Top links to prstat

Running NCP 2.0 up-to-date. I noticed that "top" is a link to prstat, which is somewhat bad, as they both don't have the same output or feature set (for example, prstat supports zones, while top does not). I guess the best solution would be to ship GNU top in NCP instead of trying to simulate it.

Re: Top links to prstat

Jerome Warnier wrote: > Running NCP 2.0 up-to-date. > > I noticed that "top" is a link to prstat, which is somewhat bad, as they > both don't have the same output or feature set (for example, prstat > supports zones, while top does not). > > I guess the best

Re: pciutils package changes

Jason Upton wrote: > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > >>> Just uploaded. And now many of my "Unknown" PCI devices are recognized. >>> :) >>> >> I guess this is just a question of updating the pciids db (using the >> provided "update-pciids" script for example, wh

Gnusolaris diffs

Hi guys, I just had a look at patches in: http://www.nexenta.org/diffs-gnusolaris/ I was wondering how comes some of the diffs there are of size 0? Also, what is the current policy for submitting patches to "upstream" (Ubuntu, Debian or upstream)? ___ g

Re: Gnusolaris diffs

Anil Gulecha wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Jerome Warnier wrote: > >> Hi guys, I just had a look at patches in: >> http://www.nexenta.org/diffs-gnusolaris/ >> >> I was wondering how comes some of the diffs there are of size 0? >> > >

Re: Gnusolaris diffs

Anil Gulecha wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Jerome Warnier wrote: > >> Jerome Warnier wrote: >> >>> Anil Gulecha wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Jerome Warnier >>>> wrote: &

Re: Gnusolaris diffs

Jerome Warnier wrote: > Anil Gulecha wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Jerome Warnier >> wrote: >> >> >>> Hi guys, I just had a look at patches in: >>> http://www.nexenta.org/diffs-gnusolaris/ >>> >>&g

eAccelerator package for NCP2

I just tried to port the package for eAccelerator (php5-eaccelerator from Andrew McMillan[1]). It works as soon as you add the following option to configure: --with-eaccelerator-userid=www-data As this is not an official package from Ubuntu, would it have its place somewhere in Nexenta? [1] http:

Re: eAccelerator package for NCP2

officially packaged for Debian (like XCache), or are meant to be integrated in PHP6 (APC, read http://davidwalsh.name/php6). Previously, I used Zend Optimizer (which is not Free Software) and APC. > Cheers, > -Tim > > [2] http://andrew.mcmillan.net.nz/node/70 > [3] http://lists.debian.org/

Re: eAccelerator package for NCP2

Andrew McMillan wrote: > On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 11:16 +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: > >> Tim Spriggs wrote: >> >>> Hi Jerome, >>> >>> If it is already packaged then the question begging to be asked is, >>> "why is the package n

Re: eAccelerator package for NCP2

Andrew McMillan wrote: > On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 12:53 +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: > >>> >>> >> Performance is not all. >> XCache is shipped with Lenny and APC is going to be included by default >> in PHP6. >> > > APC is also i

Security maintenership

Hi, Now that NCP 2.0 is out, I wondered about security updates. What is Nexenta's current policy about security updates? Thanks ___ gnusol-devel mailing list gnusol-devel@lists.sonic.net http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel

Re: hardy-unstable opensolaris b124 update

Anil Gulecha wrote: > Thanks, Jason. > > Yes, both of these issues are known, and we're working on fixing them. > Any news about a fix for the first one (SSH server no longer accepting connections)? [..] ___ gnusol-devel mailing list gnusol-devel@list

Re: hardy-unstable opensolaris b124 update

Anil Gulecha wrote: >> I'm not 100% sure why I had to do this and didn't dig into it. I >> suspect something like a new .deb version was uploaded with the same >> revision and so "apt-get update" didn't cause my local cache to >> > > Yes.. the version number was the same. You'd need to run rm

Usefulness of /etc/user_attr.d/sunwcsr

On my NCP3 Alpha1 system upgraded from NCP2, I notice a /etc/user_attr.d directory, with only one file called "sunwcsr" which content is identical to the file /etc/user_attr. I understand the concept of ".d" directories but I guess the content is not supposed to be duplicated. But which file is rig

Root zpool mirroring and GRUB

Hi, Since the problem I experienced when upgrading from NCP2 to NCP3 with GRUB not being updated, I'm wondering on several subjects related to root zpool mirroring. IF there are several disks on the system during installation, you are prompted if you want to use them to create your pool, the defa

Re: Root zpool mirroring and GRUB

Anil Gulecha wrote: > Hi Jerome, > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Jerome Warnier wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Since the problem I experienced when upgrading from NCP2 to NCP3 with >> GRUB not being updated, I'm wondering on several subjects related to &g

Nexenta and RBAC

Hi, I know that Nexenta (like Ubuntu) is mainly using sudo to allow users to accomplish actions (as other users) they would otherwise be unable to do. (Open)Solaris, though, has its own, clean and mature, way of doing this kind of stuff, which is called RBAC, and is quite different to sudo (but mo

gpg: Warning: using insecure memory!

The following bug still in the Launchpad should probably not be forgotten, though it has not been imported to Redmine: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nexenta/+bug/184751 ___ gnusol-devel mailing list gnusol-devel@lists.sonic.net http://lists.sonic.net/mailma

Re: Usefulness of /etc/user_attr.d/sunwcsr

On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 21:40 +0100, Jerome Warnier wrote: > On my NCP3 Alpha1 system upgraded from NCP2, I notice a /etc/user_attr.d > directory, with only one file called "sunwcsr" which content is > identical to the file /etc/user_attr. > I understand the concept of "