robots.txt and archiveteam.org...

2019-07-06 Thread Listo Factor via Gnupg-users
On 7/5/19 10:13 AM, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via Gnupg-users - gnupg-users@gnupg.org wrote: As for robots.txt not all archiving sites respect it: https://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Robots.txt Thanks for posting the link. To quote from the text there: > What this situation does, in fact, i

Re: robots.txt and archiveteam.org...

2019-07-06 Thread Konstantin Boyandin via Gnupg-users
I believe this subject is way off the mailing list, but just my 5 cents. 1. GDPR, as any other bloated, convoluted, written in inhuman juridical language law, mostly benefits two kinds of people: lawyers and government-related officials. It incurs a lot of ado and expenses, gives vast grounds

Re: robots.txt and archiveteam.org...

2019-07-06 Thread Michał Górny via Gnupg-users
On Sun, 2019-07-07 at 07:22 +0700, Konstantin Boyandin via Gnupg-users wrote: > I believe this subject is way off the mailing list, but just my 5 cents. > > 1. GDPR, as any other bloated, convoluted, written in inhuman juridical > language law, mostly benefits two kinds of people: lawyers and >

Re: robots.txt and archiveteam.org...

2019-07-07 Thread Listo Factor via Gnupg-users
1. GDPR, as any other bloated, convoluted, written in inhuman juridical language law, mostly benefits two kinds of people: lawyers and government-related officials. It incurs a lot of ado and expenses, gives vast grounds for power abuse and so on and so forth. It also benefits third kind of peop