On Wednesday 13 June 2007 18:04:08 David Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 05:18:54PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> > I think that the problem came few months ago : as I changed computer
> > I exported secret key only, but not secret-subkey. And so I
> > installed the keyring but without sec
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 05:18:54PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> I think that the problem came few months ago : as I changed computer
> I exported secret key only, but not secret-subkey. And so I
> installed the keyring but without secret part of my subkey on my
> current computer.
>
> Questio
On Thursday 07 June 2007 16:00:49 David SMITH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 12:31:19PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> > Hello David,
> >
> > (note: I'm able to revoke this subkey (done but not sent to keyserver
> > yet)).
>
> Do you mean that you have already generated the revocation certifica
On Thursday 07 June 2007 17:32:08 Charly Avital wrote:
> Bruno Costacurta wrote the following on 6/7/07 1:31 PM:
> [...]
>
> > Hello David,
> >
> > (note: I'm able to revoke this subkey (done but not sent to keyserver
> > yet)).
> >
> >[...]
>
> Bruno,
>
> I have just downloaded (again) your key no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Bruno Costacurta wrote the following on 6/7/07 1:31 PM:
[...]
>
> Hello David,
>
> (note: I'm able to revoke this subkey (done but not sent to keyserver yet)).
>
>[...]
Bruno,
I have just downloaded (again) your key now, and it looks like:
pub
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 12:31:19PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> (note: I'm able to revoke this subkey (done but not sent to keyserver yet)).
Do you mean that you have already generated the revocation certificate
previously, or that you have just generated one now?
> The prob
On Thursday 07 June 2007 10:27:08 David SMITH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 06:53:48PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> > Sorry but indeed I have the secret key for 0x2E604D51 and it's valid (I
> > just installed my gpg keyrings on a new computer and use it for signing).
> > The 0CC897B5 is a su
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 06:53:48PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> Sorry but indeed I have the secret key for 0x2E604D51 and it's valid (I just
> installed my gpg keyrings on a new computer and use it for signing).
> The 0CC897B5 is a subkey and was created automatically with 0x2E604D5
> creatio
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 18:56:20 Charly Avital wrote:
> Bruno Costacurta wrote the following on 6/6/07 5:23 PM:
> > Hello,
> > I'm not able to decrpyt message as I received hereafter message about
> > using subkey instead of primary key.
>
> This is your public key, as I have just downloaded it f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Bruno Costacurta wrote the following on 6/6/07 5:23 PM:
> Hello,
> I'm not able to decrpyt message as I received hereafter message about using
> subkey instead of primary key.
This is your public key, as I have just downloaded it from the servers:
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 18:01, David SMITH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:14:18PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> > gpg --list-secret-keys -v 0x2E604D51
> > gpg: using PGP trust model
> > gpg: no secret subkey for public subkey 0CC897B5 - ignoring
> > sec 1024D/2E604D51 2006-06-11
> > ui
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:14:18PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> gpg --list-secret-keys -v 0x2E604D51
> gpg: using PGP trust model
> gpg: no secret subkey for public subkey 0CC897B5 - ignoring
> sec 1024D/2E604D51 2006-06-11
> uid Bruno Costacurta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> uid
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 16:48:45 David SMITH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 04:23:58PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'm not able to decrpyt message as I received hereafter message about
> > using subkey instead of primary key.
> >
> > Is this correct ? Could it be the problem r
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 04:23:58PM +0200, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm not able to decrpyt message as I received hereafter message about using
> subkey instead of primary key.
>
> Is this correct ? Could it be the problem relies on the usage of this subkey ?
> If yes, how to manage my
Hello,
I'm not able to decrpyt message as I received hereafter message about using
subkey instead of primary key.
Is this correct ? Could it be the problem relies on the usage of this subkey ?
If yes, how to manage my keyring regarding this
subkey (which is obviously used for en/decrypting not
15 matches
Mail list logo
