Re: my statements were twisted (was Security of 3DES)

2013-09-03 Thread Henry Hertz Hobbit
On 09/03/2013 04:49 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote: > To expand on what Johan Wevers said: symmetric ciphers do not change the > length > of the encrypted text (by more than the block size). They certainly do not > compress. Usually, data is compressed before encrypting it (compressing it > after > is

Re: Security of 3DES

2013-09-03 Thread Robert J. Hansen
On 9/3/2013 12:49 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote: > 3DES is safe. It's incredibly safe! How is it no match for modern CPU > power? There are no practical attacks on 3DES. What are you trying to > say? I have said this many times in the past; apparently I need to say it again. "3DES has been turning bril

Security of 3DES

2013-09-03 Thread Peter Lebbing
My main point is furtheron because I reply inline On 02/09/13 06:04, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote: > CAST5 is a good last choice because some of the time that is all others can > handle. Make sure CAST5 is always a last or next to last choice because that > may be all that they can do with a limited h