Laurent Jumet wrote:
> Hello Andrew !
>
> Andrew Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> owNCWmg2MUFZJlNZdJmIEgAAe3///nJoRmAH/Niv/3AAf///6gBYUQJIRKgCBAGA
>>> EDAAMkCwANlIioNAGmgAAyAAAaA0aAAB6hoaA0YhwaNGgaDQGTEBkaGQABppkAAA
>>> wQAGqZNBPFTbVPQnqaBoNGgZNMZQG1AAG1NAPUNo0IVjWWSuyM1TmmqY8NR90zKy
>>> 12j
Hello David !
David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> May we assume that no-force-v3-sigs is the default in 1.4.7 ?
> It is not the default. It should be made the default eventually, but
> it's not yet.
I was thinking about expiration date of subkeys: sh
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 05:02:44AM +0100, Laurent Jumet wrote:
>
> Hello David !
>
> David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> May we assume that no-force-v3-sigs is the default in 1.4.7 ?
>
> > It is not the default. It should be made the d
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 05:25:35PM +0100, Laurent Jumet wrote:
> Hello !
>
> May we assume that no-force-v3-sigs is the default in 1.4.7 ?
It is not the default. It should be made the default eventually, but
it's not yet.
David
_
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
owNCWmg2MUFZJlNZdJmIEgAAe3///nJoRmAH/Niv/3AAf///6gBYUQJIRKgCBAGA
EDAAMkCwANlIioNAGmgAAyAAAaA0aAAB6hoaA0YhwaNGgaDQGTEBkaGQABppkAAA
wQAGqZNBPFTbVPQnqaBoNGgZNMZQG1AAG1NAPUNo0IVjWWSuyM1TmmqY8NR90zKy
12jrMdhEbD0z16J17Xgxg4pkASOuseqqEE7yFL5TI0I