Re: Keyserver question...again

2009-02-03 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:36, yocha...@localnet.com said: > Sorry for being redundant, but what are some good keyservers to use? The > ones that are on a stock Kgpg setup don't seem to work too well. hkp://keys.gnupg.net or if you need to use http: http://http-keys.gnupg.net There is a si

Re: Keyserver question...again

2009-02-03 Thread Alex Amiryan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The most popular ones are: hkp://pgp.mit.edu hkp://subkeys.pgp.net My favorite one is http://keyserver.pgp.com (ldap://keyserver.pgp.com for KGpg). It also requires to confirm your email address. John B wrote: > Hiya gang, > > Sorry for being r

Re: Keyserver question...again

2009-02-03 Thread Werner Koch
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:40, a...@amiryan.org said: > The most popular ones are: > hkp://pgp.mit.edu Do not use this server becuase it runs way too old software! > hkp://subkeys.pgp.net If you can't avoid it it is okay, the servers in this pool at least don't mangle your keys. > My favorite one i

Re: Keyserver question...again

2009-02-03 Thread John Clizbe
John B wrote: > Sorry for being redundant, but what are some good keyservers to use? The > ones that are on a stock Kgpg setup don't seem to work too well. pool.sks-keyservers.net pool.sks-keyservers.net is a DNS round-robin consisting of a random selection of 20 servers from a pool of well-co

Re: Keyserver question...again

2009-02-03 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 11:48 +0100, Werner Koch wrote: > > hkp://pgp.mit.edu > > Do not use this server becuase it runs way too old software! Has ever anyone tried to convince the Athena guys at MIT, to switch their server? Unfortunately it's still very well-known... -- Christoph Anton Mitterer

Re: Keyserver question...again

2009-02-03 Thread Alex Amiryan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Werner Koch wrote: > On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:40, a...@amiryan.org said: >> The most popular ones are: >> hkp://pgp.mit.edu > > Do not use this server becuase it runs way too old software! What disadvantage have this? What kind of features it is not su

Re: Keyserver question...again

2009-02-03 Thread John Clizbe
Alex Amiryan wrote: > Werner Koch wrote: >> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:40, a...@amiryan.org said: >>> The most popular ones are: >>> hkp://pgp.mit.edu > >> Do not use this server because it runs way too old software! > > What disadvantage have this? What kind of features it is not supporting? Quotin

Re: Keyserver question...again

2009-02-03 Thread Robert J. Hansen
Alex Amiryan wrote: > hkp://pgp.mit.edu Friends don't let friends use pgp.mit.edu. It is irreparably broken for modern OpenPGP keys. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Keyserver question...again

2009-02-03 Thread David Shaw
On Feb 3, 2009, at 4:40 AM, Alex Amiryan wrote: The most popular ones are: hkp://pgp.mit.edu Don't use this one. It unfortunately still runs pks, and does not handle things like subkeys properly. My favorite one is http://keyserver.pgp.com (ldap://keyserver.pgp.com for KGpg). It also req

re: Keyserver question...again

2009-02-03 Thread vedaal
David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com wrote on Tue Feb 3 15:00:06 CET 2009 : >>http://keyserver.pgp.com (ldap://keyserver.pgp.com >>It also requires to confirm your email address. >This server does not synchronize with the rest of the keyservers. >That's a feature, not a bug, as the intent of

Re: Keyserver question...again

2009-02-03 Thread John B
On 03 February 09, John B wrote: > Hiya gang, > > Sorry for being redundant, but what are some good keyservers to use? The > ones that are on a stock Kgpg setup don't seem to work too well. Thanks to everyone who contributed! It looks like it might have been a good thing the question was b