachments are considered inappropriate by many.
MacRober
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sven Radde escribió:
> Hi!
>
> Mark H. Wood schrieb:
>> I too would like to find some way to get the word
>> out about what it is and why my correspondent might find it desirable.
>
> What about inline signatures when emailing people that do not ye
Sven Radde wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Mark H. Wood schrieb:
>> I too would like to find some way to get the word
>> out about what it is and why my correspondent might find it desirable.
>
> What about inline signatures when emailing people that do not yet use
> OpenPGP?
Personally, and this is just my op
Hi!
Mark H. Wood schrieb:
> I too would like to find some way to get the word
> out about what it is and why my correspondent might find it desirable.
What about inline signatures when emailing people that do not yet use
OpenPGP?
Enigmail, for example, has per-recipient rules that are supposed t
Mark H. Wood wrote:
> Oh, yes. My tongue is nearly bitten through from suppressing the urge
> to respond, "what did you think an 'application/pgp-signature'
> attachment is?" I too would like to find some way to get the word
> out about what it is and why my correspondent might find it desirable.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:04:26AM -0500, Matthew Krotzer wrote:
> I've recieved enough replies of "can't open the attachment you sent"
> that made me stop signing all my emails. I'm looking for best policy to
> say "hey, see this gpg stuff? You should look into it so we assure some
> degree of pr
* Chris De Young [100120 15:47]:
> Matthew Krotzer wrote:
> > What is the best way to let people know you use gpg in an email signature?
>
> I usually just sign my messages and figure that's sufficient advertising. I'm
> sure that only a very small minority of my recipients bothers to validate t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Chris
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 at 8:43:20 PM, you wrote:
> Matthew Krotzer wrote:
>> What is the best way to let people know you use gpg in an email signature?
> I usually just sign my messages and figure that's sufficient advertising. I'm
Matthew Krotzer wrote:
> What is the best way to let people know you use gpg in an email signature?
I usually just sign my messages and figure that's sufficient advertising. I'm
sure that only a very small minority of my recipients bothers to validate the
disgnature, so advertising is actually on
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 1/19/10 11:46 PM, Matthew Krotzer wrote:
>> What is the best way to let people know you use gpg in an email
>> signature?
>
> Some email clients (Thunderbird+Enigmail, for instance) let you put a
> kind of note to other users hidden in the email headers. These things,
On 1/19/10 11:46 PM, Matthew Krotzer wrote:
> What is the best way to let people know you use gpg in an email
> signature?
Some email clients (Thunderbird+Enigmail, for instance) let you put a
kind of note to other users hidden in the email headers. These things,
called "kludges," are one of the
14 matches
Mail list logo
