Am Freitag 29 Januar 2021 01:20:55 schrieb Ángel: > > I've reported concerns about the draft on https://dev.gnupg.org using > > the "wkd" tag, though that tag is also used for bug reports, feature > > requests, etc for the wkd implementation in GnuPG itself: > > > > https://dev.gnupg.org/project/profile/108/
As long as there is no other tag or subtag, `wkd` seems okay to me. The wiki or this mailinglist both seem to be okay, too. > > I don't know whether there is a preferred way to report concerns or > > suggest problems with the spec. Perhaps Werner can suggest what he > > prefers? > During this thread there were a few points that would be very > appropriate to have filled somewhere, at the very least so that they > don't get forgotten. Starting some fresh posts with summaries (or summaries on dev.gnupg.org) is helpful to me. I admit that I've lost the overview in the monster thread. It is hard to spot the arguments in the noise, this is why I suggest to split and summarize. Best Regards, Bernhard -- www.intevation.de/~bernhard +49 541 33 508 3-3 Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998 Geschäftsführer Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
