CVSROOT:/cvsroot/gnustep
Module name:gnustep
Branch:
Changes by: Richard Frith-Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/10/22
07:53:11
Modified files:
core/gui : ChangeLog
core/gui/Tools : make_services.m
Log message:
Attempt to get list of
Test results for GNUstep as of Sat Oct 22 06:34:22 EDT 2005
If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will
be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm
If you would like to add your machine to this list, set up a cron job
(make sure you set up your PATH and other
Le 21 oct. 05 à 22:50, Adam Fedor a écrit :
On 2005-10-18 18:36:23 -0600 Andrew Ruder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Gna.org's hosting service has been nixed more or less by most. I
don't think that this is worth pursuing because of the overall
negative response.
I've think I've forgotten
I've been with GNUstep over several years now and I agree that it is currently
encountering a state of slow stagnation.
Quoting Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it has
become a cause for concern for me.
I've been
Gregory John Casamento wrote:
GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it has
become a cause for concern for me.
Here I have to agree with you. GNUstep is for some time now actually
usable, but progress and contributions have slowed down a lot. I can
only talk
Fred,
--- Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory John Casamento wrote:
GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it
has
become a cause for concern for me.
Here I have to agree with you. GNUstep is for some time now actually
usable, but progress and
On 10/22/05, Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it hasbecome a cause for concern for me.
yes, many people seems to be quite busy irl lately :-/
I've been doing a lot of thinking and have compiled a list of things I
Nicolas,
--- Nicolas Roard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/22/05, Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it
has
become a cause for concern for me.
yes, many people seems to be quite busy irl lately :-/
Yes,
Adam,
--- Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-10-18 18:36:23 -0600 Andrew Ruder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Gna.org's hosting service has been nixed more or less by most. I
don't think that this is worth pursuing because of the overall
negative response.
I've think
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 02:50:39PM -0600, Adam Fedor wrote:
On 2005-10-18 18:36:23 -0600 Andrew Ruder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Gna.org's hosting service has been nixed more or less by most. I
don't think that this is worth pursuing because of the overall
negative response.
I've
On Oct 22, 2005, at 5:53 AM, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
Yes, and I'd like to add to this: we need to simplify the way people
report
bugs. Remember the BugNeXT application?
(http://www.levenez.com/NeXTSTEP/Demos.html) It's was a simple and
fast way how
to bug the developers at NeXT about their.
On Oct 22, 2005, at 7:56 PM, Andrew Ruder wrote:
Perhaps we can have the savannah folks disable it?
No, they will not do that. We could just as easily decide to make our
project non-free and then tell everyone to delete their free copies of
the project. I don't think that would go over
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 08:56:50PM -0500, Andrew Ruder wrote:
Is there anything in particular keeping you at savannah? The way I see
it, if savannah is unable to keep up with changing times and there is
another FSF ran service that can, there's really no reason to feel like
we must stay with
Gregory John Casamento wrote:
Adam,
--- Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-10-18 18:36:23 -0600 Andrew Ruder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Gna.org's hosting service has been nixed more or less by most. I
don't think that this is worth pursuing because of the overall
negative
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 09:20:53PM -0600, Adam Fedor wrote:
No, they will not do that. We could just as easily decide to make our
project non-free and then tell everyone to delete their free copies of
the project. I don't think that would go over well :-)
Ah, well, I think most of the
Alex,
--- Alex Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is what permanent HTTP redirects are for. Please, if we were to go
the route of moving, don't request that a nasty page with a please
click on the link below or a meta-redirect be set up when there is a
proper solution (HTTP redirect,
16 matches
Mail list logo
