Il 07/06/2018 02:01, Leo Gaspard via Gnupg-users ha scritto:
>> The only secure (even against decapping attacks) device I know of is a
>> very old parallel-port "key" a friend described me ~25y ago.
>> It was made of 3 silicon layers: the outer ones only contained interface
>> circuits and
On 06/06/2018 06:56 PM, NdK wrote:
> Il 06/06/2018 17:49, Tom Li via Gnuk-users ha scritto:
>
>> BTW, BasicCard and JavaCard seemed even more obscure and I cannot find
>> any public service of cracking.
> Because those are (at least should be) based on secure chips.
>
>> But it does not solve
On 06/06/2018 08:50 PM, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
> See https://www.aisec.fraunhofer.de/en/FirmwareProtection.html for
> some research on breaking STM32 readout protection published in
> January.
For what it's worth, STMicroelectronics claims that the attack described
in this paper "affects
Am 05.06.2018 um 02:37 schrieb NIIBE Yutaka:
> Hello,
>
> While learning Chinese language, I found this service (in Chinese):
>
> http://www.pcbcopy.com/2016/ic_1128/1928.html
>
> IIUC, It's a company in ShenZhen, which offers a service reading out
> from protected STM32F103, even if it
Relevant discussion is moved to [gnuk-users], but in case someone has
seen the first mail in [gnupg-users] but missed other mails, I've
reposted the mail, sorry for the double post.
Follow-up discussion should be sent to [gnuk-users].
-
> While learning Chinese language, I found this
> While learning Chinese language, I found this service (in Chinese):
>
> http://www.pcbcopy.com/2016/ic_1128/1928.html
>
> IIUC, It's a company in ShenZhen, which offers a service reading out
> from protected STM32F103, even if it uses anti-tamper feature with a
> battery.
>
> I was aware
Hello,
While learning Chinese language, I found this service (in Chinese):
http://www.pcbcopy.com/2016/ic_1128/1928.html
IIUC, It's a company in ShenZhen, which offers a service reading out
from protected STM32F103, even if it uses anti-tamper feature with a
battery.
I was aware of similar
