Just to prove I can't do things half-way, I found a little bug in
back/configure, and I ended up rewriting the whole thing. So if a few
people could test that it still works as well as before, that would be
good.
Also, I fixed the art backend to 'fall back' to xlib if all the
dependancies are
Hi,
There were many talks about 1.0 release of GNUstep. Many of participants
argued, that the GNUstep is not ready for the 1.0 release. Can someone
who know the internals say, what exactly is needed for the release?
Please, create a check-list here:
http://mediawiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Roadmap
Fred Kiefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Koelman wrote:
>> The only way in which the content of the installer deviates from the
>> actual gui 0.9.4 release is a small patch on NSMenu.h. Without this
>> patch the windows port of gcc 3.2.3 dumps core.
>
>>
>
> Has this already been reported an
Tom Koelman wrote:
The only way in which the content of the installer deviates from the
actual gui 0.9.4 release is a small patch on NSMenu.h. Without this
patch the windows port of gcc 3.2.3 dumps core.
Has this already been reported and fixed in CVS? I don't remember seeing
this problem before.
Hi,
it took some time, but now there is a new Windows Installer. And this
one contains gui and back as well! As an added bonus base is now
linked with zlib and I threw in a newer version of gdb.
The release consists of the following files:
GNUstep-base-1.10.1-gui-0.9.4.exe
MD5-checksums-GNUstep-
