1. GDPR, as any other bloated, convoluted, written in inhuman juridical
language law, mostly benefits two kinds of people: lawyers and
government-related officials. It incurs a lot of ado and expenses, gives
vast grounds for power abuse and so on and so forth.
It also benefits third kind of peop
On Sun, 2019-07-07 at 07:22 +0700, Konstantin Boyandin via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> I believe this subject is way off the mailing list, but just my 5 cents.
>
> 1. GDPR, as any other bloated, convoluted, written in inhuman juridical
> language law, mostly benefits two kinds of people: lawyers and
>
I believe this subject is way off the mailing list, but just my 5 cents.
1. GDPR, as any other bloated, convoluted, written in inhuman juridical
language law, mostly benefits two kinds of people: lawyers and
government-related officials. It incurs a lot of ado and expenses, gives
vast grounds
On 7/5/19 10:13 AM, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via Gnupg-users -
gnupg-users@gnupg.org wrote:
As for robots.txt not all archiving sites respect it:
https://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Robots.txt
Thanks for posting the link. To quote from the text there:
> What this situation does, in fact, i