On 04/27/2014 02:48 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 27/04/14 22:40, Mirimir wrote:
>> Somebody doesn't like me :(
>
> It's just a spam issue here at the mailing list currently. Every message I
> write, I get at least one, but more commonly two mails from so-called bachelor
> ladies, usually with a p
On 04/27/2014 02:48 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 27/04/14 22:40, Mirimir wrote:
>> Somebody doesn't like me :(
>
> It's just a spam issue here at the mailing list currently. Every message I
> write, I get at least one, but more commonly two mails from so-called bachelor
> ladies, usually with a p
On 27/04/14 22:40, Mirimir wrote:
> Somebody doesn't like me :(
It's just a spam issue here at the mailing list currently. Every message I
write, I get at least one, but more commonly two mails from so-called bachelor
ladies, usually with a picture taken by a girl in the bathroom mirror. NSFW.
Pe
Somebody doesn't like me :(
Original Message
Subject: Re: Re: Trustworthy Android implementation ?
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 13:20:35 -0700
From: [REDACTED]
Reply-To: [REDACTED]
To: mirimir
hi Mirimir
I'm [REDACTED], I'm 24 and here're two photos of mysel
On 04/27/2014 09:55 AM, Old_Professor wrote:
> I'm looking for a trustworthy and user-friendly encryption product to
> use on my Android smart phone. I found four implementations of GPG. I
> don't know anything about the competence or trustworthiness of the
> implementers.
>
> I'm concerned that
I'm looking for a trustworthy and user-friendly
encryption product to use on my Android smart
phone. I found four implementations of GPG. I
don't know anything about the competence or
trustworthiness of the implementers.
I'm concerned that if the phone is lost or
stolen, how much resistance
